# Anything New on the "Voynich" Manuscript?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anything-new-on-the-voynich-manuscript/565432>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [December 26, 2010, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anything-new-on-the-voynich-manuscript/565432 "2010-12-26T15:57:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 111

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [January 16, 2023, 2:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anything-new-on-the-voynich-manuscript/565432/111 "2023-01-16T02:13:40Z")

</div>

> [@terentii](#):
>
> can’t find it right now, but there was an article in a respectable journal a few years ago that offered a convincing explanation of the manuscript.

Probably covered in this thread.

> [@Voynich manuscript finally deciphered?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/voynich-manuscript-finally-deciphered/821113):
>
> I think Cecil hit this one once. Twould appear a lot of folks spent a lot of time looking the wrong way and the wrong place and the wrong century. See: At least at first read, it seems rather conclusive.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/anything-new-on-the-voynich-manuscript/565432)._