# Are you Team Trayvon or Team Zimmerman?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [March 26, 2012, 9:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881 "2012-03-26T21:27:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carmady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f04885/32.png) [@Carmady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Carmady)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 8:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/201 "2012-03-27T20:50:00Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Zimmerman’s story (as far as I can tell, and it isn’t very far) is that Zimmerman went up to Martin and asked him what his business was.

From what I’ve read, Zimmerman told police he got out of the truck to look at a street sign and was attacked from behind.

If that was his story at the time, the location of the body (in the backyard or between houses?) could make it implausible, as well as the girlfriend’s statement that Martin asked Zimmerman why he was following him, and possible 911 call evidence that Zimmerman had gotten out to follow Martin rather than to check a sign.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nars\_Glinley](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nars_glinley/32/8177_2.png) [@Nars\_Glinley](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nars_Glinley)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/202 "2012-03-27T20:55:40Z")

</div>

Unless he was captain of the neighborhood followers, Zimmerman should have stayed in his truck and watched.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/203 "2012-03-27T20:57:24Z")

</div>

> [@Carmady](#):
>
> From what I’ve read, Zimmerman told police he got out of the truck to look at a street sign and was attacked from behind.

Seriously, is it so hard to look things up?

> **[George Zimmerman: Trayvon Martin was the aggressor](https://www.nj.com/news/2012/03/george_zimmerman_trayvon_marti.html)**
>
> George Zimmerman who shot and killed Trayvon Martin, says the two exchanged words before the teen punched him in the nose and began banging his head on the ground

The Orlando Sentinel reported that George Zimmerman told police he lost 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in the neighborhood he regularly patrolled and was walking back to his vehicle last month when the youth approached him from behind.

=========================

Where are you getting this “he got out of the truck to look at a street sign and was attacked from behind” crap from? I have seen this repeated a few times already.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carmady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f04885/32.png) [@Carmady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Carmady)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 9:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/204 "2012-03-27T21:12:26Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> Seriously, is it so hard to look things up?

I did look it up. The first result that appeared was [this one](http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/03/19/US-to-investigate-killing-of-Fla-teen/UPI-85941332170292/).

“Police said Zimmerman told them he got out of his vehicle to get a look at a street sign, and Martin attacked him from behind”  
Of course, this article may be wrong.

Also, unless I missed it somehow your article does not appear to say what Zimmerman gave as his reason for getting out of the truck?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 9:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/205 "2012-03-27T21:15:48Z")

</div>

> [@Carmady](#):
>
> Also, unless I missed it somehow your article does not appear to say what Zimmerman gave as his reason for getting out of the truck?

AFAIK it’s in the 911 calls. There is no indication exactly why - he probably got out to follow Martin. But it wasn’t “to look at the street sign”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carmady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f04885/32.png) [@Carmady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Carmady)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 9:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/206 "2012-03-27T21:22:17Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> AFAIK it’s in the 911 calls. There is no indication exactly why - he probably got out to follow Martin. But it wasn’t “to look at the street sign”.

No, it almost certainly wasn’t. Which is why IF he gave that reason, it would destroy his credibility.

It also seems odd that he would get out of his vehicle to follow Martin if he had lost him already. And it is odd if the body was found in a back yard or between houses. And it is odd if Martin asked him why he was following him, and Zimmerman promptly turned his back and ignored him after following him intently for so long.

Would you follow someone you suspect to be a messed up criminal, following them through a back yard, and then all of a sudden turn around leaving yourself vulnerable when they asked you why you were following them?

It’s just an odd story any way you look at it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/207 "2012-03-27T21:26:33Z")

</div>

> [@Carmady](#):
>
> No, it almost certainly wasn’t. Which is why IF he gave that reason, it would destroy his credibility.

He did not.

> [@](#):
>
> It also seems odd that he would get out of his vehicle to follow Martin if he had lost him already. And it is odd if the body was found in a back yard or between houses. And it is odd if Martin asked him why he was following him, and Zimmerman promptly turned his back and ignored him after following him intently for so long.

Huh? The girlfriend reports (if you believe her) that the conversation was: Martin: “Why are you following me?”. Zimmerman: “What are you doing here?”. Then the sounds of the scuffle. So Martin’s question could have been while Zimmerman was turned away. When Zimmerman answered, he’d definitely turn to Martin.

> [@](#):
>
> Would you follow someone you suspect to be a messed up criminal, following them through a back yard, and then all of a sudden turn around leaving yourself vulnerable when they asked you why you were following them?

You’re making things up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![you\_with\_the\_face](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/ecccb3/32.png) [@you\_with\_the\_face](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/you_with_the_face)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 9:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/208 "2012-03-27T21:29:17Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> I don’t know what happened. Zimmerman’s story (as far as I can tell, and it isn’t very far) is that Zimmerman went up to Martin and asked him what his business was.

That’s not the official story. According to the press, Zimmerman claimed that Martin ambushed him, demanded to know if he had a problem, and then–when Zimmerman said no and supposedly reached for his cellphone–Martin proclaimed “Well you do now” and then decked him in the nose and proceeded to batter his head against the sidewalk.

Notice how Zimmerman took care to mention that he reached for his cellphone. Whoever said that everything in his story is oh-so convenient is dead on. Zimmerman wasn’t chasing anyone. No sir! It was Martin who came after _him_. And he didn’t pull out his _gun_ in an attempt to intimidate the kid. Why gosh, that’s crazy talk! It was his _phone_ that he reached for, you see? Cuz of course if you thought a drugged out weirdo was about to start some mess with you, bursting up out of alcoves and stuff in the darkness like an angry pterodactyl, pulling out the gun on your hip would be the last thing on your mind. You’d go for your phone first, duh. And you’d make sure to tell the cops this, too. And also, Zimmerman didn’t lay a finger on the kid or do anything that could be legally construed as assault. In fact, it was _Trayvon_ who assaulted _him_. And he didn’t just hit him. But _battered_ him. Holy mother of God the man was battered. Of course we can only take his word for that since there seems to be a shortage of medical evidence attesting to this. But OMG, battered.

Everything in this statement smells funky. I don’t know why anyone would give any weight to Zimmerman’s portrayal of events. He sounded like a paranoid lunatic on the 911 call and his statement sounds the same way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carmady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f04885/32.png) [@Carmady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Carmady)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/209 "2012-03-27T21:34:27Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> He did not.

Cite?

I don’t know where the article got that idea from, and I don’t know if it is true, but you haven’t said where you have your information from either.

> [@Terr](#):
>
> Huh? The girlfriend reports (if you believe her) that the conversation was: Martin: “Why are you following me?”. Zimmerman: “What are you doing here?”. Then the sounds of the scuffle. So Martin’s question could have been while Zimmerman was turned away. When Zimmerman answered, he’d definitely turn to Martin.

But you just said Zimmerman claimed to be attacked from behind. Why would he ask a suspected messed up criminal “what are you doing here?” and then immediately turn his back on him?

> [@Terr](#):
>
> You’re making things up.

You just now claimed to know for sure what Zimmerman’s story was, despite having no cite to back you up.

I never claimed to know, and did provide an article to explain why I gave any credence at all to one possibility.

Who is making something up?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 9:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/210 "2012-03-27T21:37:39Z")

</div>

> [@Carmady](#):
>
> But you just said Zimmerman claimed to be attacked from behind. Why would he ask a suspected messed up criminal “what are you doing here?” and then immediately turn his back on him?

“when the youth approached him from behind”. Reading is hard, isn’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carmady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f04885/32.png) [@Carmady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Carmady)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/211 "2012-03-27T21:45:15Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> “when the youth approached him from behind”. Reading is hard, isn’t it?

Yes, I did misread that line.

Did you find the cite to explain your certainty about Zimmerman’s story?

As far as I know there isn’t a really good explanation for why he got out of his vehicle. If he lost Martin why get out? Why walk between houses and through back yards (if that is indeed what happened)? Were they playing hide and seek?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 10:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/212 "2012-03-27T22:15:15Z")

</div>

> [@Carmady](#):
>
> Did you find the cite to explain your certainty about Zimmerman’s story?

I can dig around. Or you can go through the 911 tapes. It’s there.

> [@](#):
>
> As far as I know there isn’t a really good explanation for why he got out of his vehicle. If he lost Martin why get out?

Why not? Apparently he was following him. Apparently, again, he thought he was up to something no good in his neighborhood. That’s not a crime and is not in any way illegal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Harborwolf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c89c15/32.png) [@Harborwolf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harborwolf)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 10:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/213 "2012-03-27T22:43:11Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> Why not? Apparently he was following him. Apparently, again, he thought he was up to something no good in his neighborhood. That’s not a crime and is not in any way illegal.

Though it’s possible that Trayvon was walking through the neighborhood and felt threatened because some unknown person was following him through his neighborhood and assumed that Zimmerman was up to no good.

Neither assumption is more logical than the other. Both saw someone suspicious acting in a potentially nefarious manner. The only problem is that one had a gun, and that the law makes it more difficult to do a proper investigation. There seems to be an assumption of complete innocence on the part of the shooter and a presumption of guilt on the part of the victim. I’m well aware that innocent until proven guilty is a rather important part of our justice system, but it seems this law wants to make proving someone guilty unnecessarily difficult. As was said by Bricker, whereas self defense would be a trial defense normally, it’s seems to prevent a trial at all in Florida.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carmady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f04885/32.png) [@Carmady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Carmady)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/214 "2012-03-27T22:45:31Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> I can dig around. Or you can go through the 911 tapes. It’s there.

No, it’s not there. The question is about what Zimmerman told the police afterward.

It is possible that he got out of his vehicle to chase Martin, but then lied about it later, saying he was checking a sign. IF he lied about that it would hurt his credibility about everything else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![colonial](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/34f0e0/32.png) [@colonial](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/colonial)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/215 "2012-03-27T23:11:30Z")

</div>

Florida legislators who sponsored the state’s stand your ground law  
have said that the law does _not_ apply in this case:

**(link):**  
[Fla. ‘Stand Ground’ lawmakers call for arrest](http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-03-21/news/31222228_1_castle-doctrine-peaden-deadly-force)

**(from link):**

> [@](#):
>
> …Former state Sen. Durell Peaden and current state Rep. Dennis Baxley said the law they wrote in 2005, which allows someone who feels threatened to “meet force with force” without backing down first, was being misapplied in the shooting death of the 17-year-old, the Miami Herald reported.
> 
> “They got the goods on him. They need to prosecute whoever shot the kid,” Peaden, a Republican, told the Herald. “He has no protection under my law.”
> 
> …Peaden and Baxley said that 911 tapes showing that Zimmerman followed Martin despite a dispatcher’s request to stay away appeared to show that the 28-year-old crime watch volunteer was the aggressor.
> 
> “The guy lost his defense right then,” Peaden told the Herald. “When he said, ‘I’m following him,’ he lost his defense.”
> 
> The pair noted, hwoever, that they didn’t know all the facts of the case and their opinions could change if new details were uncovered.

In other developments I have just signed this online petition; I hope everyone  
who is on Trayvon’s team signs it:

**(link):**  
[Prosecute Zimmerman](http://www.change.org/petitions/prosecute-the-killer-of-our-son-17-year-old-trayvon-martin#)

**(petition text):**

> [@](#):
>
> Prosecute the killer of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I’m writing you today to call for justice for Trayvon Martin and his family.
> 
> Trayvon Martin was only 17 years old when he was gunned down by the Neighborhood Watch captain George Zimmerman. All Trayvon did was go to the store to get his brother some Skittles.
> 
> According to police, George Zimmerman admitted to the shooting and killing of Trayvon Martin. Why has he not been charged and his case been handed over to prosecutors?
> 
> Trayvon Martin was unarmed when he was shot by Zimmerman. All he had in his hands was some candy when he was followed and approached by Zimmerman - who ignored instructions from police not to confront the young man.
> 
> Please uphold justice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/216 "2012-03-27T23:12:57Z")

</div>

> [@Harborwolf](#):
>
> Though it’s possible that Trayvon was walking through the neighborhood and felt threatened because some unknown person was following him through his neighborhood and assumed that Zimmerman was up to no good.

It is possible as well.

> [@](#):
>
> Neither assumption is more logical than the other. Both saw someone suspicious acting in a potentially nefarious manner. The only problem is that one had a gun, and that the law makes it more difficult to do a proper investigation. There seems to be an assumption of complete innocence on the part of the shooter and a presumption of guilt on the part of the victim.

Both could have been acting in self-defense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/217 "2012-03-27T23:13:42Z")

</div>

This thread has so many long posts. It would be a lot easier on me if the admins would change everybody’s title to either “Team Trayvon” or “Team Zimmerman” for this thread only.

Admins?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aldiboronti](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9fc348/32.png) [@aldiboronti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aldiboronti)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/218 "2012-03-27T23:13:55Z")

</div>

> [@you\_with\_the\_face](#):
>
> I don’t know why anyone would give any weight to Zimmerman’s portrayal of events.

Perhaps because [it’s been corroborated by witnesses?](http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/trayvon-martin-shooting-details-emerge-facebook-twitter-accounts-180103647.html)

> [@](#):
>
> “That is the account Zimmerman gave police,” the paper said, “and much of it has been corroborated by witnesses, authorities say.”

BTW I have no Team. I just don’t like the sights and sounds of a mob rushing to judgment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/219 "2012-03-27T23:13:59Z")

</div>

> [@colonial](#):
>
> Florida legislators who sponsored the state’s stand your ground law  
> have said that the law does _not_ apply in this case:

They don’t get to decide whether it applies or doesn’t apply in this case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Tao\_s\_Revenge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/73ab20/32.png) [@The\_Tao\_s\_Revenge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Tao_s_Revenge)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 11:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881/220 "2012-03-27T23:23:07Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> “Supposed” according to who? The law? Not as far as I can tell.  
> I’m sure it can. But as far as I can tell, it does not constitute, or justify, assault and battery.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

So let me get this straight. I can stalk you through the night scarring the crap out of you (per the girlfriend’s testimony), ignoring your questions about why I’m acting like a creeper, and you can’t defend yourself from that perceived threat.  
What’s your address? I’d like to have some fun.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-you-team-trayvon-or-team-zimmerman/616881.md?page=12)
