**
Here ya go. I didn’t realize this was a point of a contention. Sorry.
A couple snippets, taken from The Washington Post - War Cry From the Pulpit
So I don’t think my own paraphrase was that far off, Al. In fact, I think I was dead on.
That’s exactly what I’m asking, Al. Why the need to interject religion at all when giving our reasons for defeating, or answering, terrorists?
Why not just say we’re pissed off and going to get 'em, like we would a murderer or serial rapist?
The Chief of police doesn’t say God is on their side in their pursuit to fight crime. Or if they do, I don’t see it used as a reason much.
Now, Sam Stone and others brought up some interesting points. I understand that at a certain level, we must show the world that it’s not just one religious stance that we taking, but more a combination of them all, working in tandem to go after terrorists.
And while I understand that part, once it’s explained to me, I still don’t understand why it was brought up in the first place.
If I’m sitting here confused, and wondering about it, in America, how in the world is another person half way around the world going to understand its real meaning?
It seems to me that with a bit of twisting, and not all that much I might add, we’ve given other religions or people who have no knowledge of us at all in other parts of the world, ammunition to use those words against us.
Couldn’t they then frame the arguments to their people as a ‘Look people. They believe their God is more just than ours. We can’t have that, they want to rid us of our religion! Go get ‘em!!’?
Or is that completely naïve on my part.
Why not just avoid any reference to the God word, or religion?
How does it help us to use it?