# Arithmetic of WaMu seizure & sale

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arithmetic-of-wamu-seizure-sale/465423>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [September 27, 2008, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arithmetic-of-wamu-seizure-sale/465423 "2008-09-27T00:56:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CookingWithGas](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cookingwithgas/32/485_2.png) [@CookingWithGas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CookingWithGas)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2008, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arithmetic-of-wamu-seizure-sale/465423/1 "2008-09-27T00:56:39Z")

</div>

From an article quoted in another thread:

> [@](#):
>
> Under the deal, JPMorgan Chase will acquire all the banking operations of WaMu, including $307 billion in assets and $188 billion in deposits.
> 
> In exchange for scooping up WaMu, JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) will pay approximately $1.9 billion to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
> 
> …
> 
> The FDIC, however, was quick to point out Thursday evening that the WaMu-JPMorgan Chase deal would not have any impact to its insurance fund which covers customer deposits when banks fail.
> 
> “WaMu’s balance sheet and the payment paid by JPMorgan Chase allowed a transaction in which neither the uninsured depositors nor the insurance fund absorbed any losses,” Bair said.

OK, deposits are liabilities on the bank’s balance sheet. I don’t know what the assets are, probably some combination of buildings, investments, and receivables on loans that are still good (they plan to write off about $31 billion of subprime loans). So the net is roughly $200 billion.

If FDIC didn’t have to pay any claims, and JPMC is getting a bottom line of $200 billion, why did they pay only 1% of that amount? This is like the bellhop and the missing dollar. (The stockholders lost everything, but they are not part of this equation. I don’t know what happens to the $1.9 extra large that the FDIC gets.)

I hope I am asking a simple accounting question but I suspect this gets complicated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OldGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OldGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OldGuy)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2008, 8:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arithmetic-of-wamu-seizure-sale/465423/2 "2008-09-27T20:17:26Z")

</div>

> [@CookingWithGas](#):
>
> From an article quoted in another thread:
> 
> OK, deposits are liabilities on the bank’s balance sheet. I don’t know what the assets are, probably some combination of buildings, investments, and receivables on loans that are still good (they plan to write off about $31 billion of subprime loans). So the net is roughly $200 billion.
> 
> If FDIC didn’t have to pay any claims, and JPMC is getting a bottom line of $200 billion, why did they pay only 1% of that amount? This is like the bellhop and the missing dollar. (The stockholders lost everything, but they are not part of this equation. I don’t know what happens to the $1.9 extra large that the FDIC gets.)
> 
> I hope I am asking a simple accounting question but I suspect this gets complicated.

I don’t know without more information, but I suspect for one thing that in addition to writing off $31 billion, many of the other loans are not worth their face value which is probably the stated value of the assets in the description.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SmackFu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/53a042/32.png) [@SmackFu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SmackFu)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2008, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arithmetic-of-wamu-seizure-sale/465423/3 "2008-09-27T22:48:28Z")

</div>

If you look at the investor presentation on [this page](http://investor.shareholder.com/jpmorganchase/presentations.cfm), page 17 has the math. It’s formatted more nicely there, but here’s the numbers:

> [@](#):
>
> Tangible assets assumed $296  
> Liabilities assumed 265  
> Net assets $31  
> Loan marks (31)  
> Reversal of loan loss reserve 8  
> Other PAA (6)  
> Adjusted net asset value $2  
> Consideration (2)  
> Pro forma capital impact $0

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CookingWithGas](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cookingwithgas/32/485_2.png) [@CookingWithGas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CookingWithGas)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2008, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/arithmetic-of-wamu-seizure-sale/465423/4 "2008-09-29T17:27:53Z")

</div>

> [@SmackFu](#):
>
> If you look at the investor presentation on [this page](http://investor.shareholder.com/jpmorganchase/presentations.cfm), page 17 has the math. It’s formatted more nicely there, but here’s the numbers:

The answer seems to be buried in there. The article I quoted said deposits of $188 billion but didn’t mention other liabilities. This presentation shows liabilities of $265 billion. The presentation also shows assets of $296B and the article shows $307B. That pretty much accounts for the discrepancy (I made a $100 billion error in my OP, good thing I’m not their accountant :o).

Thanks for finding the real numbers!!!
