Are books sacred to you? What makes throwing them away such a sin?

I’m seriously thinking about sorting our books into 3 stacks after this next move.

  1. Love it - you can borrow it, but I’ll hunt you down if it doesn’t come back.
  2. Liked it - you can borrow it, bring it back if you want.
  3. Blah - you can borrow it, but you’re not allowed to bring it back. Take it now if you are interested, because it will probably be gone the next time you look.

Books, especially current paperback books, have no special value. They are a collection of words, some of which I happen to enjoy very much. Now will someone tell my inner packrat that it’s ok to get rid of the old PiersAnthony/Xanth books I saved my babysitting money to buy?

Chocolate-Tasting Packrat, it’s ok to get rid of the old PiersAnthony/Xanth books you saved your babysitting money to buy. Whenever I have trouble parting with a book, I ask myself, would it be fairly easy for me to get my hands on a copy if I ever wanted to read it again? If the answer is yes, then I don’t need to archive it. And maybe you could even give them away to a school used-book sale or some such and provide material for other budding PiersAnthony/Xanth fans.

Edit: right after posting, I realized that I assumed that babysitting meant that you were school-age at the time. I didn’t mean to imply that PiersAnthony/Xanth are books of interest only to kids.

This thread is timely for me and my husband. We are in the process of downsizing from a huge house to a small apartment. I majored in English as an undergrad and psychology for graduate work so yeah, I have a lot of books. My husband does as well, and the grim reality is we will not have enough room to store even half our books in the new place.

I love your three categories and will now shamelessly steal them for our book reduction project.

Nope, this was a “legitimate” book, came from a book club and everything.

I own about 1200 books and have read about 1000. I’ve chosen them well, and almost every single one of them has meant something to me. Some more than others, but they’ve all had an impact. I just don’t throw away things like that. On top of that, they’ll be there for my daughter if/when she wants them. (And my will states she can’t just chuck 'em after I shuffle off. :wink:

Apart from that, I understand how much work went into their creation. Most of the ordinary household items I have were created by a drone in a factory. The drone couldn’t have cared less about the item. Not so the book. I have a hard time chucking something if I know somebody spent three long years (or more) forcing it into existence.

I buy a book, I read the book, I take the book to the library and stuff it in the return slot. I buy ten books, I read ten books, I take ten books to the library and stuff them all in the return slot.

Sometimes I give books to other people who might be interested. I learned long ago that when you loan most people books, they will never be returned. Some few references I used to keep for a while before disposing of in the library slot, but since the internet has all of that material, I stopped accumulating it. Anybody with an internet connection who buys a reference book today is a fool.

I like books, I just don’t like STORING them or MOVING them.

I may go so far as to invest in a Kindle or similar reader some day, and then I might accumulate virtual books. They don’t need shelves, they take up a lot less space and are much easier to move.

Physical books, magazines, newspapers and records are obsolete.

Once upon a time my mom and dad bought a bunch of books and records at an estate sale. They thought they had bought hundreds. They ended up with tens of thousands. All manner of old magazines, 78 RPM records, books, catalogs for early 20th century electronics suppliers… 30 years later, my dad still has every one of them. When he moved, he piled the boxes up on a trailer and made trip after trip to KEEP those boxes.

Now, I don’t personally doubt that there are treasures in that huge, impassible mound of boxes of books slowly decaying in his 3,000 square foot, 25 foot high steel barn. As I have pointed out to him, it would cost $75,000 to build a second steel building the size of the one he has stuffed with this junk. I doubt the books and records total $75,000 in value. Who knows how many times people ‘cherry picked’ that collection before mom & dad got it. At least one time since.

Overall, I don’t think it would be worth it to take YEARS out of my life to try to properly sift the treasures from the trash. When my dad dies, my brothers and I have discussed it, and we will get a VERY big dumpster, and have an auction. Whatever it is, you must take the WHOLE box. After you have bought it, you can try to trade things among yourselves. When you’re done, throw whatever is left in the dumpster or carry it out with you. Maybe you have a trendy bar and you want LPs, 45s and 78 RPM records to wallpaper and glue to the walls. Maybe you want to pave your driveway with leather bound ‘classics’ and 100 old encyclopedias with 24 out of 27 volumes. I frankly don’t care. It is basically too big a heap of things in too poor condition to be a ‘collector’ problem. It is a SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT problem.

This is just one of those anti-lessons you learn from your parents. How NOT TO do something. The very thought of hoarding and warehousing junk of this sort is appalling to me.

So, all in all, I wouldn’t burn or otherwise destroy a decent book, but I won’t preserve it any more than I would preserve old newspapers. I am not a frickin’ archive or library. If nobody else wants it, I certainly don’t want it, either. I promptly rid myself of reading material that I have already read.

Cherishing a book is one thing, but being crushed to death under an unstable mound of books you’ve collected is quite another. You have to draw the line somewhere.

Exactly. By holding each piece equally sacred, true treasures become garbage. This is why even libraries throw books away- limited resources to sort and maintain the collection.

and I think this

is somewhat misguided. The book itself didn’t take three years to make, the content within it did. Even the most ornately bound fine art book (see the Kelmscott Chaucer) takes a month or less in the hands of artisans. In general, the paperback in your hand isn’t the only repository of the content, and it isn’t a moral failing to throw it away. Whether it’s wasteful to put it in a landfill is another question, of course.

Okay, here’s the deal. Before I start throwing anything out, I’ll make a list of what’s going and post it here. If any of you want them (preferably if you live in the NYC area so you can pick them up), it’s yours. Anything that’s outdated or is still being printed I am not going to waste my time trying to get rid of - the world isn’t going to end if one copy of a widely printed book never gets read again, and most of you haven’t been able to convince me otherwise.

Count me as someone who is somewhat befuddled by such aversion to throwing out books. In real life I’ve never come across this attitude, but on the net it’s anywhere from “you should try to recycle them” to “OMG would you throw out your children too???” I kind of imagine people with the latter attitude living with thirty cats, glaring at me from behind their fort made entirely of books.

I can get not wanting to throw out your precious childhood copy of The Velveteen Rabbit or an obscure book that’s no longer in print, but if I’m doing a big clean the 503rd printing of the Lord of the Rings gets chucked into the recycling bin without a second thought. If I have time I’ll check if my friends want it or box it up for charity, the same as I would for an unused dinner set or clothes that I’ve outgrown. I honestly just don’t see the average book as having any special property that raises it above a plate or cardigan.

This needs to be repeated as it’s the best reason why books should be recycled.

Oh, and for the record, the library I work for does not throw away any books. Whatever we can’t sell we have deals with various charities that then take the books to use.

My friend is going to feel like such an idiot when she realizes she could have gotten $100 for those encyclopedias…

i’m glad to get new members into the operation paperback fold. the sdmb is where i first heard of it; and thankfully so! i’ve been able to send big amounts and small amounts. it is great to find a home for the books and know they were appreciated and passed around.

as far as romances goes… there are special requests sometimes. i’ve seen requests for the blaze series from silhouette, as well as harlequins, even (gasp) danielle steel!

when you have your books sorted and ready, you send an address request email, listing your genres or writers. they match you with people who fit your list. there are “warrior women” who want romance (sometimes you put the stickers over the bodice ripping cover) or cozy/kitchen mysteries, etc. or “warrior men” who want star trek books or car mag.s. i just sent off a bunch of history and bios.

there have even been requests for kids books from the navy, so that parents could read books to their kidlets over webcasts.

it is fun and a wonderful way to support the troops.

i hear tell that there is a set of eb from the early 1900’s that is a major collector’s item. i’m thinking the 1911ish version.

i hope that wasn’t the one that was toast.

Actually it was 2003. That seemed really recent to me, but she said she had them on Craiglist for free for a long time but no one ever wanted them. Yeah, it wasn’t my decision to burn them. It felt really weird because I’m like the rest of you guys-- I keep my books forever.

I’m about half way through my collection. I’m taking everything off the shelf, staring at each cover for 5 minutes, and then placing it into one of three piles. Pile 1 is for books I want out of my house, books I KNOW I’m never going to look at again. Each one of these is getting added to a list on my computer, which I will post here and send to my nearby friends and family (see? I’m at least TRYING here!) Pile 2 is for books that I MIGHT read sometime down the road, but it’s doubtful, but just incase I want to check if there’s an ebook of it available before I decide to get rid of it, and Pile 3 is for books that are returning to my shelf, as I either KNOW I want to read it again or it’s something that even I am having a hard time giving up access to.

The nice motivation from this project is that there are a number of books that have just been sitting around, unnoticed, for the last couple of years that I am now anxious to read. I’m starting up a 4th pile of books which haven’t been read yet, which I want to grab and go when I’m in a reading mood.

It’s not misguided at all. I fully realize that my copy isn’t the only copy. I know it isn’t a “moral failing” to throw it away. (Jesus!) I know there are gobs of other copies, electronic copies, etc. Nonetheless, some person ripped their guts out to provide the content, I enjoyed the content, or was moved by it, and there’s no way I’m chucking my copy away.

The thing to do there would have been to rent a storefront and open up a bookstore, sell all the stuff, never buy more, and profit. When I was in Boston I went to the house of a guy who, to support his book habit, opened his house by appointment to let people buy stuff. I assume he kept the books he really, really, wanted separate.

I’d guess that your parents got all that stuff really cheap, if they thought they were buying hundreds.

Sorry- I think I was being a bit of a pill yesterday- I know you didn’t suggest that it’s a moral issue- and thanks for the further elaboration of your thoughts. I don’t think that anyone has suggested that you should throw away books that you want anyway.

It hurts me to throw away any book, good or bad. I backpacked all over Europe alone and with plenty of train travel I went threw a book every 4 days. By the end my back pack was mostly books.

Take your unwanted books and redistribute them via BookCrossing (www.bookcrossing.com). Especially mass market paperbacks – those are the most widely read books.