Are there any theories on WHY such large stones were used to build the pyrimids?

  1. So this demonstrates that time *was *an issue,making my case for me. If time wasn’t an issue why not work year round?

  2. What you just posted is almost word for word what I wrote in the very first reply.

Frank Loyd Wright wasn’t around to invent the leaky roof and cement chair?

I’m not married to the theory in any way but I just thought it was interesting. I thought it would have died in the 70’s when it came out.

This is probably less important over all, but the internal galleries all have cantilevered ceilings (can’t remember the architectural term) where each course jutted out a bit more until the 2 sides met.

Is part of the idea of structural stability the fact that large stones require more force before they crack? Just curious.

IANA engineer, but I assume that’s part of it.

Another part is that large stones have more surface area and so have more friction with adjoining stones stones. Take a pile of bricks and stack them into a 10’ cube and give them a light shake. The bricks on the corners will fall off. Keep shaking and the whole pile will turn to rubble in short order. Make the same stack out of 1’ blocks and you’ll have to shake a lot harder. Use 2’ blocks and you’ll just about have to turn the stack side on to make the blocks move.

Having not died out adds nothing. By that reasoning the proponants of the Kennedy assasination, 9-11 truthers, moon landing hoaxers, chariots of the gods, flat earth believers and so on should have dropped their beliefs long ago.