# Are 'pi' and 'e' related?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 26, 2001, 1:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155 "2001-06-26T01:42:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Indistinguishable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/90ced4/32.png) [@Indistinguishable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Indistinguishable)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2015, 6:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/21 "2015-07-17T18:20:07Z")

</div>

[Also relevant xkcd](https://xkcd.com/217/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Isilder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/cc9497/32.png) [@Isilder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Isilder)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2015, 9:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/22 "2015-07-17T21:56:57Z")

</div>

> [@zekrommaster11](#):
>
> One amazing relation that I found out: ln(pi)=1/logbasepi(e) ~~ 1.144729… I found this out using desmos and tested it out by graphing, it works. 🙂

Napiers bones, the slide rule… they work because addition and substraction of logs is multiplication and division of the subjects …

as in X/Y = z ^ ( log z X - log z Y ) … for any z

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2015, 1:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/23 "2015-07-18T01:33:57Z")

</div>

> [@zekrommaster11](#):
>
> One amazing relation that I found out: ln(pi)=1/logbasepi(e) ~~ 1.144729… I found this out using desmos and tested it out by graphing, it works. 🙂

That’s nothing. Not when you consider the fact that 6π[sup]5[/sup] = [proton to electron mass ratio](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-to-electron_mass_ratio)

😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![standingwave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9de0a6/32.png) [@standingwave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/standingwave)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2015, 3:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/24 "2015-07-18T03:17:46Z")

</div>

My favorite:

**pi^4 + pi^5 = e^6**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2015, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/25 "2015-07-18T03:36:21Z")

</div>

> [@standingwave](#):
>
> My favorite:
> 
> **pi^4 + pi^5 = e^6**

Never saw that before. Excellent. Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2015, 3:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/26 "2015-07-18T03:42:52Z")

</div>

> [@KarlGauss](#):
>
> That’s nothing. Not when you consider the fact that 6π[sup]5[/sup] = [proton to electron mass ratio](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-to-electron_mass_ratio)
> 
> 😉

The fact that pi would show up in something spherical is simply geometry. Nothing surprising at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hellestal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3ab097/32.png) [@Hellestal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hellestal)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2015, 3:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/27 "2015-07-18T03:49:59Z")

</div>

> [@standingwave](#):
>
> My favorite:
> 
> **pi^4 + pi^5 = e^6**

Pretty sure that’s an approximation, not a perfect equation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2015, 3:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/28 "2015-07-18T03:57:43Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> The fact that pi would show up in something spherical is simply geometry. Nothing surprising at all.

[Quote=Hellestal]

Originally Posted by standingwave  
My favorite:

**pi^4 + pi^5 = e^6**  
Pretty sure that’s an approximation, not a perfect equation.  
[/quote]

Whoosh. And whoosh. Unless I’m being whooshed (twice).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![standingwave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9de0a6/32.png) [@standingwave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/standingwave)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2015, 4:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/29 "2015-07-18T04:06:30Z")

</div>

> [@Hellestal](#):
>
> Pretty sure that’s an approximation, not a perfect equation.

True. A very close approximation to be sure, like the second xkcd toon posted above. Close enough to drive people nuts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2015, 8:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/30 "2015-07-18T08:53:02Z")

</div>

It would have been less misleading to write π[sup]4[/sup] + π[sup]5[/sup] = e[sup]5.999999956…[/sup]Wikipedia has a nice page of such close approximations, but I can’t find that page right now. Is this one on it? Anyway, it does seem remarkable!

Another famous approximation is e[sup]π √163[/sup] = 262537412640768743.999999999999…  
This is related to some number theory; how about π[sup]4[/sup] + π[sup]5[/sup] = e[sup]5.999999956…[/sup] ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2015, 9:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155/31 "2015-07-18T09:23:24Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> Another famous approximation is e[sup]π √163[/sup] = 262537412640768743.999999999999…

Oops. I should have added a few more digits  
e[sup]π √163[/sup] = 262537412640768743.999999999999250…  
to emphasize that the infamous .99999999999999999999999999999… (which _is_ an integer) was not intended. 🙂

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-pi-and-e-related/70155.md?page=1)
