# Arguments against SSM not in any way based on faith or tradition?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arguments-against-ssm-not-in-any-way-based-on-faith-or-tradition/662488>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [July 2, 2013, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arguments-against-ssm-not-in-any-way-based-on-faith-or-tradition/662488 "2013-07-02T22:29:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2013, 9:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arguments-against-ssm-not-in-any-way-based-on-faith-or-tradition/662488/101 "2013-07-05T09:21:42Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> [shrug] Well, allowing SSM won’t make women any poorer, and will make some lesbian couples slightly more materially comfortable.

In fact, allowing SSM will have a huge financial benefit (or rather prevent a huge financial disbenefit) for many same-sex couples and their children.

I strongly encourage you to read this article by the Avatar of Gayness himself Dan Savage: [I Can Die Now](http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/i-can-die-now/Content?oid=17152673)

> [@](#):
>
> Because we weren’t married in the eyes of the federal government—because of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act—Terry, who has been a stay-at-home parent for more than a dozen years, wouldn’t be able to collect Social Security survivor benefits, something he would be entitled to if we were an opposite-sex married couple. He would also face a crushing federal tax burden, taxes he wouldn’t have to pay if Terry were my wife.
> 
> We talked to a tax lawyer about it once. She had two words of advice for me: “Don’t die.”
> 
> For 15 years, this weighed on me. If I died, my husband would be made to suffer. If I died, my son would be made to suffer. Parents are supposed to protect their children from harm, and here was this thing—DOMA—that I couldn’t protect him from. If something happened to me, DOMA would impoverish my husband and son. Terry and D.J. would lose the house. They would lose everything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Learjeff](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/94ad74/32.png) [@Learjeff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Learjeff)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 9:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arguments-against-ssm-not-in-any-way-based-on-faith-or-tradition/662488/102 "2013-07-08T21:49:48Z")

</div>

> [@puddleglum](#):
>
> Think of Marcus Aurelius " This thing, what is it in itself, in its own constitution? What is its substance and material? And what its causal nature [or form]? And what is it doing in the world? And how long does it subsist?"

Think of Sartre, “Existence preceeds essence.”

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> What’s that, poverty that won’t ask for directions?

snicker 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/46a35a/32.png) [@Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tim_T-Bonham.net)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2013, 4:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arguments-against-ssm-not-in-any-way-based-on-faith-or-tradition/662488/103 "2013-07-09T04:24:08Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> 😕 I thought all sexually transmitted diseases were tested for.

No, only some diseases.  
And only in some states. (I even think there are some states that don’t test for any diseases.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2013, 4:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arguments-against-ssm-not-in-any-way-based-on-faith-or-tradition/662488/104 "2013-07-09T04:52:33Z")

</div>

> [@t-bonham@scc.net](#):
>
> No, only some diseases.  
> And only in some states. (I even think there are some states that don’t test for any diseases.)

NY v. Md. See [_Guys and Dolls_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guys_And_Dolls).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Feldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lord_feldon/32/341_2.png) [@Lord\_Feldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Feldon)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2013, 6:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arguments-against-ssm-not-in-any-way-based-on-faith-or-tradition/662488/105 "2013-07-09T06:17:42Z")

</div>

> [@t-bonham@scc.net](#):
>
> I even think there are some states that don’t test for any diseases.

Nearly all states have gotten rid of their blood test requirements.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arguments-against-ssm-not-in-any-way-based-on-faith-or-tradition/662488.md?page=5)
