# Are liberals dumber than conservatives?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [March 16, 2001, 5:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188 "2001-03-16T05:11:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2001, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/21 "2001-03-16T21:01:47Z")

</div>

Nothing to debate about my point, **Bill** , unless you have conflicting data. Like I said, it’s empirical. I can go try and dig up the relevant copy of PS (I think it was PS) if you’d like to know the methodology etcetera.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SPOOFE](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c5a1d2/32.png) [@SPOOFE](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SPOOFE)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2001, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/22 "2001-03-16T22:31:17Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> There is empirical evidence to indicate that the higher one’s level of education, the more likely one is to be socially liberal. Conversely, the higher one’s income, the more likely one is to be economically conservative.

Which is just more evidence that I’m a statistical fluke… I’m dumb as a stone (or so my High School grades would indicate), but I’m as socially liberal as all get out. And I’m dirt-poor, yet I’m quite the conservative when it comes to economics.

I’m not a Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Reformer, etc… I’m a HYBRID of conservative and liberal views! That’s what I’ll refer to myself from now on… as a hybrid… that sounds so effing cool…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bill\_H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a5b964/32.png) [@Bill\_H](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bill_H)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2001, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/23 "2001-03-16T23:11:36Z")

</div>

**Gadarene** wrote

> [@](#):
>
> Nothing to debate about my point, **Bill** , unless you have conflicting data.

Alright, I’ll bite. Bear in mind, I’m not arguing in favor of the OP, which I intended as a poke at similar recent threads. Rather your point, which seems to indicate the opposite (that conservatives are dumber than liberals).

> [@](#):
>
> There is empirical evidence to indicate that the higher one’s level of education, the more likely one is to be socially liberal. Conversely, the higher one’s income, the more likely one is to be economically conservative.

a) How do you account in the third empirical fact that the higher one’s level of education, the higher one’s income?

b) You specifically called out **social** liberal-ness and **economic** conservative-ness. You used the word “Conversely”, which specifically implies that the two sentences were opposites. Yet, social conservativism/liberalism and economic conservativism/liberalism are two different beasts. How do you account for this?

c) Cites please.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2001, 11:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/24 "2001-03-16T23:56:29Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Bill H. \*  
> **Gadarene** wrote
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > Nothing to debate about my point, **Bill** , unless you have conflicting data.
> 
> Alright, I’ll bite. Bear in mind, I’m not arguing in favor of the OP, which I intended as a poke at similar recent threads. Rather your point, which seems to indicate the opposite (that conservatives are dumber than liberals).

It indicates no such thing. What it indicates is that people with a higher level of education are more likely to be socially liberal, not that liberals are more educated than conservatives. And intelligence doesn’t even enter into it.

> [@](#):
>
> a) How do you account in the third empirical fact that the higher one’s level of education, the higher one’s income?

Um, there’s no inherent contradiction here. Well-educated, wealthy people are perforce more likely to be socially liberal and economically conservative than people with lower levels of education and income. Why does the positive correlation between education and income matter in this regard at all–especially given that the correlation isn’t absolute (that is, there exist many educated, non-wealthy people, as well as a nonzero number of less-educated people with high incomes)?

> [@](#):
>
> b) You specifically called out **social** liberal-ness and **economic** conservative-ness. You used the word “Conversely”, which specifically implies that the two sentences were opposites. Yet, social conservativism/liberalism and economic conservativism/liberalism are two different beasts. How do you account for this?

Account for what? Perhaps “conversely” was the wrong choice of words. What about “additionally?”

Anyway, I’d argue–and have argued–that the dominant political ideology in this country, particularly in terms of institutional policy, is a centrism which is fairly socially liberal and fairly economically conservative. Which makes sense, because most social and political institutions in this country are run by people who are both well-educated and wealthy relative to the population as a whole.

> [@](#):
>
> c) Cites please.

I’m looking. I’m pretty sure it’s either from a Pew survey or an NES survey. Or both.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2001, 12:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/25 "2001-03-17T00:30:01Z")

</div>

[Here’s](http://www.people-press.org/fit/fit.htm) an overview of the Pew Research Center’s ten political typologies. It provides a rough concurrence of the correlations in question here.

It also has a [survey](http://www.people-press.org/fit/fit-survey.htm) you can take to find out where you might fit on the axis.

For those who don’t know, [url=“[http://www.people-press.org/moreabout.htm](http://www.people-press.org/moreabout.htm)”]Pew Research Center is an independent research group that used to be the Times-Mirror Center for the People & the Press. To my knowledge, their survey results are respected within the political science and journalist communities as being trustworthy and free of ideological bias. If someone has information that contradicts Pew’s neutrality, I’d like to hear it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2001, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/26 "2001-03-17T00:34:30Z")

</div>

[This](http://www.umich.edu/~nes/) is the website of the National Election Studies at the University of Michigan. I believe they have data on income/ideology and education/ideology correlation–I have to be off-line for a while right now, but I’ll check it out later tonight. Feel free to do the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2001, 6:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/27 "2001-03-17T06:20:55Z")

</div>

FWIW, after controlling for other demographics both education and IQ are positively correlated with wages.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SPOOFE](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c5a1d2/32.png) [@SPOOFE](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SPOOFE)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2001, 6:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/28 "2001-03-17T06:23:22Z")

</div>

Well, keep in mind that IQ isn’t the only means of measuring intelligence. And schooling isn’t the only means of gaining intelligence.

(Not to dispute Gad’s assertions, of course)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bill\_H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a5b964/32.png) [@Bill\_H](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bill_H)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2001, 8:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/29 "2001-03-17T08:40:41Z")

</div>

**Gadarene** , I don’t mean to be harsh here, but you just took up a lot of screen space when the one sentance would have sufficed:

> [@](#):
>
> Perhaps “conversely” was the wrong choice of words. What about “additionally?”

No problem. Complete retraction of your original statement accepted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bill\_H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a5b964/32.png) [@Bill\_H](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bill_H)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2001, 8:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/30 "2001-03-17T08:41:43Z")

</div>

I do appreciate the cites. Very interesting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bill\_H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a5b964/32.png) [@Bill\_H](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bill_H)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2001, 9:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/31 "2001-03-17T09:16:05Z")

</div>

Gadarene\*\*, I took the pew survey and was shocked to be told I’m a “staunch republican”.

I’d considered myself fairly moderate. For example, I’m pro-gay, pro-choice, neutral-to-barly-anti-guns, atheist. I’m not a strong supporter of additional military. I’m a big believer in spending bucks on education. I’m anti-social security, and anti-farmers. Hell, now that I list them out there, I’m surprised I’m even a republican.

Anyway, either a) this pew thing isn’t all that accurate in their analysis, or b) I should really start listening to Limbaugh (I can’t stand him).

Their site does have some interesting reading though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2001, 10:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/32 "2001-03-17T10:14:21Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Bill H. \*  
> **Gadarene** , I don’t mean to be harsh here, but you just took up a lot of screen space when the one sentance would have sufficed:
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > Perhaps “conversely” was the wrong choice of words. What about “additionally?”
> 
> No problem. Complete retraction of your original statement accepted.

I wasn’t aware that I was retracting anything, other than the word “conversely.” What are you talking about?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Milossarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Milossarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Milossarian)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2001, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/33 "2001-03-17T15:46:48Z")

</div>

Point him in the right direction, and I bet Ronald Reagan could _still_ whip Jimmy Carter’s peanut-plantin’ ass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bill\_H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a5b964/32.png) [@Bill\_H](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bill_H)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2001, 1:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/34 "2001-03-18T01:23:32Z")

</div>

**Gadarene** wrote

> [@](#):
>
> I wasn’t aware that I was retracting anything, other than the word “conversely.” What are you talking about?

From Webster, here’s the definition of “Converse”

> [@](#):
>
> 1 : reversed in order, relation, or action  
> 2 : being a logical or mathematical converse

And “Addition”

> [@](#):
>
> 1 : a part added (as to a building or residential section)  
> 2 : the result of adding

As you can see, these two words are quite different, in fact they are practically opposites.

Your changing your statement by changing the word “conversely” to “additionally” completely retracts the original statement and creates a new one. That’s fine. I completely agree with the new one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2001, 4:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/35 "2001-03-18T04:07:26Z")

</div>

That’s fine, **Bill**. But you apparently have issues with my statement beyond the use of the word “conversely,” as you’ve laid out in yesterday’s post dated 3:11 pm. I addressed those issues (in my post of 3:56), and answered one of your several points by retracting “conversely.” This, however, does not indicate a “complete retraction of my original statement,” as you say it does. Substituting “additionally” for “conversely” doesn’t change the empirical worth of the statement, nor does it mitigate my responses to your concerns about the data.

The new statement is as follows:

> [@](#):
>
> There is empirical evidence to indicate that the higher one’s level of education, the more likely one is to be socially liberal. Additionally, the higher one’s income, the more likely one is to be economically conservative.

If you “completely agree” with this, then may I assume that you’re withdrawing concern a) in yesterday’s post?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bill\_H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a5b964/32.png) [@Bill\_H](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bill_H)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2001, 8:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/36 "2001-03-18T08:24:05Z")

</div>

**Gadarene** wrote

> [@](#):
>
> If you “completely agree” with this, then may I assume that you’re withdrawing concern a) in yesterday’s post?

Yes. Perhaps my phrasings above were more hostile than necessary, and if so I apologize. My interpretation of your original comment was that fact #a (which I agreed with) plus fact #b (which I also agreed with) proved that liberals were smarter than conservatives (which I disagreed with). The new comment (or my new understanding of the original comment) says #a and #b are facts and are interesting, but don’t allow us to conclude any intellectual champion. All of which I agree with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2001, 5:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/37 "2001-03-18T17:59:14Z")

</div>

I just work from the premise that I’m smarter than everyone else. Proof? I’m not going to tell you if I’m liberal or conservative.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2001, 1:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/38 "2001-03-19T01:37:11Z")

</div>

Fair enough, **Bill**. And I agree with your last post. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Astroboy14](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/df705f/32.png) [@Astroboy14](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Astroboy14)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2001, 5:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/39 "2001-03-19T05:54:12Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> #a and #b are facts and are interesting, but don’t allow us to conclude any intellectual champion.

Fact _number_ a? Fact _number_ b? 😕  
[sup]Just thought I’d pop in and point that out…[/sup]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2001, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188/40 "2001-03-19T19:11:01Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Milossarian \*  
> \*\*Point him in the right direction, and I bet Ronald Reagan could _still_ whip Jimmy Carter’s peanut-plantin’ ass. \*\*

Yeah, but that’s only because Carter would be too polite to strike back against the empty-minded geriatric dinosaur. Ronnie would probably be in the middle of a flashback during filming of _Iwo Jima_ or somesuch.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-liberals-dumber-than-conservatives/58188.md?page=1)
