# Are all transgendered people mentally ill?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [November 1, 2017, 12:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378 "2017-11-01T12:20:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 41

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biffster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/biffster/32/339_2.png) [@Biffster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biffster)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 7:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/802 "2017-12-13T07:18:53Z")

</div>

I wonder how transgender people feel about being labelled noncisgendered.  
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AHunter3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ahunter3/32/368_2.png) [@AHunter3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AHunter3)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 7:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/803 "2017-12-13T07:51:31Z")

</div>

> [@Biffster](#):
>
> I wonder how transgender people feel about being labelled noncisgendered.

I’ve used it. I don’t specifically identify as transgender (long story) but I’m also among those who are not cisgender. I doubt many transgender people would object to “non-cisgender” if randomly applied by someone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/budget_player_cadet/32/205_2.png) [@Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Budget_Player_Cadet)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 9:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/804 "2017-12-13T09:51:50Z")

</div>

> [@Zeke\_N.Destroi](#):
>
> really, you want to talk about doctors blessings as empirical? Fine, look at where the anti-vax movement got it’s origins, check out how the opiod crisis got it’s start. Fucking check out Doctor Oz. Tell me that because some doctors okayed it that it means it is fine.
> 
> How about the doctors that thought thalidomide was cool? Or how about the multitudes that thought that guys that wanted to fuck other guys was crazy.
> 
> You can’t rely on “doctors” to support your argument when many doctors have made - and are continuing to make - mistakes based on information that is other than empirical.

So do you ever go to the doctor? For anything? If you had cancer (no idea how you would establish that without the help of a doctor, but let’s just assume), would you go to the doctor for treatment? After all, check out Doctor Oz! This is an argument against the science behind gender theory only to the degree that it is a fully general argument against doctors and medical science as a whole. It’s painfully fallacious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 12:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/805 "2017-12-13T12:39:59Z")

</div>

> [@Guinastasia](#):
>
> For one thing, just whacking off an arm is going to severely impact a person’s life. You’re getting rid of a major body part, and your ability to function is going to be diminished.
> 
> But who is being harmed by transitioning to the opposite sex? Nobody. Even a sex change operation – basically you’re just swapping one set of parts for another.

Do you have a cite that those who have undergone SRS function sexually as well as cisgender people, on average?

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 12:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/806 "2017-12-13T12:55:51Z")

</div>

> [@Zeke\_N.Destroi](#):
>
> Fair question. I guess I see it as a sort of a continuum. There are degrees. Would I say that a chronically depressed person is mentally ill? Yes. Would I say that the one who is utterly bedridden and unable to face even the most basic of daily tasks is more severely mentally ill than the one who is able to “fake it” even though each moment is difficult.
> 
> And I am not suggesting that any who identify as such should “fake it” but rather that those who feel the need to undergo entire body and life transformations are severely afflicted.

The problem I see with this comparison is that you seem to have two opposite reactions. For depression, the more severely mentally ill person is the one who is unable to face the world or live their lives. But for trans people, transitioning, or altering the way they live their lives so as to better identify as their actual gender, leads to them being better able to live their lives and face the world.

You make a similar point before - you say that “most of them are severely mentally ill and indulging that illness does them as much good as telling a paranoid schizophrenic that aliens have actually put implants into them that the CIA monitors on the constant.” The same problem; backing up a paranoid schizophrenic’s delusions will further their problems telling delusions from reality, and so lead to a reduced ability to live their lives. After all, they can’t face the world if they can’t see it. But “indulging” a trans person\* improves\* their ability to live their lives.

Fundamentally - being transgender just doesn’t work the same way as being mentally ill. It works the same way as being sane.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/budget_player_cadet/32/205_2.png) [@Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Budget_Player_Cadet)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/807 "2017-12-13T13:00:34Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Do you have a cite that those who have undergone SRS function sexually as well as cisgender people, on average?
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

That’s not a remotely fair comparison.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 1:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/808 "2017-12-13T13:02:05Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Do you have a cite that those who have undergone SRS function sexually as well as cisgender people, on average?

Given what seems to be, in my impression, plenty of trans people who had no interest, sexual or otherwise in using the genitalia they were born with, a comparison to someone who is perfectly happy with their genitals (well, at least in terms of which they have) seems like an overshoot in terms of talking about harm, as **Guinastasia** is doing.

I’m curious, though; if medical technology WAS up the standard of perfected sex changes, would this alter your position at all?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 2:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/809 "2017-12-13T14:27:06Z")

</div>

> [@Budget\_Player\_Cadet](#):
>
> That’s not a remotely fair comparison.

Then **Guinastasia** shouldn’t have made it.

But it highlights the difficulty of trying to say “transwomen are women. Period.” (Or, presumably, “transmen are men. Period.”) Simply announcing that there are no differences doesn’t make the differences go away.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/810 "2017-12-13T14:30:55Z")

</div>

> [@Revenant\_Threshold](#):
>
> Given what seems to be, in my impression, plenty of trans people who had no interest, sexual or otherwise in using the genitalia they were born with, a comparison to someone who is perfectly happy with their genitals (well, at least in terms of which they have) seems like an overshoot in terms of talking about harm, as **Guinastasia** is doing.

She referred specifically to “function”, which is why I asked for the cite.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Una\_Persson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/una_persson/32/346_2.png) [@Una\_Persson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Una_Persson)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/811 "2017-12-13T16:07:57Z")

</div>

> [@Zeke\_N.Destroi](#):
>
> really, you want to talk about doctors blessings as empirical? Fine, look at where the anti-vax movement got it’s origins, check out how the opiod crisis got it’s start. Fucking check out Doctor Oz. Tell me that because some doctors okayed it that it means it is fine.

If you actually cared about this subject enough to do any legwork, rather than playing the game of “you, person on message board, provide umpteen cites to defend what is an established medical practice,” you’d know better.

> [@](#):
>
> Here’s a challenge for you. Show me brainscans of a person born XY that correspond to to those of someone born XX or XX to XY.

This has already been done. I’ve provided the cite in past threads that there are clear similarities and anomalies many times. Others have as well. Do your own legwork.

> [@](#):
>
> Provide any empirical evidence for transgenderism that is demonstrable outside of anecdote.

What does this sentence even mean? Provide a cite for “transgenderism?”

> [@](#):
>
> Have I, even once, given a hint that I am anti-trans? No? So where’s your fucking problem?

Perhaps you should start reading your own posts.

> [@](#):
>
> Sure I do. Just as I do the claims that tobacco companies made that smoking is basically harmless. The bias is in the organizations name (check out what the “t” in WPATH stands for. Clearly there is no agenda.

So…because the American Heart Association mentions “heart” in their name, we can’t trust them on cardiac medicine? Like OMG, are you actually for real? Is no one else seeing this?

> [@](#):
>
> Yes, I did both. But fine [here is a cite for you.[url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3683633/It-worth-risk-Parents-six-year-old-transgender-boy-defend-decision-speak-publicly-son-s-transition-one-year-sharing-story.html](http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3683633/It-worth-risk-Parents-six-year-old-transgender-boy-defend-decision-speak-publicly-son-s-transition-one-year-sharing-story.html) There you go. The kid said she was a he when she was two years old and the parents went with it.

The issue was about blockers, something YOU brought up. Neither of your panic-Googled “cites” involve 6-year-olds on blockers.

You really should read your own “cites” before posting them. It makes you look…even worse. Also, posting the same link twice doesn’t equal 2 cites. You’re really failing to make any point.

> [@](#):
>
> Be you man, woman or whatever, had you characterized my statements in that way to my face I’d fucking drop you.

And here’s where you demonstrate to everyone here that you’re part of the problem. While playing wounded innocence about not hating people like me, you made a deliberate threat of violence or death towards a transgender woman who called you on some factually incorrect statements in an online forum.

You threatened to either hurt or kill me over this issue. It’s one thing if you’re just one of the socks or a newbie; I can ignore those. But an established poster who knows the rules and yet is so seething with rage that they couldn’t even control themselves in Great Debates. No, you don’t have aaaaaaaaaaany problems with transgender persons.

At this point, I’m done. I see people doing the game of “provide a cite water is wet”, others playing the “my arbitrary morals are my cite,” and like many trans threads online go, when all else fails have one of the players make a violence or death threat to create a chilling effect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AHunter3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ahunter3/32/368_2.png) [@AHunter3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AHunter3)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/812 "2017-12-13T16:35:25Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Do you have a cite that those who have undergone SRS function sexually as well as cisgender people, on average?

I don’t think this is an entirely unreasonable question. Let’s look at it, including the embedded assumptions.

First off, let’s consider the transgender person who has _not_ undergone SRS and how well they function sexually, since it isn’t really fair to compare how they function after SRS to the typical cisgender person if they weren’t functioning that well to begin with. That’s like the old joke about the patient scheduled for an operation on the hand and wrist asking the orthopedist, “So after the operation, will I be able to play the piano?” The orthopedist assures the patient, yes. “Wow, that’s so cool. I’ve never been able to play the piano and I’ve always wanted to”. The comparisons being made have to be specific to the people pursuing the surgery.

Some transgender people are able to function sexually prior to (or in the absence of) SRS more or less as well as cisgender people —and these would often tend to be people who don’t seek SRS. (Raise your hands if you were not aware that some transgender people do not find SRS a necessity for themselves).

But most of the people who seek it out are doing so because they can’t function sexually with the physical morphology with which they were born.

I visualize the probability that some of the participants in this discussion would want to call “foul” if that lack of functionality isn’t strictly a physical incapacity but rather involves processes of the mind, emotional and cognitive elements of sexual functioning. In other words, I anticipate that some people would say “That doesn’t count, if the organs in question can function physically then they’re fully functional”.

But neither you nor anyone else has a magic wand that can make it so that they are sexually functional in the environment that matters to them and to their potential and actual partners. The folks providing the surgical intervention have success stories, people who have reported back that, yes, this solution has worked for them.

That, to me, makes it sound like a reasonable and rational course of action for them to pursue. They can’t function as is. SRS has a high likelihood of making it so that they can. Neither you nor anyone else standing around second-guessing SRS as a bad idea has a better one to offer. If you think you do, by all means make it available and let folks avail themselves of it.

But it’s not an illogical or inappropriate decision, or conclusion, or course of action, or plan. It addresses the situation. It has a proven track record of outcomes satisfying to those who have gone that route.

Hence (to re-answer the titular question again) no, there’s nothing “mentally ill” about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/813 "2017-12-13T21:16:38Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> She referred specifically to “function”, which is why I asked for the cite.

If you aren’t using it, it isn’t functional, is it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/814 "2017-12-13T23:16:38Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> She referred specifically to “function”, which is why I asked for the cite.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

I was NOT talking specifically about sexual function, but about living as a trans person in general.

My comment on “function” was in regards to people who hack off limbs, NOT trans people. Is SRS necessarily always perfect? Alas, no. For example, we don’t have a way to transplant uteruses (spelling?), or, AFAIK, testicles. Medical science isn’t perfect. But by and large, it’s not the same as making yourself disabled.

I’m not an expert on the sexuality of trans people. I imagine in varies from person to person. I THINK that it’s less common for FTMs to undergo “bottom” surgery. [Here’s](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20092545) probably the best (at least most scholarly) cite I could find. The conclusion? Yes, they pretty well do function just as well. Or at least, people are satisfied with the results.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2017, 2:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/815 "2017-12-14T14:04:34Z")

</div>

> [@Una\_Persson](#):
>
> You found one article which states there could be risks to blockers, and then authoritatively state that “the results are irreversible.” You do understand that WPATH and many other major medical guidelines back the use of the blockers, right? And that the blockers, even some formulations did have some risks, also provide significant psychological relief? The many physicians I work with have read the research on the risks, and read the research on the benefits. Frontline is not a medical journal, nor is it peer-reviewed consensus of the medical community.

So is PBS fake news?

Here is the only passage with the word irreversible:

"Doctors say the benefit of using puberty blockers is that they block hormone-induced biological changes, such as vocal chord changes, the development of breast tissue or changes in facial structure, that are irreversible and can be especially distressing to children who are gender-non conforming or transgender. "

Seems like they are just saying that puberty blockers hit the pause button on puberty. But the article also mentions all sorts of risks that might come along with their use. I can’t imagine that ethical doctors use this stuff capriciously.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2017, 3:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/816 "2017-12-15T03:13:04Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> I can’t imagine that ethical doctors use this stuff capriciously.

Why imply that any doctor uses blockers capriciously? Why imply that any doctor who has used blockers has been unethical or has acted capriciously?

I am sure that there are cranks and quacks out there. However, unless one has evidence that every doctor (or some significantly large portion of such doctors) who have used blockers have been capricious, the implication that you suggest is little more than your personal beliefs imposed on situations for which you are not trained and in which you are not involved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2017, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/817 "2017-12-15T04:04:17Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> So is PBS fake news?
> 
> Here is the only passage with the word irreversible:

That’s not the usage of “irreversible” that **Una** was referring to. She was talking about this one:

> [@Zeke\_N.Destroi](#):
>
> [url=[When Transgender Kids Transition, Medical Risks are Both Known and Unknown | FRONTLINE](https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/when-transgender-kids-transition-medical-risks-are-both-known-and-unknown/)] I grant that saying 6 was maybe hyperbole/url] but yes, once puberty blockers are used the results are **irreversible**.

Bolding mine.

As you may have noted by now, this claim is not supported by his cite. Which was **Una** ’s point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2017, 4:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/818 "2017-12-15T04:17:21Z")

</div>

I can understand why a parent might be concerned about puberty blockers, (and well they should – any parent should be concerned when a drug is prescribed for their kid, no matter if it’s puberty blockers, Ritalin, or whatever). But I imagine it’s not done like, right away, or without major consideration. And eleven is right around the age when most kids start puberty, anyways.

Also, puberty blockers have other uses – precocious puberty, for example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [December 18, 2017, 8:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/819 "2017-12-18T20:09:15Z")

</div>

> [@tomndebb](#):
>
> Why imply that any doctor uses blockers capriciously? Why imply that any doctor who has used blockers has been unethical or has acted capriciously?

I’m pretty sure I was doing the opposite. So wtf are you talking about? Or did my comment about PBS being fake news color the rest of my post. Una was saying that PBS was unreliable. That statement requires a cite imo. Why is the “World Professional Association for Transgender Health” any more authoritative than a journalist?

Here is an article about how the APA dumped WPATH guidelines because they: “WPATH guidelines for psychiatric/medical/surgical “treatment” of “gender” have never been based on any research or study into the treatments they advocate. Instead, the guidelines were created by those interested in making a living off the burgeoning gender treatment market. As the practice of genderiam explodes in popularity (some clinics showing a doubling of business ANNUALLY) tension between the APA and WPATH has grown.”

and "WPATH standards of care guide offered no pretense of objectivity or professionalism and reads as more of a genderist political manifesto. "

> [@](#):
>
> I am sure that there are cranks and quacks out there. However, unless one has evidence that every doctor (or some significantly large portion of such doctors) who have used blockers have been capricious, the implication that you suggest is little more than your personal beliefs imposed on situations for which you are not trained and in which you are not involved.

Once again, WTF are you talking about. I said, I can’t imagine any doctors using this stuff capriciously. But in light of your comments and the article about WPATH, I will take that back and say that there may be a few quacks out there that might be a prescription mill for the stuff but I think it is probably vanishingly rare.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [December 18, 2017, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/820 "2017-12-18T20:11:30Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> That’s not the usage of “irreversible” that **Una** was referring to. She was talking about this one:
> 
> Bolding mine.
> 
> As you may have noted by now, this claim is not supported by his cite. Which was **Una** ’s point.

I agree his cite works against him on the notion of irreversibility.

It seems like puberty blockers can be taken (for t leas a short period of time) with minimal long term effects. It is not clear what happens when you come off of puberty blockers at 18 or 25.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broomstick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/broomstick/32/246_2.png) [@Broomstick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broomstick)\
**Post date:** [December 18, 2017, 9:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378/821 "2017-12-18T21:03:28Z")

</div>

When you come off puberty blockers you… go through puberty.

Seriously, these drugs are not new and they have other uses besides trans gender treatment, such as the previously mentioned precocious puberty as well as certain hormone-stimulated cancers and reproductive dysfunctions. They’ve been used for decades. Doctors actually do have a pretty good idea of their effects and side effects.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378.md?page=40)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-all-transgendered-people-mentally-ill/800378.md?page=42)
