# Are wider tires more susceptible to hydroplaning?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [August 16, 2009, 8:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654 "2009-08-16T20:28:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duhkecco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/8491ac/32.png) [@Duhkecco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duhkecco)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2009, 8:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/1 "2009-08-16T20:28:27Z")

</div>

Seems that there’s an argument both ways:

1. The extra width offers more traction which reduces hydroplaning on wet roads.
2. The extra width provides a wider “wing” that leads to more hydroplaning. (Similar to the “snowplow effect” of wide tires in heavy snow.)

Which one is it?  
Thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![R.P.McMurphy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/7993a0/32.png) [@R.P.McMurphy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/R.P.McMurphy)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2009, 9:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/2 "2009-08-16T21:21:24Z")

</div>

I can see where this thread is going . . .

Let’s start with the fact that hydroplaning involves a lot of factors other than tire width such as tread design, size, channeling, composition, tire pressure, etc.

Everything else being equal I’d say that the narrower the tire, the less likely to hydroplane. The reason is that there is a smaller footprint, meaning that the weight of the vehicle is concentrated on a smaller area causing more pressure on the road. Therefore, it is less likely that anything can come between the tire and the road surface.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duhkecco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/8491ac/32.png) [@Duhkecco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duhkecco)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2009, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/3 "2009-08-16T22:37:48Z")

</div>

> [@Spartydog](#):
>
> I can see where this thread is going . . .

😕

I’ve Googled and I get conflicting answers from message boards and blogs, but nothing from tire manufacturers or from sites that test and review cars.

For example, there’s this from [Why not?](http://www.whynot.net/ideas/64):

> [@](#):
>
> With street tires, the wider the tire, the more prone to hydroplaning it will be.

This from [Automotive Forums](http://www.automotiveforums.com/t937168-pros_and_cons_of_wider_tires.html):

> [@](#):
>
> Pros [for wider tires]: Much better traction, more stable, generally better tire wear because you’ll build up less temperature, looks better, much better in the rain, better braking action

And, this from an [SDMB post](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=4916070&postcount=23):

> [@](#):
>
> I believe you are referring to WIDER tires here. Yes, that will help braking a bit. It also makes the car much more prone to hydroplaning in the wet.

I’m looking for an authoritative source that has an answer based on specific testing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Philster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/13edae/32.png) [@Philster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Philster)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/4 "2009-08-17T00:07:28Z")

</div>

> **[Aquaplaning](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroplaning_(tires))**
>
> Aquaplaning or hydroplaning by the tires of a road vehicle, aircraft or other wheeled vehicle occurs when a layer of water builds between the wheels of the vehicle and the road surface, leading to a loss of traction that prevents the vehicle from responding to control inputs. If it occurs to all wheels simultaneously, the vehicle becomes, in effect, an uncontrolled sled. Aquaplaning is a different phenomenon from when water on the surface of the roadway merely acts as a lubricant. Traction is dim...

[http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=16](http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=16)  
Tire Rack is well respected. They mention the need for, and benefits of, water channeling grooves on wide, high performace tires (many Plus One and Plus Two applications) to resist hydroplaning that they are more prone to.

Goodyear: When designing wider tires for high performance use on street vehicles like the Corvette in the mid-80’s, they needed to adopt the ‘Gatorback’ (Goodyear Eagles V-rated tires) unidirectional, water-channeling tread design from the F1 race cars to make it resist hydroplaning, because the new 50 series tires for street use were quite wide and introduced a new set of problems in the wet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![R.P.McMurphy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/7993a0/32.png) [@R.P.McMurphy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/R.P.McMurphy)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/5 "2009-08-17T00:41:01Z")

</div>

> [@Duhkecco](#):
>
> 😕
> 
> I’ve Googled and I get conflicting answers from message boards and blogs, but nothing from tire manufacturers or from sites that test and review cars.
> 
> For example, there’s this from [Why not?](http://www.whynot.net/ideas/64):This from [Automotive Forums](http://www.automotiveforums.com/t937168-pros_and_cons_of_wider_tires.html):And, this from an [SDMB post](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=4916070&postcount=23):I’m looking for an authoritative source that has an answer based on specific testing.

Yes, you should be 😕 because it is one of those issues where a multitude of factors have to be accounted for and therefore, make a factual answer very difficult.

When I say, "I can see where this thread is going . . . ", I mean that anyone that chimes in can cite one factor and try to use that to establish an argument.

A wide tire can be designed to be much more resistant to hydroplaning than a much narrower tire. That doesn’t mean that wide tires are more resistant. OTOH a narrow tire can be designed that will almost never hydroplane but its overall performance and wear will render the tire almost useless in practical applications. You can design a narrow tire that is very practical and has good performance yet is susceptible to hydroplaning (any smooth tread tire).

As with most things, you pick your poison.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ParentalAdvisory](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/53a042/32.png) [@ParentalAdvisory](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParentalAdvisory)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/6 "2009-08-17T00:56:48Z")

</div>

> [@Spartydog](#):
>
> I can see where this thread is going . . .

Me too, hydroplane on a treadmill?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duhkecco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/8491ac/32.png) [@Duhkecco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duhkecco)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/7 "2009-08-17T18:26:47Z")

</div>

> [@Spartydog](#):
>
> Yes, you should be 😕 because it is one of those issues where a multitude of factors have to be accounted for and therefore, make a factual answer very difficult.
> 
> When I say, "I can see where this thread is going . . . ", I mean that anyone that chimes in can cite one factor and try to use that to establish an argument.

:dubious: But, there’s only one factor here – the width of the tire. All other factors stay the same.

I’m not asking “What factors affect hydroplaning?” or “Which tires are least susceptible to hydroplaning?” or “How do tire manufacturers create tires that minimize hydroplaning”?

I’m asking “Are wider tires more susceptible to hydroplaning?”

Thanks for the attempts so far.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Philster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/13edae/32.png) [@Philster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Philster)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/8 "2009-08-17T20:14:37Z")

</div>

You’re on my frigging nerves with the ‘thanks for the attempts so far’. Studies don’t just come out and go, “Hey **Duhkecco** , wider tires are more susceptible to hydroplaning! Thanks for reading!”

Read the link below, and pay particular attention on page 9. There it explains WHY wider tires are more susceptible to hydroplaning.

Transportation Research Institute  
University of Michigan

_Page 9 quote:_

The project addressed a specific area of concern involving the control of heavy duty  
trucks on wetted pavement. The concern deals with the lightly-loaded, or near-empty  
condition in which truck, tractor, and semitrailer tires are less capable of providing good  
wet-traction performance. The traction handicap derives from the fact that the lightly loaded  
truck tire contacts the ground with a footprint which is \*\*rather short relative to its  
width \*\*such that there is risk on wet pavements of developing significant hydrodynamic  
pressures over a substantial portion of the tire’s contact length.  
Since the tire rolls in the longitudinal direction, a \*\*very short contact length  
dimension implies a very short time interval during which water on the roadway must be  
expelled from beneath the footprint. If the contact shape is short, but wide, a long escape  
path is presented \*\*for water flowing laterally while the short available time implies that very  
high water velocities must prevail if the fluid is to escape and thus allow the tire tread to  
engage the pavement. When tread depth is also low, even thin films of water will result in  
high levels of hydrodynamic pressure beneath the tire, since the groove volume available  
for receiving the water bulk is very limited. In deep water, classical hydroplaning appears  
to be possible within normal highway speeds, regardless of the tread depth condition.

Link to report.

[http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/867/2/79336.0001.001.pdf](http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/867/2/79336.0001.001.pdf)

What makes a tire “wide” is sorted in the wording. It’s relative to the length.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Philster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/13edae/32.png) [@Philster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Philster)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 8:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/9 "2009-08-17T20:29:12Z")

</div>

And a reference to NASA’s Langley aircraft tire friction performance investigations:

[http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16250009](http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16250009)

As noted: _Tests aimed at obtaining this needed data were initiated by researchers at Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) and NASA Langley. Results from these initial tests using a worn truck tire, an ASTM Specification Standard Tire for Pavement Skid Resistance Tests (E 501) and Specification for Smooth Tread Standard Tire for Special-Purpose Pavement Skid Resistance Tests (E 524) tires are discussed in this paper. The status of the work directed towards developing a new dynamic tire hydroplaning speed equation(s) is reviewed. During wet weather, highway vehicle operators are cautioned to be alert to the possibly lower hydroplaning speeds **because of the influence of tire footprint aspect ratio effects** when their vehicles are lightly loaded._  
My note: When speaking of ‘wider tires’, engineers are going to do what they should and avoid relative jargon/terms and stick to ‘aspect ratio’ speak. When a tire’s aspect ratio get lower (such as 60, 55, 50, 45 series tires), the tire gets “wider”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duhkecco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/8491ac/32.png) [@Duhkecco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duhkecco)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 8:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/10 "2009-08-17T20:29:57Z")

</div>

> [@Philster](#):
>
> You’re on my frigging nerves with the ‘thanks for the attempts so far’.

Sorry. I wasn’t being sarcastic. I was just saying that, even though I hadn’t yet received the answer that I was looking for, I appreciated what I had received.

And, thanks for your link. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Philster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/13edae/32.png) [@Philster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Philster)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/11 "2009-08-17T20:38:32Z")

</div>

What I am saying was that, to get motivated, I had to feel a little pissed off!

Seriously, a common theme that has developed is that weight per inch of tire contact area is important. Wider tires have more contact area (a 225/50 series tires has more road contact area, and is wider, than a 225/70 series tire). Truck trailers that are lightly loaded on (relatively) wide tires are going to show up a lot in studies, because they just aren’t pressing down hard enough per square inch to push the water out of the way. The wider tire spreads the load out, and it’s easier to have the hydraulic action lift the trailer. It’s easier to study the actions of a trailer, and it’s easier to find reports on them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duhkecco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/8491ac/32.png) [@Duhkecco](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duhkecco)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/12 "2009-08-17T22:35:37Z")

</div>

Makes sense.

So, it seems that there’s always a compromise between tires with low aspect ratios (which, I’m quite sure, offer better traction on dry pavement), and high aspect ratios for wet pavement, plus, additional considerations like handling, comfort, noise, durability, puncture-resistance, cold weather performance, and price.

And, as \*they \*say, tires are the only thing between the car and the road.

Thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Philster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/13edae/32.png) [@Philster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Philster)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2009, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-wider-tires-more-susceptible-to-hydroplaning/506654/13 "2009-08-17T22:48:12Z")

</div>

Unless there is water on the road, and the tire is hydroplaning. 🙂
