I’m not interested in answering any hypotheticals, even if you eventually manage to come up with one that’s analogous to the thing we’re discussing. I’m just happy you’ve finlly conceded the point, or at least you’re not continuing to make ridiculous claims about the SS trust fund.
So, what part of my statement was wrong?
1.) You’re married
2.) Your husband has a six-figure income
3.) You are on SSDI
Your statement should have been this. (Audio)
Too true. For me, curlcoat is like a really infected zit–I know I should just leave well enough alone, but I just can’t resist the temptation to poke at her and see what kind of vile pus comes spewing out.
Absolutely! You are an oasis of financial stability in the economic desert, just like SS.
Good news everyone! Curlcoat has now moved on/gotten her hooks into a new topic, so maybe this one will finally rest in peace someday (although look for the new one to become the most replied to pit thread, after this one)
Interesting how you don’t bother to actually post what your statement was.
And with this post, it’s now the most replied-to topic in the Pit.
w00t! We are over the top! This is now officially the most replied-to thread in the Pit, ever!
Hey, Piss Boy. Where’s my shirt?
Yeah, interesting. So are you going to answer his question, or are you just going make evasive comments like this one?
Since your fat fingers apparently are too pudgy to operate a mousewheel, I’ll do it for you. I went from:
to:
I think the latter broke the former down rather nicely, don’t you, you fucking retard?
Pssst, cwthree: “**her **question.”
Sorry 'bout that. My bad. It’s these darned intertubes, making it hard for me to see who I’m quoting at.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: given my generally gender-neutral usernames and the overall tendency for webbernets demographics to skew more heavily toward the male side of the population, I’m never gonna take it personally. 
It has nothing to do with whether or not I can operate a mousewheel. The statement that you failed to include, because it shows up your stupidity, was “Unless you count your sugar daddy” which you then followed up with something about my husband - if nothing else, a husband is not a sugar daddy. But of course you aren’t going to include anything that makes you look stupid or wrong, are you? Or do you simply have no experience with husbands other than those that cheat?
I’m sorry, the insult appears to have gone over your head. I was referring to him as your sugar daddy as another way of calling you a whore, whereby he keeps your lazy ass supported in exchange for sexual favors. Is that clear enough, you fucking retard? Otherwise, I can draw a diagram.
I’m not Shot From Guns, but do you realize that one way to keep a sugar daddy is to marry him? Such as you did? Found yourself a nice man with a good income so you wouldn’t slide back into that fate worse than death…poverty. Too bad not everyone can marry someone who will take care of them. So, yeah, based on your attitude, I think you may very well have married for money and stability. Which can make your man a sugar daddy. I know you’ll tell us you married for love, but I’m gonna find that hard to believe given your lack of empathy towards other humans.
Again, you are a sorry excuse for a social animal. I’m suprised you don’t understand all these taking care of the whole pack concepts better. Your dog(s) must be ashamed!
“The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves in their separate, and individual capacities.” ~~Abraham Lincoln
The Republican Party would do well to examine its own history, and discover where it jumped the tracks.
Oh do. Please do. Not that I have any dog in this fight, but I’d really like to see that diagram.
Abraham Lincoln could have used a copy editor.