Remember, Elon Musk is the guy who makes random promises to deliver mostly vaporware and animations, and who bought Twitter because of an ill-considered joke-offer (at $54.20 a share; such a comic!). I don’t think Elon even knows what he’s actually saying half the time, and he certainly didn’t do any kind of even cursory fiscal analysis to come to a US$2T budget reduction. I would put more faith in Joe Isuzu than I would in Musk, with good reason:
The “commitment to the rule of law” had me rolling, and the “personal philosophy” of several members of the court boils down to what they can get for themselves and avoiding any accountability, but aside from that, the Supreme Court actually has no means to enforce their rulings—that is the Department of Justice function—and is under no obligation to hear arguments that they don’t want to rule upon. After two impeachments and failed removals, four years of essential non-action about inciting the January 6 insurrection, 34 felony counts that were essentially a slap on the wrist, and still no conviction on the crime of blatantly trying to interfere with electoral vote counting in Georgia where he was literally caught on tape trying to pressure the Georgia Secretary of State to “find” him the specific number of votes needed to win the state, Trump has suffered basically no real repercussions or was in any way preventing from campaigning himself to a legitimate victory in this election. How far does one have to have their head up their ass to conclude that “the courts” and legal jingle-jangle is going to put the brakes on the Trump Train, either by conviction for his numerous crimes or for any action which his team can make some legal articulations to justify the Constitutional basis of his authority or otherwise just convince at least five members of the Supreme Court to refuse to address a complaint?
Stranger