Are There Any Legal Restrictions On Political Speech for Resident Aliens in the USA?

That’s from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution. It has no official legal standing.

The U.S. does not deny citizenship to or deport individuals for expressing opinions on politics or other matters, a likely exception being exhortations to violence.

“X politician is an ass” would be fine, “Kill X politician”, not so much.

The OP’s Danish student could use one of those courses immigrants have to pass to gain citizenship.

Maybe so, but SOMEBODY told her not to speak out on politics. Possibly her parents, perhaps someone else.

I’m pretty sure she’s safe, but I don’t want to lie to her. She’s certainly not going to get punished for any opinion offered in my class, and I sure wouldn’t report her if there WERE any rules prohibiting her from speaking out. But I’d like to reassure her there’s no danger at all in speaking her mind.

Would I be right to reassure her, or are there any immigration rules I’m unaware of?

You can tell her she has exactly the same free speech rights as any citizen. And you can tell her I said so.

She’s not a citizen.
She’s only allowed to stay in the US till the date when her visa expires.
After which it must be renewed, and the renewal process involves faceless bureaucrats with the authority to ruin your life.
She and her partents are wise to be careful.

Suppose in a class discussion, she says something like “sometimes I feel empathy for the Arabs. After all, the US did invade Iraq unnecesarily, so I can understand why they hate us.”
Other kids could slam her on Facebook for supporting terrorists.

And when some faceless bureacrat decides not to renew her visa because she’s a terrorist, there is no easy appeal process.

I have no cite, but I have heard similar cautions from other green card holders. It may not be in American law, but I believe it is a widely held (some of the few people I know with green cards talked about it) opinion. I suspect it is just a “be careful” attitude, but it isn’t unique to one person.

You know, I think if I were in her position I’d have those fears too and I’d probably keep any opinions that might be considered radical to myself until my US citizenship was secure. Sure, there might be nothing to it, and from the above responses it seems there isn’t, but I’d be figuring that it never hurts to be careful, especially if it’s only for a limited period.

For what? Being TOO white? She’s from Denmark.

Permanent residency (green card) doesn’t expire. That’s why it’s permanent. It’s true that it can be revoked upon conviction of certain crimes (including immigration fraud) but there’s no renewal process involved generally.

This all assumes that the student is in fact a permanent resident and not some other status.

To clarify: you do have to renew the actual green card itself when it expires, just like any photo ID, but that doesn’t affect your actual immigration status. You’re a permanent resident until you do something to get kicked out.

Denmark?!?

Hotbed of socialism?!?

Who let her in to corrupt the youth?!?

So, in light of this weekend’s events, is everybody still convinced that the Danish student’s parents are silly to be worried about what she might say in class?

That they shouldn’t worry that saying the wrong thing might get their green card cancelled by a stroke of a pen held in tiny little hands?

The wife, who is a green-card holder, hates Trump just as much as I do, but I always caution her not to be too outspoken until she becomes a citizen. Better safe than sorry. It helps that Hawaii is a solidly blue state, and almost everyone here hates Trump too.

Please. What exactly in this weekend’s events has to do with what green card holders say in the U.S.?

It would not surprise me at all if Trump decided to try to deport any outspoken green-card holders, or at least the ones speaking out against him.

Moderator Note

Northern Piper, you should know very well that political jabs are not permitted in General Questions.

Colibri
General Questions Moderator

Since the factual aspects of this have been answered, and it continues to be the target of political sniping, I’m going to close this.