Is TNT going to re-run these things anytime soon? “Crouch End” is my favorite King story (because I dislike King but adore Lovecraft), and I wanna see it.
I am often entertained by things other people find boring, so I don’t care that all the rest of you hated it.
[sub]Sixty Lost in Underground Horror[/sub]
Somehow I missed reading Battleground. (Or I’ve completely forgotten it!) What book is it from?
I really liked it. No commercials, no dialogue - just action. Oh yeah - I looked away for a second or something - why did the lady on the plane look at him funny?
Crouch End has never been one of my favorite stories. I watched the show, but thought it was stupid. The cat’s eye looked SO fake!
I’ll be watching the rest of them, though!
My favorite that I wish they would make would be The Mist.
Just finished “Crouch End”. The casting director should be taken out back and shot. The script for this placed the whole burden of carrying the atmosphere of the piece on the shoulders of the two leads, and they were both terrible. The pace was wrong, as well. Some really good, 70s throwback cinematography wasted. Shame.
I agree. I actually found myself getting angry throughout the episode- angry that it sucked so very, very much. The only saving grace was that I got to look at Claire Forlani for an hour or so… and she’s looking a little ragged around the edges nowadays.
The cat looked like crap, too. Jeez, that was the best they could do?
We watched and both thought “Battleground” was way better than “Crouch End.” No comparison even. I was worried a little bit about “Battleground” at first. About half-way through I questioned how they could keep it going for another half-hour but they did and I wasn’t disappointed. My only complaint was that the “we’re not using any dialogue” thing seemed like it was trying too hard at times. The grunting got to me a little. “Crouch End” isn’t worth discussing any more than saying I didn’t like it. Very weak.
We’ll definitely keep tuning in to see more. We’re both suckers for Stephen King movies.
Yeah, there was one moment when I almost felt a chill…when she walked through the tunnel and that thing asked her for a cigarette, but then they zoomed up on the face and it was the cat. :rolleyes:
I thought the visual look was the worst part of the piece (even worse than the acting of the husband). There’s nothing that indicates a director has no idea what to do with their material than to trick things up with fisheye lenses and shuddering camerawork and Cuisinart cutting. None of it added to tension or atmosphere or mood so it was transparently there as a gimmick to ratchet up some kind of emotion. Everything about the directorial choices (especially the long dialogue sequences) was W-R-ONG. This would’ve been a tough story to adapt in the first place, but the conception from the word Go was terribly mishandled.
I got home too late for “Battleground”, but I taped it so I’ll be watching it soon.
I’m not sure either. All I could tell is that the duckie was one of the toys Hans created and WH used its quack as the ringtone to get the guard’s attention before the hit?
Here’s a stupid question… All the trinkets in the display case where he put the figurine were mementos of past hits, yes? Were there any (other than the voodoo doll that was on another shelf) that had any noticable signifigance or were a reference to another story? It just seemed that the shot of it lingered in order for the viewer to get a good look at everything. Anyone catch anything there?