Apollo 17: What if the Lunar Roving Vehicle had broken down?

I love this Apollo 15 image. The LEM just looks so lonely.

Reading the article OP posted I was struck by this:

Are there sedimentary rocks or much erosion on the Moon? Why would rocks at the bottom of a cliff be any older than those at the top?

I am not a selenologist, but I think that in many areas there is gradual buildup of dust (regolith) from splashback at the moment a crater is made – which happened more frequently several billion years ago. So, rocks further down tend to be older – and that means that these same rocks can be exposed and ejected when a crater hits, and they land, say, at the top of the new crater rim.

True, but by this stage NASA had plenty of data on moonwalking, and could make good estimates of the time and effort required to cover a distance. The suits had plenty of oxygen, I believe the longest EVA was about 7 1/2 hours. I think the real danger would have been if there had been some kind of double failure. For example if the rover had broken down, and the astronaut experienced some sort of cooling problem with their suit. How far could the they walk without experiencing heat stroke? Counter-intuitively, when working in a vacuum, the problem is preventing the astronaut from overheating, not keeping them warm. It’s likely that NASA considered issues like this, the mission planning was nothing if not meticulous.

Oh, and btw, the astronauts had to make a minor repair to the rover at the start of the second EVA. They used duct tape.

And here’s a picture of the repair.

Because they were extruded at different times. Or because they settled at different rates. Or because they were overlaid by multiple episodes of impact ejecta.