Let’s see if it pays off for them.
It’s a bold strategy, Cotton.
i was going to post about ms halligan’s remarks yest., but reckoned it was worth it. just a whinging about “he was mean to me”, “waaahhhaahhh”.
unlike ms halligan’s indictment, there is a transcript of what was said in court on weds.. proof of what was said by whom to whom. unlike the indictment where there is no proof of what was said and done.
Look, the proof will come soon enough! They just need to finish typing it!
Halligan must be getting tips on how to handle judges from an expert. Alina Habba I’m guessing. Whining about the judge is a sure strategy.
Attorneys whining about judges being unfair or mean is not at all unusual. (And I believe that some attorneys try to provoke the decision-maker into uttering an intemperate remark.) Sometimes a reviewing body might accept such accusations. Other times, the lawyer is performing for their client. “It wasn’t MY fault!”
“You’re being mean to me for holding me accountable for my words and actions” is kind of the MAGA brand.
You’re not suggesting someone in the prosecution team is trying to sabotage their case…?
Look, the proof will come soon enough!
They have packets.
How will this perjury case be dismissed:
- Halligan - I’m just an insurance lawyer!
- Trump - I am vindictive incarnate!
- Comey - I literally told the truth!
- All the above
I’ll go with 1 and hope for 2.