# Are you a racist? Warning signs

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [July 7, 2014, 8:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519 "2014-07-07T08:12:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 40

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/781 "2014-07-24T18:00:07Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> Why not? I fit your qualifications. I’m interested in defining racism and calling it out when I see it in myself and others.

I said “generally”.

The context of what I was saying was not about whether you were or were not dishonest. I described a category of what I would object to on grounds of dishonesty. If it happened to fit you that was incidental to the point I was making at that time.

> [@](#):
>
> As for your “complaints” as I called them, you said:
> 
> So, you are happy to be called a racist so long as no one attempts to call you the bad sort of racist. How is this not a complaint about being called the bad sort of racist is beyond me.

Assuming that I was responding to someone who had actually called me that, you might have something. As it is …

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> I don’t understand this at all.

The fact that many experts who are familiar with the evidence and supposed to base their opinions on an assessment of the evidence felt there was likely some genetic component tends to weaken your assertion that there is “no evidence” of any genetic component. You parried this by suggesting (post #734) that they were basing their contrary positions on “_suspicions, feelings, etc. about the subject_”. This amounts to a claim about the opinions of these scientists (and contrary to your assertion in post #771 that you have made no such claims) and it’s at that point that their motivation for holding those positions became relevant.

> [@](#):
>
> I would probably argue against this guy, but in a different way (and with a different tone). I would say that there’s no genetic evidence of these differences, and no evidence of some other kind that points exclusively to genes as a cause. I would also show him the evidence, like the Scarr study, that specifically refutes the idea the genes are involved.

In that case it would behoove you to ascertain that your various opponents in these discussions are actually saying what you presume them to be saying - that genetic factors account for the entire disparity - before carrying on as you do.

Personally I think it’s ludicrous to think that genetic factors account for the entire discrepancy between the general populations of whites versus blacks, and I doubt if anyone is actually making this claim. (It might be that someone is making that claim about certain tests which measured specific supposedly normalized cohorts.)

[IIRC, people have pointed this issue - specifically that the presence of environmental factors doesn’t mean that there are not also genetic factors - to you in the past, but I can’t be bothered to hunt this down just now, and I could be wrong.]

> [@](#):
>
> In short, I would tell him that I think it’s not reasonable to believe, at this point, and based on the evidence available, that this gap is caused by anything other than what caused the myriad of other gaps (academic, economic, criminal, social, etc.) we’ve seen in history – discrimination, oppression, persecution, and the like.

OK. But you would agree then, that for purposes of your argument with that hypothetical guy holding that hypothetical position, the third and fourth sentences of your post #734 - and all this discussion of the “best explanation” generally - are moot. Correct?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![levdrakon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@levdrakon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/levdrakon)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/782 "2014-07-24T18:00:10Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> I don’t think you’d actually hit a woman for fear of getting your ass kicked. You just talk shit about them on the internet. (Also, I’m a guy, but being wrong about everything is kind of your deal, so why quit now?)

Oh, I just like giving hateful man-hater feminists a hard time once in awhile, usually in the pit. You’re a self-righteous Heather who holds grudges and just can’t get over yourself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![andros](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e480ec/32.png) [@andros](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/andros)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/783 "2014-07-24T18:06:33Z")

</div>

> [@levdrakon](#):
>
> a self-righteous Heather

And that makes you…Veronica? Dumptruck? Oh, wait, you’re Betty Finn in this scenario, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/784 "2014-07-24T18:07:55Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> Assuming that I was responding to someone who had actually called me that, you might have something. As it is …

So, you just randomly start talking about things “generally” and not because anyone else said anything. You’re just “generally” pointing it out in the presence of people who just happen to fit the categorization.

And you call other people dishonest? In your face-to-face life, does anyone actually fall for this line of bullshit you peddle? It’s hilariously transparent in writing, but maybe you couple it with a super earnest look or something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/785 "2014-07-24T18:09:53Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> The fact that many experts who are familiar with the evidence and supposed to base their opinions on an assessment of the evidence felt there was likely some genetic component tends to weaken your assertion that there is “no evidence” of any genetic component.

Considering the variety of ways that the polling question could be interpreted, and the low response level, I don’t think it weakens my case significantly at all.

> [@](#):
>
> You parried this by suggesting (post #734) that they were basing their contrary positions on “_suspicions, feelings, etc. about the subject_”.

This is also just my “suspicions, feelings, etc.”. I really don’t have any idea beyond the vaguest notion what those scientists believe, much less why they believe it.

> [@](#):
>
> This amounts to a claim about the opinions of these scientists (and contrary to your assertion in post #771 that you have made no such claims) and it’s at that point that their motivation for holding those positions became relevant.

I still don’t see how it’s relevant. As to my motivations, I suppose it was something like “well, I might as well make a guess about some aspect of these vague poll answers”.

> [@](#):
>
> In that case it would behoove you to ascertain that your various opponents in these discussions are actually saying what you presume them to be saying - that genetic factors account for the entire disparity - before carrying on as you do.

I have ascertained that, at least for **CP** (entire or almost entire).

> [@](#):
>
> Personally I think it’s ludicrous to think that genetic factors account for the entire discrepancy between the general populations of whites versus blacks, and I doubt if anyone is actually making this claim. (It might be that someone is making that claim about certain tests which measured specific supposedly normalized cohorts.)

**CP** has pretty clearly made this claim (or almost this claim).

> [@](#):
>
> [IIRC, people have pointed this issue - specifically that the presence of environmental factors doesn’t mean that there are not also genetic factors - to you in the past, but I can’t be bothered to hunt this down just now, and I could be wrong.]

People probably have, and I haven’t disputed this. I recognize that there is a non-zero possibility that genetics are involved.

> [@](#):
>
> OK. But you would agree then, that for purposes of your argument with that hypothetical guy holding that hypothetical position, the third and fourth sentences of your post #734 - and all this discussion of the “best explanation” generally - are moot. Correct?

Possibly, but who cares? I wasn’t arguing with some hypothetical guy in that post – I was arguing against real assertions that the best explanation for the test score disparity is inferior genes for intelligence among black people. Indeed, unless I am wildly mistaken, **CP** argues that this is the _only_ significant factor in the test score disparity nowadays.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/786 "2014-07-24T18:11:35Z")

</div>

I’m still curious why my motivations are “interesting”, but the motivations of those who claim that black people have inferior genes for intelligence, on average, are not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![levdrakon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@levdrakon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/levdrakon)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/787 "2014-07-24T18:17:26Z")

</div>

> [@andros](#):
>
> And that makes you…Veronica? Dumptruck? Oh, wait, you’re Betty Finn in this scenario, right?

I don’t who any of those people are. Are they from the movie?

Generally I’m a kind-hearted liberal tree hugger but in the pit I see people forming snotty little cliques and spewing out all sorts of nonsense and if I’m in the mood, I call them out for their crap. Then I get a troll-stalker following me around taking digs. Oh, well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/788 "2014-07-24T18:20:50Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> I’m still curious why my motivations are “interesting”, but the motivations of those who claim that black people have inferior genes for intelligence, on average, are not.

Or why it’s just so _interesting_ that you talk about this so often, but when people do nothing but talk about the inferiority of black people, that’s not remarkable at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/789 "2014-07-24T18:31:40Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> So, you just randomly start talking about things “generally” and not because anyone else said anything. You’re just “generally” pointing it out in the presence of people who just happen to fit the categorization.

You’re conflating two different posts. One is my first post to this thread (which you quoted above and called a complaint) - that was before anyone had called me anything and obviously did not amount to a complaint about being called anything. The other is my “generally” comment, which was clarifying my response to something you said.

Try to keep things straight, if possible.

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> I have ascertained that, at least for **CP** (entire or almost entire).
> 
> **CP** has pretty clearly made this claim (or almost this claim).

Can you link to that? I would be surprised. That would amount to a claim that there are no enviromental differences in aggregate between whites and blacks which might influence their average scores at all, which I can’t imagine anyone thinks. (As above, he might be claiming that certain sub-groups are or can be normalized to isolate these factors - e.g. I know he’s made claims about middle class blacks versus lower class whites - but in terms of the entire white and black populations I don’t recall anything of the sort. So a link would be helpful)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/790 "2014-07-24T18:36:45Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> You’re conflating two different posts. One is my first post to this thread (which you quoted above and called a complaint) - that was before anyone had called me anything and obviously did not amount to a complaint about being called anything.

It obviously WAS a complaint about being called a racist. To quote you again:

> [@](#):
>
> What I do object to is being defined as racist based on these qualifications and then having the term used with the connotation of being some sort of KKK member or the like.

You “object to” it. How is this not a complaint?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![andros](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e480ec/32.png) [@andros](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/andros)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/791 "2014-07-24T18:36:56Z")

</div>

> [@levdrakon](#):
>
> I don’t who any of those people are. Are they from the movie?

You don’t…you…but…

I weep. I weep for you. And I weep for the future of all humanity.

Go. Watch. Revel in the glory. I’ll wait.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/792 "2014-07-24T18:37:53Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> That would amount to a claim that there are no enviromental differences in aggregate between whites and blacks which might influence their average scores at all, which I can’t imagine anyone thinks.

That’s not what I said. He thinks the “nurture” factors have been entirely eliminated/accounted for, and the gap that still exists is entirely due to genes (basically, once the studies account for socio-economic status, he claims that any remaining gap is due to genes). I think that’s a ridiculous claim – mainly because I think it’s ludicrous to claim that all non-genetic factors (i.e. “nurture”) have been accounted for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/793 "2014-07-24T18:39:20Z")

</div>

The term “racist” is often misused as a name-calling way of shouting down opposing views rather than address the issue. Let’s deal with the facts instead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/794 "2014-07-24T18:40:42Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> The term “racist” is often misused as a name-calling way of shouting down opposing views rather than address the issue.

Perhaps, but I don’t think it’s being misused here. It really is a racist claim, and perhaps racism in its purest form, to claim that black people are inherently less intelligent, on average, due to genes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/795 "2014-07-24T18:46:03Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> It really is a racist claim, and perhaps racism in its purest form, to claim that black people are inherently less intelligent, on average, due to genes.

Until the scientific evidence emerges - which may be never - we can’t say with certainly whether black people have a lower average IQ due to genetics or not.

So the fair approach is: “This theory cannot be confirmed as true, but cannot be discounted either. It could be accurate or inaccurate.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/796 "2014-07-24T18:49:08Z")

</div>

I sense a rush by some people to hurriedly and adamantly insist, though, that black people can’t possibly have a lower average IQ due to genetics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/797 "2014-07-24T18:49:28Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> Until the scientific evidence emerges - which may be never - we can’t say with certainly whether black people have a lower average IQ due to genetics or not.
> 
> So the fair approach is: “This theory cannot be confirmed as true, but cannot be discounted either. It could be accurate or inaccurate.”

By the same logic, we can’t say with certainty whether Jews are inherently greedier and less trustworthy than others due to genetics, so it’s not racist to say they are.

Sorry. Both are racist claims. It’s racist to say that Jews are inherently genetically less honest, and it’s racist to say that black people are inherently genetically less intelligent.

And we have no genetic evidence that supports either claim.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/798 "2014-07-24T18:52:29Z")

</div>

It’s also not a theory. It’s a hypothesis. The question is “why does this test-score disparity exist”? The hypothesis of some, like **Chief Pedant** , is that it exists (once corrected for economic factors) due to inferior genes for intelligence, on average, in black people.

But it’s just a hypothesis. It hasn’t been tested, except perhaps in the Scarr study (which I’ve cited), and the Scarr study’s findings seem to refute the hypothesis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/799 "2014-07-24T18:55:21Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> It’s also not a theory. It’s a hypothesis. The question is \*\*“why does this test-score disparity exist”? \*\*The hypothesis of some, like **Chief Pedant** , is that it exists (once corrected for economic factors) due to inferior genes for intelligence, on average, in black people.

I’m inclined to think the test-score disparity among different groups of people is more about culture, attitude and personal motivation than anything genetic or economic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519/800 "2014-07-24T18:55:59Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> I’m inclined to think the test-score disparity among different groups of people is more about culture, attitude and personal motivation than anything genetic or economic.

Okay.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519.md?page=39)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-a-racist-warning-signs/692519.md?page=41)
