Two stories came up on my newsfeed today.
The first:
The second:
Most scientists do not seem to be too concerned about the second story. See here.
Thank you for this.
<**ThelmaLou **climbs down from the chandelier.>
Didn’t think there was room up there for both of us, didja?
Coronaviruses are good at mutating, which is a bad news/good news proposition. The bad news is that they can mutate - potentially into something more contagious and even deadlier. The good news is, they can mutate just as easily into something harmless or something that eventually leads to its own extinction.
Thanks – I’m glad to hear that.
Maybe I missed it (no coffee yet this morning) but do they think that having had the first strain will give you immunity to the second strain? That’s the part I found most scary – that people who test positive for the antibodies from having had the early strain will go out and about, not realizing they can get the second, more contagious strain.
The objections do not seem unlike any other paper that comes up for peer review. In other words, that is pretty standard. The theory does explain a number of issues that were otherwise puzzling.
This thread seems to suggest this particular mutation won’t do that, although it’s possible that another type of mutation will.
I thought this was going to be about the giant mutant killer murder hornets.
I wondered whose elbow that was.