# Are you going to watch the Victoria's Secret fashion show?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [November 20, 2002, 6:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779 "2002-11-20T18:57:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael\_Ellis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/977dab/32.png) [@Michael\_Ellis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Michael_Ellis)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2002, 5:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779/21 "2002-11-21T05:08:51Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by red\_dragon60 \*  
> \*\*I will see Heidi Klum tonight. I have seen her in real life and actually met her. So fine, so fine… \*\*

Cite? Details? _Oh come on, tell me please!_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DKW](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dkw/32/3118_2.png) [@DKW](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DKW)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2002, 6:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779/22 "2002-11-21T06:18:27Z")

</div>

I’m recording it right now. I won’t be watching for the sex appeal, of course. (Hey, I have a lifetime pass to a site where the women _remove_ their underwear; this penny-ante “titillation” crap stopped interesting me years ago.) It’ll be more curiosity than anything. In particular, I want to see Victoria’s Secret unique vision of what’s sexy. From what I’ve seen of the previews, it’s downright _surreal_ these days. (Somehow, when I picture an angel, the last thing that comes to my mind is “skinny woman in ill-fitting underwear walking listlessly back and forth”.)

I really don’t understand the beef these misguided women’s groups have. These are professional models who know exactly what they’re doing and are getting paid a pretty hefty amount for it. I mean, really, _what’s the problem?_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elfkin477](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/a9a28c/32.png) [@elfkin477](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elfkin477)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2002, 6:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779/23 "2002-11-21T06:52:05Z")

</div>

Nah, like 90% of the other straight, non-prostitute, women, I decided to skip it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amarinth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3be4f8/32.png) [@amarinth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/amarinth)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2002, 8:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779/24 "2002-11-21T08:19:14Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Jeep’s Phoenix \*  
> \*\*Our local CBS affiliate is choosing to air the show tomorrow at 2 PM because “the producers decided the content was inappropriate for that time slot [9 PM].” \*\*

Because children are more likely to be asleep at 2pm than at 9?

Yeah.

Anyway, anything that has been advertising itself as “beautiful women, very little clothing” is not entirely non-porn-like.  
It was opposite **The West Wing** didn’t watch.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Manduck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/manduck/32/256_2.png) [@Manduck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Manduck)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2002, 8:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779/25 "2002-11-21T08:38:14Z")

</div>

I skipped it too. The internet holds wonders that make the Victoria’s Secret fashion show look like a quilting bee.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sir\_Dirx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b77776/32.png) [@Sir\_Dirx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sir_Dirx)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2002, 12:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779/26 "2002-11-21T12:48:15Z")

</div>

Does anyone else here think it was done really poorly, compared to last year? The camera couldn’t keep a single angle for more than two seconds, the musical performances sucked and there was just generally too much hype and not enough showcasing of the actual products. I don’t see how this could have been very successful from either a consumer’s or oggler’s point of view.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmkeller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmkeller/32/118_2.png) [@cmkeller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmkeller)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2002, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779/27 "2002-11-21T18:49:19Z")

</div>

amarinth:

> [@](#):
>
> Because children are more likely to be asleep at 2pm than at 9?

They’d be in school.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-going-to-watch-the-victorias-secret-fashion-show/137779.md?page=1)
