# Are these ancient trees are unsalvageable?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 31, 2012, 12:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429 "2012-10-31T12:58:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biggirl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/biggirl/32/3294_2.png) [@Biggirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biggirl)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2012, 12:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/1 "2012-10-31T12:58:17Z")

</div>

One of the big killers here in NYC during the storm was trees. In my nabe there are many, many trees and shrubs torn from the ground.

My husband is chairman of the Prospect Park CommCom and has been getting reports of many, many downed trees. All over the internet there are pictures of ancient trees with roots bigger than mini-vans ripped from the earth by the winds. According to hubby, it is the more healthy trees that are more likely to be ripped up by storm winds because they are more sturdy and unbending with a much larger canopy to catch the wind.

My question is: can’t these trees be re-planted? If not, why not? It seems such a shame to lose a magnificent 100 year old oak.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2012, 1:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/2 "2012-10-31T13:11:12Z")

</div>

After the [Great Storm of 1987](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Storm_of_1987), there were a lot of downed trees - some of those that had just tipped over with fairly intact root balls were rescued - crown reduced, tipped back upright and in some cases, anchored in place with guy ropes or spikes driven through the root ball into the surrounding earth.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quercus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/7ab992/32.png) [@Quercus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quercus)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2012, 3:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/3 "2012-10-31T15:32:30Z")

</div>

The problem is going to be that, most of the time, you don’t have a tipped-over tree with all its roots intact. You’re going to have a tipped-over tree with some portion of the very large roots intact, a much smaller amount of the small-to-medium roots intact, and very few of the tiny root hairs intact. Since the root hairs are where all the water and nutrient absorbtion happen, the tree is pretty significantly damaged, and even if you put it back in the ground (not trivial with a big tree) the tree is pretty likely to die quickly anyway.  
As mangetout said, it’s possible to survive, if a whole bunch of dirt comes up with the roots, then much of the smaller hairs might be intact, and if you cut off a bunch of branches and leaves (so the tree needs less water), there might be enough roots left for the tree to survive. But that’s not the typical case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Floater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/dc4da7/32.png) [@Floater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Floater)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2012, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/4 "2012-10-31T16:07:04Z")

</div>

There may also be cracks in the tree trunk that aren’t visible from the outside.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2012, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/5 "2012-10-31T16:16:12Z")

</div>

Some smaller trees could potentially be saved. But few will have the resources or time available to do this.

After the New England hurricane of 1938 I believe it took years for all the downed trees to be salvaged for lumber.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ostrya](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/35a633/32.png) [@Ostrya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ostrya)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2012, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/6 "2012-10-31T16:16:20Z")

</div>

To add to what **Quercus** said, not only are the feeder roots (root hairs) responsible for nutrient uptake but that’s where cell division responsible for all root elongation takes place; those cells at the feeder root tips.

The main axis of the roots increase in diameter as the tree grows, but any and all elongation occurs at the tips. Feeder roots become old (eventually become conductive tissues) and need to be replaced. The elongation process is what produces new ones.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broomstick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/broomstick/32/246_2.png) [@Broomstick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broomstick)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2012, 4:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/7 "2012-10-31T16:20:41Z")

</div>

The only practical and cost-effective way to “salvage” those downed trees is converting them to lumber.

Sure, a very, very few could but replanted but I question if that’s a good use of resources.

Clear the downed ones out and plants new ones. Sorry, I understand you’ll miss the old, stately giants, but circle of life and everything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Philster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/13edae/32.png) [@Philster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Philster)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2012, 4:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/8 "2012-10-31T16:48:15Z")

</div>

Propping them up, cutting the crown (so the smaller roots can meet the required/reduced load) and anchoring them is not as good as having a fully rooted and healthy tree.

It’s propping up another danger.

In some cases, it might be okay. In populated areas? No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colophon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f05b48/32.png) [@Colophon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colophon)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2012, 7:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/9 "2012-10-31T19:07:45Z")

</div>

> [@Quercus](#):
>
> The problem is going to be that, most of the time, you don’t have a tipped-over tree with all its roots intact…

And today’s Apropos Username Award goes to…

And then we’ve also got Broom **stick** , **Floater** (hey, logs float OK?), **Jackmanii** (more of a shrub), the lone **cashew** , and **Mangetout** (OK, that’s a real stretch). The whole vegetable kingdom is here…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Toxylon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/f05b48/32.png) [@Toxylon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Toxylon)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2012, 8:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/10 "2012-11-01T08:46:29Z")

</div>

Even scavenging the trees for lumber may not be an option. Like **Floater** said, when big trees come down in a storm, the trunks often suffer severe damage despite staying in one piece, effectively preventing conversion into useful lumber. With the unprecedently bad storms that have swept Northern Europe in the past couple of summers, landowners here have learned that they have tonnes of grade C firewood where once stood a high-euro sea of first-class lumber. I think trees in the Eastern U.S. might fare better, as they are not as tall and thin as the Nordic conifers, and they have a much wider, stronger crown ostensibly cushioning the blow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Floater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/dc4da7/32.png) [@Floater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Floater)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2012, 11:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/11 "2012-11-01T11:09:40Z")

</div>

The aftermath of [this storm](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone_Gudrun) was years of trains and lorries transporting timber to paper mills all over Sweden just because it was unsuitable as lumber. [Here are some photos](https://www.google.com/search?as_st=y&tbm=isch&hl=en&as_q=gudrun&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&imgsz=&imgar=&imgc=&imgcolor=&imgtype=&cr=&as_sitesearch=&safe=images&as_filetype=&as_rights=&biw=1024&bih=619&sei=lFeSULGaFszc4QS7o4DYBw#hl=en&as_st=y&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=stormen+gudrun&oq=stormen+gudrun&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24.24952.26663.0.27772.8.8.0.0.0.2.162.486.6j2.8.0...0.0...1c.1.6wpgUrWJ_JA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=932c8cf2c8aa11c3&bpcl=37189454&biw=1024&bih=619) of what it looked like afterwards. I especially like [this one](http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&hl=en&as_st=y&biw=1024&bih=619&tbm=isch&tbnid=dEH-e0HKz2gFmM:&imgrefurl=http://www.svt.se/svt/road/Classic/article/615/jsp/Render.jsp%3Fa%3D551003%26d%3D45955%26index%3D0%26popup%3Dtrue&docid=KkMGCliuhH7xmM&imgurl=http://www.svt.se/content/1/c6/55/10/03/bild1_3101694.jpg&w=500&h=333&ei=sFeSUNGzDYem4gTRvYHwDg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=475&vpy=39&dur=63&hovh=183&hovw=275&tx=122&ty=104&sig=107821222095641573253&sqi=2&page=1&tbnh=130&tbnw=197&start=0&ndsp=13&ved=1t:429,i:75).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maastricht](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a88e57/32.png) [@Maastricht](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Maastricht)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2012, 11:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/12 "2012-11-01T11:19:06Z")

</div>

Your husband could ask cost estimates from tree surgeons.

Is it possible to tip the trees back, and just let the living part of the tree stand? Many really old threes I know are three parts dead, and the trunk is short there. But the one quarter that is still alive is thriving.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maastricht](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a88e57/32.png) [@Maastricht](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Maastricht)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2012, 11:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/13 "2012-11-01T11:20:11Z")

</div>

I’ve heard that old hollow trees often weather storms better then solid trees.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cartooniverse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cartooniverse/32/3084_2.png) [@Cartooniverse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cartooniverse)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2012, 12:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/14 "2012-11-01T12:32:57Z")

</div>

At the other end of the city, we went for a walk through [Astoria Park](http://0.tqn.com/d/queens/1/0/7/A/astoria-park.jpg). Quite a few large trees upended. Oddly, all at the southeast corner of the park. We went throughout the park and found no other old growth had fallen.

Tragic, and yet I cannot imagine the city diverting resources to try to upright and secure old growth. They have to prioritize and the use of heavy equipment in the coming days/ weeks/ months should be directed towards lower Manhattan and Breezy Point. ( IMHO of course ).

Glad you and yours are safe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9fc348/32.png) [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Flying_Dutchman)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2012, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/15 "2012-11-01T13:38:50Z")

</div>

My neighbour just took down 3 healthy Balsam Fir trees (3 ft diameter) which landed with such a thunderous thud that it shook my house.

There’s no way I’d come anywhere near such a tree that had been replanted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bridget\_Burke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7cd45c/32.png) [@Bridget\_Burke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bridget_Burke)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2012, 4:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-these-ancient-trees-are-unsalvageable/639429/16 "2012-11-01T16:40:08Z")

</div>

> [@Maastricht](#):
>
> Your husband could ask cost estimates from tree surgeons.
> 
> Is it possible to tip the trees back, and just let the living part of the tree stand? Many really old threes I know are three parts dead, and the trunk is short there. But the one quarter that is still alive is thriving.

Strolling through my neighborhood after Hurricane Ike, I noticed that many of the downed trees (or limbs) were not healthy. Those 3/4 dead old trees are just waiting for a strong wind. Or a coating of ice. Then, over they go! From my observation, I would say that old, hollow trees are\* not\* good at weathering storms. (Houston lost more trees in the drought of 2011.)

But my neighborhood is far inland–we just had wind. The same storm briefly submerged most of Galveston. Due to the seawall & grade raising, results were not as destructive & deadly as the [1900 Storm](http://www.1900storm.com/). But most of the century old live oaks died from Ike’s bath in salt water. Since they mostly remained standing, the [lumber could be salvaged](http://txforestservice.tamu.edu/main/popup.aspx?id=8768)…
