# Artists who made gobs of money -- but didn't sell out.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [November 15, 2005, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223 "2005-11-15T21:34:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Interrobang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/interrobang/32/17463_2.png) [@Interrobang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Interrobang)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2005, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/1 "2005-11-15T21:34:21Z")

</div>

Last night at trivia, we were discussing _Peanuts_ and Charles Schulz, and how, even though Schulz became mind-bogglingly wealthy, you don’t often hear about him selling out.

You hear about _Peanuts_ sucking in its later years, of course – the later years apparently starting any time after 1970. But Schulz didn’t change the content of the strip based on all the merchandising he was doing. People ignored the strip’s bitter undertones (and overtones) on their own, with no help from Schulz. Charlie Brown never kicked the football, kissed the little red-haired girl, or outwitted Lucy.

The strip’s sensibility evolved, but it didn’t bend under the weight of all the bags of money it was bringing in.

I’m sure some people think Schulz sold out, however they want to use the term. Maybe I can even be convinced – I’m not a _Peanuts_ scholar.

But the discussion did prompt a big question: which artists – whatever the medium – became rich and famous without deliberately altering their sensitivity to attract the masses?

Another candidate that occurred to me this morning: Hitchcock. Before Spielberg, probably the most famous movie director in America, and yes his later works got sludgy, but his strong, cockeyed sensibility remained with him to the end.

Any other candidates for non-sellout artistic wealth machines?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Annie-Xmas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@Annie-Xmas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie-Xmas)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2005, 9:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/2 "2005-11-15T21:36:34Z")

</div>

At columist Erma Bombeck’s funeral, her agent Aaron Priest said she was “the one person you could not buy. If Erma did not want to do something, no amount of money could make her do it. I once told a person ‘You could fill a room with gold bars and it wouldn’t make a difference.’”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2005, 9:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/3 "2005-11-15T21:42:10Z")

</div>

You can debate whether or not he altered his work, but Charles Schulz undeniably agreed to all kinds of merchandizing deals for his characters.

Bill Watterson, of _Calvin and Hobbes_ fame, was on the opposite end of the spectrum - he basically refused virutally all merchandizing opportunities he was offered. The only things he ever authorized other than the comic strip itself and the books were two calendars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hampshire](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hampshire/32/4887_2.png) [@Hampshire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hampshire)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2005, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/4 "2005-11-15T21:47:22Z")

</div>

> [@Little Nemo](#):
>
> Bill Watterson, of _Calvin and Hobbes_ fame, was on the opposite end of the spectrum - he basically refused virutally all merchandizing opportunities he was offered. The only things he ever authorized other than the comic strip itself and the books were two calendars.

What??!! You mean he never authorized those Calvin piss on Ford/Chevy decals that emblazon every rednecks pick-up north of the equator?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Interrobang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/interrobang/32/17463_2.png) [@Interrobang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Interrobang)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2005, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/5 "2005-11-15T21:50:11Z")

</div>

> [@Little Nemo](#):
>
> You can debate whether or not he altered his work, but Charles Schulz undeniably agreed to all kinds of merchandizing deals for his characters.

Yes. But that’s not really the same thing as selling out – at least, not as I understand the term. Schulz is no Jim Davis, and _Peanuts_ was never the deliberately crafted merchandising machine that _Garfield_ quickly became. Snoopy’s spokesgig for MetLife didn’t change the direction of Schulz’s strip.

Watterson is a good counterexample, but I’m more interested in people who were able to sell stuff without selling out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quint](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/76d3ee/32.png) [@Quint](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quint)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2005, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/6 "2005-11-15T22:30:10Z")

</div>

Perhaps the only musical group with integrity- ABBA. While it’s hard to understand how a group with no social or political context to begin with could “sell out”, they turned down $1 Billion to do a reunion tour, choosing to leave their musical legacy intact.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![priapus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ed655f/32.png) [@priapus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/priapus)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2005, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/7 "2005-11-15T23:29:34Z")

</div>

Bill Hicks,the most famous comedian no one knows

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dalej42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@dalej42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dalej42)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2005, 11:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/8 "2005-11-15T23:32:48Z")

</div>

How about the Beatles? Honestly, didn’t they do what they wanted, when they wanted? If it worked, great. If not, oh well.

Hmm, one might say the Anthology “new” songs were a sell out. Still, the whole, “John left this song…see what you want to do with it…” was established during the latter part of their career.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tarrsk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/97f17d/32.png) [@Tarrsk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tarrsk)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2005, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/9 "2005-11-15T23:50:15Z")

</div>

Radiohead have made a career of doing exactly the opposite of what their corporate handlers recommend, which hasn’t stopped them from being one of the most popular acts on the planet.

I agree with **Little Nemo** about Watterson. And he sold stuff like crazy, only it was books and compilations of strips rather than tie-in products.

Gary Larson also retired at the peak of his popularity, and _The Far Side_ was as brilliant in its last days as it ever was. No sellout there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RealityChuck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/realitychuck/32/195_2.png) [@RealityChuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RealityChuck)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 12:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/10 "2005-11-16T00:28:31Z")

</div>

\*_Charlie Chaplin. \*\* He was the most famous and most merchandized person on the planet (and a very tough negotiator who always got the best terms for whatever he did_), but he still made his movies the way he wanted to.

**Alfred Hitchcock** became a trademark and an ad for his films, but he made films his way (especially once he became established as a brand name director).

\*Chaplin knew the key to negotiating: be ready to walk. He’d ask what he wanted and if he didn’t get it, he’d walk away.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marque\_elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@marque\_elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/marque_elf)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 12:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/11 "2005-11-16T00:46:34Z")

</div>

Submitted for your approval, a young man from Hibbing, MN. Bob Dylan has certainly gone through a lot of changes during his career but I don’t think he ever sold out. His MTV unplugged is a wretched album but I don’t consider it a sellout.

I don’t see Bruce Springsteen as a sellout either. In fact, when the Republicans offered him a whole lotta money so that they could use _Born In The USA_ in the campaign to re-elect Reagen, he publicly turned them down. His reunion with the E Street band doesn’t come across as a “we need money, so lets tour” operation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d26b3c/32.png) [@Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Blue_Sky)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 12:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/12 "2005-11-16T00:51:16Z")

</div>

Prince?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ouryL](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ouryl/32/6067_2.png) [@ouryL](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ouryL)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 1:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/13 "2005-11-16T01:04:06Z")

</div>

> [@Little Nemo](#):
>
> You can debate whether or not he altered his work, but Charles Schulz undeniably agreed to all kinds of merchandizing deals for his characters.
> 
> Bill Watterson, of _Calvin and Hobbes_ fame, was on the opposite end of the spectrum - he basically refused virutally all merchandizing opportunities he was offered. The only things he ever authorized other than the comic strip itself and the books were two calendars.

He was lucky. The "[Happiness is a warm puppy](http://www.burnsland.com/words/images/HappinessPuppy.jpg) " became an icon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 1:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/14 "2005-11-16T01:55:17Z")

</div>

> [@Little Nemo](#):
>
> You can debate whether or not he altered his work, but Charles Schulz undeniably agreed to all kinds of merchandizing deals for his characters.

Also discussed during trivia night was the question of whether or not the undoubtedly large checks Schulz received for the TV cartoons (culminating in “Race For Your Life, Charlie Brown”) qualifies as “selling out.”

We weren’t sure. Hence, the thread. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 2:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/15 "2005-11-16T02:49:55Z")

</div>

Ditto on Prince. Always ready to experiment, always ready to fail. Some of his stuff sucks, but he’s never coasted, which is what I equate with selling out.

Kate Bush. She mellowed, but that’s exactly because she DOESN’T coast: her stuff stays emotionally true, as she has matured and mellowed.

David Bowie. Like Prince, Bowie is uneven but always ready to try something new. No coasting there.

Bjork.

Greta Garbo.

George Clooney.

And hearty agreements from me on Hitchcock, Radiohead, Chaplin, and Watterson.

As far ash Schulz, if you equate selling out with coasting, as I do for the purposes of this thread, Schulz was a major sellout. He shoulda retired 20, 30 years before he died, instead of continuing to crank out shallower and lamer dreck. Early Peanuts was revolutionary and brilliant; later Peanuts was lamer than Marmaduke.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangosteen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Mangosteen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangosteen)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 3:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/16 "2005-11-16T03:18:49Z")

</div>

I hear Dylan singing on TV commercials. Is that selling out or just selling?

I heard Robert Plant was against the Led Zeppelin Cadillac commercials, but Jimmy Page and John Paul Jones out voted him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Interrobang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/interrobang/32/17463_2.png) [@Interrobang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Interrobang)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 3:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/17 "2005-11-16T03:19:09Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> As far ash Schulz, if you equate selling out with coasting, as I do for the purposes of this thread, Schulz was a major sellout. He shoulda retired 20, 30 years before he died, instead of continuing to crank out shallower and lamer dreck.

So far as I’m concerned, selling out isn’t the same thing as sucking in one’s own unique and uncorrupted way.

I also don’t think earning a lot of money is the same thing as selling out, so the suggestions of Prince, Bowie, Clooney (good one!), etc. are all good.

Selling out, to my mind, is taking the money and altering your work so as to attract more money. Schulz’s TV specials don’t make him a sell out, in my mind, because what he was really interested in was the comic strip. Yeah, he ran out of gas long before he stopped driving, but no one paid him to go to Vegas instead of Kalamazoo.

What I’m really interested in – so people like Watterson are borderline, and Bill Hicks doesn’t qualify at all – are people who took the money but didn’t let it corrupt them. (Change them, maybe. Corrupt them, no.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d26b3c/32.png) [@Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Blue_Sky)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 3:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/18 "2005-11-16T03:25:47Z")

</div>

> [@Mangosteen](#):
>
> I hear Dylan singing on TV commercials. Is that selling out or just selling?

That was just one song, I believe. Suppsoedly, though, Dylan once joked (in the 60s) that if he were to use his music to sell anything, it’d be ladies underwear.

Anyways, I’ll add Tori Amos to the list. She’s always done things her way (except for that wretched Y Kant Tori Read debacle of the late 80s - which wasn’t her fault). She does a lot of work for women’s issues (like RAINN).

The closest thing she’s done to selling out might be the current “official” bootleg series of concert CDs she (and Sony) are releasing online. IIRC, she’s one of the most bootlegged artists and the idea behind this project is to give her fans quality recordings at a decent price (if you buy two or more, the 2-CD sets are $12.50 each and if you buy the first 5, you get the 6th free w/a custom storage box and stickers)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cardinal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cardinal/32/4000_2.png) [@Cardinal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cardinal)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 4:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/19 "2005-11-16T04:14:58Z")

</div>

Everyone seems to agree that U2 has always tried to make an album they could be proud of. It hasn’t entirely worked, but they meant it at the time, and I don’t think they were phoning it in at any point. I wonder if the Rolling Stones can say the same.

U2’s Zoo TV tour was not a sellout. Anyone who repeats that little glib opinion doesn’t know much about the band. Spectacle does not mean coasting or shallowness.

They also recently turned down a VERY lucrative licensing deal for “Where the Streets Have No Name”:

> [@](#):
>
> [http://lawrenkmills.mu.nu/archives/084265.php](http://lawrenkmills.mu.nu/archives/084265.php)  
> Irish rock band U2 have turned down an offer to license their 1987 hit song “Where the Streets Have No Name” for use in a television ad. U2 front man Bono was quoted as saying, “We almost did. We sat down. I know from my work in Africa what £12.5 million could buy. It was very hard to walk away from £12.5 million”.

They also made no money from the iPod tv ads. They donated the their time and attention-getting because of the massive ad buys that Apple was able to provide, and it was a product they genuinely liked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NDP](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ndp/32/55_2.png) [@NDP](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NDP)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2005, 4:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223/20 "2005-11-16T04:22:15Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Ditto on Prince. Always ready to experiment, always ready to fail. Some of his stuff sucks, but he’s never coasted, which is what I equate with selling out.
> 
> Kate Bush. She mellowed, but that’s exactly because she DOESN’T coast: her stuff stays emotionally true, as she has matured and mellowed.
> 
> David Bowie. Like Prince, Bowie is uneven but always ready to try something new. No coasting there.
> 
> Bjork.
> 
> Greta Garbo.
> 
> George Clooney.
> 
> And hearty agreements from me on Hitchcock, Radiohead, Chaplin, and Watterson.
> 
> As far as Schulz, if you equate selling out with coasting, as I do for the purposes of this thread, Schulz was a major sellout. He shoulda retired 20, 30 years before he died, instead of continuing to crank out shallower and lamer dreck. Early Peanuts was revolutionary and brilliant; later Peanuts was lamer than Marmaduke.

With Schulz, I wouldn’t call it selling out so much as burning out. I don’t think even the most talented among us could do something everyday for 50 years without your quality lagging a bit. Still, at least he seemed to like what he was doing which is probably why he kept at it and since the strip remained immensely popular there was no reason for his superiors at United Feature Syndicate to tell him to quit.

As for those who didn’t sell out, I’ll add R.E.M. and mention Springsteen again.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/artists-who-made-gobs-of-money-but-didnt-sell-out/331223.md?page=2)
