Are there any great works of literature that are not funny?

Still, you wouldn’t call a Greek tragedy humorless, certainly not drab, or dull, or simply dark, or boring. While tragic irony may not be humor per se, I think it may function in a way sort of like humor (and twist endings in more contemporary literature or film are sort of the same thing): One theory about why jokes are funny says that a joke works by creating an expectation, and then subverting that expectation in the punchline. The realization that something is different from what we expected, or, by extension, that a familiar structure has been turned on its head, creates a release. In jokes, it makes us laugh, in tragedy, it makes us… want to go kill ourselves. Well, either that, or experience catharsis, I suppose, if you believe Aristotle.

Hmm… did I just have a thought? :dubious:

Goes off to start writing thesis

I can’t think of much humor in Poe’s best or best-known work, but he did attempt a few humorous, satiric pieces, such as “A Predicament” and “Never Bet the Devil Your Head.”

Some of Poe’s stories are outright comedy, such as “The Man That Was Used Up” and “X-ing a Paragrab.”

That sounds hilarious. Really.

Why don’t I read more Euripides?

Right, I get that, I just don’t get how ministryman thinks it constitutes humor. I’m not trying to be prudish; but if something like this occurred in a great film like Pulp Fiction, I don’t see how it’d be a humorous part of the film. Not that it’d necessarily be a bad part, just that it wouldn’t be a funny part.
I suppose it’s just an example of how far some people will stretch the Bible to try to make it a relateable [sic?] document, like trying to point out how it has its funny moments. It doesn’t.

The lawyer (Jaggers is his name) provides some of the funniest scenes in the book, actually; especially when he has his clients and clerks recruiting perjurious witnesses but insists (loudly and furiously!) on maintaining full deniability.

The bit in Catcher in the Rye where Holden, expelled from his school and departing his dorm late at night, screams, “SLEEP TIGHT, MOTHERFUCKERS!” (or words to that effect) is the closest thing to a funny bit in the book. And at that, it’s the kind of funny that will never get an actual laugh unless read out loud in an English class, or used in a screen-adaptation.

Well, there’s one or two dryly funny bits in “The Cask of Amontillado.”

“THE thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could; but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge.”

“Luchesi cannot tell Amontillado from Sherry.” (Amontillado is a kind of sherry.)

“There were no attendants at home; they had absconded to make merry in honor of the time. I had told them that I should not return until the morning, and had given them explicit orders not to stir from the house. These orders were sufficient, I well knew, to insure their immediate disappearance, one and all, as soon as my back was turned.”

*“No one attacks me with impunity,” or, more whimsically translated, “Don’t tread on me.” Foreshadowing the end of the story, you see.

I just finished reading “The Sun Also Rises”. There were a number of scenes in which the characters were doing things that *they *found humorous (at least some of them), but I don’t think there was a single thing in the entire novel that I’d call “funny”.

Caesar’s bell. Gall. Has absolutely no humor. The great war epics have word play, and some funny-ish bits, but Caesar is the greatest writer of literature who is always serious, all the time. Perhaps he didn’t intend his work as literature, but it is considered such today, unlike, for example, the scholastics or some purely didactic poems. The extant fragments I’ve read from e.g. Epicurus are not funny, but not really literature, either.

under the volcano? Fun but not really funny. Joseph roth’s books aren’t that funny, nor are Broch’s. hölderlin not that funny, nor Rilke. D’aubigné’s les tragiques isn’t funny iirc about the bartholomew day massacres. Maurice scève isn’t really funny either, but the word play is fun. But not funny.

Any humor in William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying and Sanctuary must’ve passed me by, if it was there.

I don’t think I cracked a smile once reading Crime and Punishment. Or for days afterwards.

:slight_smile:
Jude the Obscure…no, his thinking that foreign languages were adding “o” at the end of English words…
Ah! Tess of the D’Ubervilles.

Wuthering Heights. The nearest thing to comic relief is Joseph, and him you just want to shoot.

There was nothing even slightly funny in Ayn Rand’s Fountainhead or Anthem, if they even count as literature. Never read Atlas Shrugged, but I’ve never read or heard anything about it that would lead me to expect a single chuckle.

There is nothing funny in Plato’s Republic. Not much funny in even the lightest of the dialogues, really, not even the Symposium.

I remember one of my friends saying she thought the scene where Heathcliff and Isabelle (?) got into an argument that involved the throwing of knives to be fairly amusing.

:confused: Maybe I’m just sleepy and missing a whoosh, but my favorite thing about Chandler is how he makes me giggle with a hilarious turn of phrase on virtually every page. Some samples

No, they’re not. People have been dissing Caesar as near illiterate as makes no nevermind for millennia.

Me? I love the ablative absolute.

? The style of Caesar is, from what I know, pretty much sui generis. Nobody has any love for Jerome’s vulgate style, but it’s way more illiterate and coarse than Caesar. Caesar is probably still taught for second year HS students as literature many places. Yeah I guess he does use a lot of the absolute, but I’d bet Vergil uses the absolute far more often. It’s a convenient way to express something quickly and clearly, which is the whole point of those little war reports. What is funny to me is that Caesar always has the barbarians speak in grunts and horrible Latin, whereas Caesar’s own dialogue is proto-Ciceronian in parataxis and polish. I take it back – that still makes me laugh. But I read Caesar when I want to read terse, effective prose with restricted diction – fun, but not funny, except probably inadvertently so.

General Sternwood: “Have you met my daughter?”

Phillip Marlowe: “Yes, she tried to sit in my lap. I was standing up at the time.”

Perhaps that isn’t humorous, but indicative of…whats her name…Carmine?..being totally whacko.