# Anybody up for a TWA 800 discussion?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anybody-up-for-a-twa-800-discussion/490944>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [March 27, 2009, 1:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anybody-up-for-a-twa-800-discussion/490944 "2009-03-27T01:32:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 517

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2009, 5:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anybody-up-for-a-twa-800-discussion/490944/517 "2009-05-31T17:59:10Z")

</div>

> [@Jetblast](#):
>
> I made a very specific point about the serious lack of merit in your entries about flash quality and type of explosion and your having to abandon them and not be able to account for, or even answer, them. Your follow-through, once again, ignored your plainly obvious failure to back your arguments. Yet, you somehow construe that as me not being able to back up my stuff (so much so that you abandoned your points).

Go back and read your replies to me.

You **asserted** a lot of things, but have failed to produce a single bit of evidence to support your assertions. Where is the testimony of an actual expert, (not a CT loon) that a fuel-air exposion in a heated tank could not appear like an ordnance explosion from a distance of over ten miles?  
You have not proided it.

I have not abandoned any points. I simply decline to continue posting evidence with actual links to actual events when you are going to dismiss them, deny the evidence of your own eyes, then post more things that you have invented or quoted from loons without even bothering to provide links so that we may see that you have not misquoted anyone or manipulated the quote.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anybody-up-for-a-twa-800-discussion/490944)._