# Aphrodite offers to set you with with an adoring hottie. There is, of course, a snag.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [October 21, 2011, 1:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356 "2011-10-21T13:55:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/a88e4f/32.png) [@Otara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otara)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 1:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/61 "2011-10-22T01:52:39Z")

</div>

I can Der Trish’s point depending on what we’re talking about.

If I beat her senseless every day for a year, will she still love and adore me the same as if Id never touched her? What are we talking about here love/brainwashing wise?

If I have a puppet, theres an absolute power kind of problem here.

Otara

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 2:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/62 "2011-10-22T02:17:28Z")

</div>

Since she;s already left her husband, I’d like to meet her. What’s done is done.

Technically, the decision is perfectly identical to what I am hoping I will happen with every woman I date. Since all the women I date are in their 30s they’ve all ended a relationship at some point.

I don’t buy Der Trihs’s theory that the woman’s not a human. The OP’s description simply doesn’t say that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YogSothoth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/8edcca/32.png) [@YogSothoth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/YogSothoth)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 2:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/63 "2011-10-22T02:23:47Z")

</div>

> [@even\_sven](#):
>
> If everyone in love was in love because of Aphrodite? I might kill myself, or become a full-on hedonist for as long as I could and then kill myself. What’s the point when you know there is absolutely no free will or even a credible illusion of it?

Eh, free will’s overrated. I’d rather be happy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grumman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Grumman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grumman)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 4:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/64 "2011-10-22T04:43:04Z")

</div>

> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#):
>
> Some would say that knowingly profiting from an unethical act makes you complicit in said act.

I hate those people. If I’m physically incapable of deterring or punishing the culprits (because they are long dead or deities) and I’m physically incapable of making amends with the victims (because they are long dead or affected in a way I cannot cure), calling me complicit is stupid.

I’d get the woman’s number, and I’d tell her what happened. I wouldn’t tell her ex-partner, because they have no reason to believe me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CanvasShoes](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/74df32/32.png) [@CanvasShoes](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CanvasShoes)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 5:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/65 "2011-10-22T05:20:38Z")

</div>

> [@Jackmannii](#):
>
> I’d say: “Aphrodite, do you know there’s a chump on the Dope who thinks Athena is hotter than you?”
> 
> And before you know it, he has to change his username to **Skald the Gerbil**.

Ditto..

Wouldn’t the Goddess of Love be hotter than some huntress chick?

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 5:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/66 "2011-10-22T05:49:54Z")

</div>

I’m with DT. This sounds less like a romantic partner than a pet at this point. This isn’t a real person who loves me for me. This a pet who loves its master because it was made that way.

It sucks that he isn’t going to be satisfied in any other relationship, but I’m not going to be satisfied in any relationship where I’m the only one making the actual decision to be in it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Invisible\_Chimp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/f05b48/32.png) [@Invisible\_Chimp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Invisible_Chimp)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 6:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/67 "2011-10-22T06:07:06Z")

</div>

> [@CanvasShoes](#):
>
> Ditto..
> 
> Wouldn’t the Goddess of Love be hotter than some huntress chick?
> 
> 😃

The huntress was Artemis, not Athena.

Again, I figure we’re both victims of Aphrodite. As long as I told the hottie what happened, it’s informed consent. I try not to worry about things I can’t control.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Foggy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foggy/32/1082_2.png) [@Foggy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Foggy)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 6:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/68 "2011-10-22T06:30:11Z")

</div>

Thank you, but no I’m not interested.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Koxinga](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/4af34b/32.png) [@Koxinga](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Koxinga)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 6:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/69 "2011-10-22T06:31:15Z")

</div>

In Greek mythology, would the gods be able to exercise long term control over a mortal’s will this way? I know that they drove various people mad and tricked them into doing despicable things, e.g., Hera vs. Herakles vs. Herakes’ children. But to me that would be different from Hera simply reshuffling Herk’s mind such that “You hate your children now and want to kill them.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 6:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/70 "2011-10-22T06:43:54Z")

</div>

> [@Invisible\_Chimp](#):
>
> As long as I told the hottie what happened, it’s informed consent.

I don’t see how; consent implies the ability to say no, to make choices. She can’t. She can’t consent to a relationship any more than your car can consent to you driving it. She no longer has the mental equipment to consent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 12:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/71 "2011-10-22T12:24:20Z")

</div>

For crying out loud, folks, she just hit the beauty with one of Cupid’s Arrows with your name on it. It’s not nice, but it’s how everyone falls in love. The-o-retically.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kobal2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kobal2/32/20_2.png) [@Kobal2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kobal2)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/72 "2011-10-22T13:50:36Z")

</div>

On the one hand, I’m absolutely the kind of guy who would turn down such a deal out of some silly ethical concerns, even if it means more pain for everybody involved as is the case here. Or possibly \*because \*it means more pain for everybody involved. The easy way is not my way, not when there’s a perfectly serviceable hard way right over there.

On the other hand, Greek gods have never been quite down with people turning down their “favours”, and Aphrodite can be kind of a cunt when she’s made to leave in a huff… That might be just a tad too hard a way. I wouldn’t want Ares riding my ass just because I upset his wuvey dovey honeycat, that dude is a _psycho_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 4:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/73 "2011-10-22T16:41:16Z")

</div>

The problem I have with **Der Trihs** ’s solution is not that he doesn’t want to go through with it, but that he thinks it’s his choice to decide whether or not she gets to live or not. Quite a few people live without ever finding anyone to love as a life partner. Heck, if I remember correctly, **Der Trihs** has said that he’s never been in love.

As for myself, I agree that, if the Greek pantheon exists, then Aphrodite is ultimately responsible for everyone who falls in love, and thus there’s no ethical dilemma. There is no difference between what she did and someone just happening to fall out of love with their spouse, and then fall in love with someone else.

Now if she’s just some alien with mind control powers, that’s a totally different story. I’d still take the number, but then, when she left, I’d tear it up and never use it. It’s unfortunate that the woman has to fall out of love and will never fall back in love, but I am ethically required to do what little I can to thwart the injustice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/74 "2011-10-22T16:44:33Z")

</div>

If some god said “Thanks for rescuing my dog. I just made a rich guy pull all of the money out of his bank accounts and cash out all of his bonds. If he meets you, he’ll give you all of his money,” I also wouldn’t take it and I consider it the same thing.

Better that a person have some unfulfilled desire to do something for me than that I take advantage of it and have such power over them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Silver\_Tyger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/fbc32d/32.png) [@Silver\_Tyger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Silver_Tyger)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/75 "2011-10-22T20:47:15Z")

</div>

> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#):
>
> :mad:  
> I’m going to need you to acknowledge Athena’s awesomeness a BIT more vehemently, S’kat. I luvs you and all, but this is my god we’re talking about.

She has her moments of poor foresight, is all I’m saying. And she’s a god, she’s doesn’t need my acknowledgment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/76 "2011-10-22T21:14:38Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> The problem I have with **Der Trihs** ’s solution is not that he doesn’t want to go through with it, but that he thinks it’s his choice to decide whether or not she gets to live or not.

Actually my point is that she is arguably _already dead_. Some pretty central portions of her mind have been replaced with rigid programming. She’s not the same person she was, and she may well not be a person any more at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2011, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/77 "2011-10-22T23:51:43Z")

</div>

> [@Silver\_Tyger](#):
>
> She [Athena] has her moments of poor foresight, is all I’m saying.

:eek:

> [@](#):
>
> And she’s a god, she’s doesn’t need my acknowledgment.

Blasphemy!

You are SO lucky that you’re already on the short list.

😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2011, 12:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/78 "2011-10-23T00:37:03Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> I don’t see how; consent implies the ability to say no, to make choices. She can’t. She can’t consent to a relationship any more than your car can consent to you driving it. She no longer has the mental equipment to consent.

You seem to be basing your claim of the Victim’s loss of personhood on her or his inability to consent. Am I correct there? If so, I think your argument is flawed.

In the first place, it’s not true that the Victim cannot consent. It’s more that the Victim can _only_ consent; the Victim has is _compelled_ to consent; the Victim has lost the freedom to _not_ consent. If the Victim were _unable_ to consent, then the Victim could not agree to an overture you made regardless of her or his wish to do so.

Please understand that I’m not saying that the Victim has not lost her or his free will; clearly Aphrodite has restricted that in at least one area. I just don’t think that saying the Victim cannot consent is the correct phrasing.

In the second place, The Victim’s inability to decline consent isn’t necessarily unlimited Aphrodite has made the Victim fall in love with you, so presumably she or he would want to have sex with you, live with you, and so forth. But that doesn’t mean the Victim would agree to anything you suggested. The Victim was in love with his or her former spouse (Aphrodite specifically said so, and surely she knows if anyone does), but that doesn’t mean the Victim was willing to have anal sex or engage in a three-way just because the spouse desired it; many persons who are in love are not.

In the third place, I’m not convinced a loss of partial loss of free will necessarily means a loss of personhood. I know a beautiful, intelligent woman who is absolutely addicted to cigarettes; she’s been trying to quit for years without success. She is, in other words, without free will when it comes to nicotine. Her addiction was gradual and naturalistic, unlike what happened to the Victim, but I don’t see that it’s qualitatively different. The Victim’s brain has been changed, but that does not make her a zombie. Also, while my friend has little or no free will when it comes to cigarettes, she has quite a bit when it comes to whom she will date, where she will work, what religion she will practice, and so forth. Why can something similar not be true of the Victim?

In the fourth place, it’s not necessarily true that the Victim’s state is permanent. Athena (or perhaps some lesser deity like Zeus 😉 ) could always kick Aphrodite’s ass and force her to undo her frivolous mischief. If you grant the existence of gods, why isn’t petitioning for _that_ a better choice than killing murder?

Lastly, one of the RhymerPrinciples is that, to avoid atrocities, one should also assume that things that walk like ducks and quack like ducks are, in fact, ducks. If the Victim still looks and acts human, I’m going to need a lot of convincing to believe that her or his inability to romantically love anyone but a single person represents a lack of personhood.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2011, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/79 "2011-10-23T01:08:02Z")

</div>

> [@AHarris](#):
>
> Isn’t this basically how the Trojan War started?
> 
> I have to agree with applecider about dealing with greek gods.

Honey? Honey, uh, do you know anything about that fleet of a thousand ships pulling up to the docks? Holy shit, is that you’re ex? Oooh, I don’t like the looks of that big guy with the fancy shield.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2011, 1:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356/80 "2011-10-23T01:50:19Z")

</div>

> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#):
>
> In the first place, it’s not true that the Victim cannot consent. It’s more that the Victim can _only_ consent; the Victim has is _compelled_ to consent; the Victim has lost the freedom to _not_ consent. If the Victim were _unable_ to consent, then the Victim could not agree to an overture you made regardless of her or his wish to do so.

The ability to consent is the ability to say yes OR no. If you can only say one or the other, it isn’t consent.

If Aphrodite were standing there with a gun pointed at the hottie’s head and said, “Hottie, agree to have sex with Skald or I’ll kill you,” and hottie agrees and you have sex with her, are you going to say that was consent because she has lost the freedom to not consent? Because I think most of us would say that’s not consent and, oh by the way, you’re a rapist.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/aphrodite-offers-to-set-you-with-with-an-adoring-hottie-there-is-of-course-a-snag/600356.md?page=5)
