No you’re right, I cannot. But I do particularly love this…
At least my mum fucked live goats, unlike yours who got ass-fucked ans bukkaked by dead one.
Moreso, my mum’s whoring put brea on our tables, your mum couldn’t even get used toilet paper.
…pretty fucking hateful response to someone who was glad a gay ban was lifted. Alas, you sure aren’t saying that God hates fags (even though you seem to be pretty clear).
This argument really is so much classier:
Since, apparently, most people answering the thread don’t actually hold the view or have seriously talked with someone who does hold, I’ll answer.
My own religious (Catholic) view about marriage is more important to me than the argument I’m going to make, but I can make a religion-free delusion-free argument.
The whole point of creating the legal/social reality of marriage in almost every society in all of th ehistory of humanity (save for the last 50 years or so) has been prtoecting/distributing/assigning assets and protecting children. Children were essential to the concept of marriage. Marriages that could not forseeably have children (age, disease) were modelled from the child-bearing reality and were exceptional rather than the norm.
The fact the there is gigantic ammount of legal precendets and laws and regulation concening marriage make no sense if “non-child-bearingness” becomes an essential part of marriages.
SSM means that marriage is now completely away from “you’re gonna make some kids so we’re gonna give you special rules”. SSM means that there is no logic for joint filing of taxes, or common isnsurance or medical visits AS SPECIAL RULES for married people make no sense. Just get a clear person-to-person contract about assests and get done with it (both for same sex and different sex couples).
Of course, the state should alway protect the right of children.
The meaningless part is, of course, for the civil wedding and more rethocal than true.
Gay couples can’t conceive children without outside help, so fuck you, you can’t get married. Very classy argument indeed.