Aspects of pop culture people seem to misunderstand

Cartoonacy:

I don’t recall that we ever found out the question. (Of course, there is a theory that says if the question were discovered, the universe would be wiped out and replaced by something even more confusing and inexplicable.)

(Another theory states that this has already happened.)

Same thing with the Pink Panther series. In the first movie, the Pink Panther was a jewel stolen by David Niven’s character, who was the movie’s lead. Peter Sellers played a supporting character, the bumbling Inspector Clouseau.

Clouseau was such a popular character that a quickie sequel was made with him as the main character: A Shot In the Dark. Then there was a second sequel, Inspector Clouseau, where Alan Arkin played Clouseau.

After a gap of a few years, Sellers returned to the role and began a series of films playing Clouseau. These films used the Pink Panther in their title to connect with the original film, even though the actual jewel was only mentioned in the first of them: The Return of the Pink Panther, The Pink Panther Strikes Again, and Revenge of the Pink Panther.

After this, things went downhill. Sellers died but they used some leftover footage from previous films to make Trail of the Pink Panther. Then they made a movie where people were looking for the missing Clouseau, Curse of the Pink Panther, with Roger Moore playing a cameo as Clouseau. Then Roberto Benigni played Clouseau’s son in Son of the Pink Panther. And Steve Martin recently rebooted the series with two movies.

So there are eleven Clouseau movies, nine of which have the Pink Panther in the title, even though the Pink Panther jewel only appears in three of them.

Agreed. I was :confused: about Cartoonacy’s reference to three books, as the third book didn’t even touch on the answer or the questions IIRC.

The end of the second book gave us a wrong question - Arthur and Ford had already worked out that it would be wrong before they found it, but thought that it might be a clue to the right question.

The end of the fourth book gives us the theory about the answer and the question cancelling each other out and taking the universe with them.

And it isn’t open to interpretation in any other way. I saw an interview with Kathleen Kennedy(producer) years and years ago where she said she and Spielberg were stunned that anyone thought they were aliens and that their intention had only ever been for it to be clearly robots in the future.

Yes, we discussed this in the Rocky thread just recently. The whole point is that Rocky could never win. He was a nobody. The best he could hope for was not lose quickly - he lasted all 15 rounds. And at the end of the movie, the only thing he cares about is Adrien, not how he did in the match.

Is that true? I watched a string of the episodes, but not from the beginning. We generally see him look at a reflection to see what he looks like, and they obviously used Scott Bakula actually playing the role, but was is specifically stated one way or the other?

A couple of episodes have plot points–sometimes major–that hinge on the idea that this is Sam’s body disguised as the original person.
Thewar veteran amputee episode is the first one that springs to mind. He stands up from his wheelchair and you see what the other person sees and it’s like Phantom Limb from the Venture Brothers. He’s just “floating” on invisible lower legs.

Well, we would occasionally actually see the “jumpees” in some kind of holding room, so it seems obvious that they’re actually switching whole bodies and not just consciousness. (My most vivid memories of this are Dr. Ruth and some kind of vampire or monster or something.)

Another is the episode where he leaps into the space chimp. According to the episode (and NOT true in real life), chimpanzees can’t swim, but Sam manages to do so to save somebody.

Casablanca yes, but which famous line in TESB gets misquoted? :confused:

Don’t forget Lee Harvey.

I would guess “I’m your father, Luke” as opposed to “Luke, I am your father.” (Or something like that.)

I remember Dr Ruth, but not any vampires. The “aura” meant that anyone local to the time period (as well as Sam himself) saw him as whomover he replaced. I also remember an episode involving a pregnant woman and he being very important that Sam leap before the baby was born.

In fairness, many episodes actually list the character as “Doctor Who” in the closing credits, including the first 17 years of the original run as well as the entire Eccleston series. nuWho only changed it to “The Doctor” upon David Tennant’s suggestion when he took over the role.

The actual line is “No. I am your father” with “Luke, I am your father” as the common misquote.
As for Quantum Leap, there was also the time Sam fathered a child during a leap, and she was very much Sam’s bio-daughter, not the daughter of the guy he’d lept into.

The episode right after Dr. Ruth was about Sam leaping into a guy who was (with his wife) involved in some kind of vampire ritual cult, and the very last scene of the Dr. Ruth episode was her leaping back into her life and this guy leaping into the Waiting Room, IIRC, dressed up like a vampire.

Okay, I guess I didn’t see those episodes. Thanks, that clears it up a bit.

I don’t think they actually had the Waiting Room as an actual set until the later seasons. Three episodes of the several that it featured in are from Season 5, I think.

Adding to the sense that they actually transfer bodies, Sam can’t leap unless the current leapee is in the Waiting Room. This was established in one episode where he leaps to a murderer and the murderer escapes the Waiting Room at gunpoint, causing Sam to be stuck.

I figure the creature is the creator’s son, and just as entitled to the name. That makes conversations much easier. (I also still say “Indians”–if anyone objects, I just claim it’s short for “Indigenous Americans.”)

The most obvious one in popular music is probably “Born in the USA”

Or playing Every Breath You Take at your wedding.

Or Wonderful Tonight

Body piercing and tattoos-reaction against “beautiful people”?
I have always been puzzled by the embrace of such extreme body modifications-like multiple piercings-many of the people who have these look grotesque.
Is it a reaction against the “supermodel” type people that are all to common in popular culture? My theory is: if you cannot be “beautiful”, then you can be very ugly-but what’s the point? I find these walking hardware stores quite repulsive.