# AstraZeneca approval in the US

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911>\
**Category:** The Quarantine Zone\
**Tags:** covid-quarantine\
**Created:** [March 15, 2021, 4:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911 "2021-03-15T04:30:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FigNorton](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fignorton/32/5619_2.png) [@FigNorton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FigNorton)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 12:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/321 "2021-04-08T12:10:34Z")

</div>

Do you think it unwise to pause the AZ vaccine for people under 50?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 12:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/322 "2021-04-08T12:20:08Z")

</div>

At current rates of infection it looks like the risk/benefit calculation is still on the side of the AZ vaccine for anyone over 30.

If that calcuation changes my opinion will change

The calcualtion also changes depending on whether such a pause means no vaccination and remaining unprotected, or whether a different vaccine can be substituted immediately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 12:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/323 "2021-04-08T12:21:04Z")

</div>

> [@FigNorton](#):
>
> The risks from covid to younger people.

OK, well that is properly addressed in the article I linked to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FigNorton](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fignorton/32/5619_2.png) [@FigNorton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FigNorton)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 12:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/324 "2021-04-08T12:37:10Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> The calcualtion also changes depending on whether such a pause means no vaccination and remaining unprotected, or whether a different vaccine can be substituted immediately.

I don’t know about that. A healthy 25 yr old woman might be safer “unprotected” over taking the AZ shot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/325 "2021-04-08T14:31:10Z")

</div>

> [@Magiver](#):
>
> Just had it today. No effects 11 hrs later.

OK, hour 12 was painful. I’m zero for 3 on vaccines. Got hit pretty hard with joint pain which is consistent with the reaction I’ve had with flu shots. Your mileage may vary.

IANAD but If this is your general response to flu shots then consider taking an anti-inflammatory before you need it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/326 "2021-04-08T15:28:07Z")

</div>

> [@FigNorton](#):
>
> I don’t know about that. A healthy 25 yr old woman might be safer “unprotected” over taking the AZ shot.

If that is true it is only very slightly true at very low rates of covid infection. It doesn’t take much of a rate increase to tip that balance in favour of the vaccine for all age groups.  
In any case the risk presented by the vaccine is unlikely to rise to the level of, say, the contraceptive pill.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FigNorton](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fignorton/32/5619_2.png) [@FigNorton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FigNorton)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/327 "2021-04-08T15:29:34Z")

</div>

Right, but you don’t hear a lot of people talking about birth control passports.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Treppenwitz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/treppenwitz/32/3445_2.png) [@Treppenwitz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Treppenwitz)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/328 "2021-04-08T16:55:16Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> What should they have done differently? what decisions have they made that they shouldn’t have made? what have they failed to do?

What have they failed to do? The sort of competent pharmacovigilance that allowed several European countries to identify this adverse event before the UK did. What makes it far worse is that the UK has had much more exposure to the vaccine for much longer, compared to these other countries, and should therefore have had access to much more data much earlier - and still we lagged hopelessly behind.

What should they have done differently? It doesn’t help anyone when the UK position is: there’s nothing; the rate in vaccinated people is lower than you’d expect in the general population; there’s five cases; well, thirty; well, seventy-nine with nineteen people dead; if you’re under thirty, you might like to consider a different vaccine; and hold that trial, could you?

There was a time when the MHRA - MCA as it was then - considered itself to be one of the best, if not the best, at pharmacovigilance. I recall being lectured that _it was the MCA_ that pinpointed the improbable-sounding link between tetracycline use and Achilles tendon injury - pinpointed it because their PV was so damn good. Well, on the evidence of this, not any more.

j

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sachertorte](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sachertorte/32/3727_2.png) [@sachertorte](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sachertorte)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 5:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/329 "2021-04-08T17:37:09Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> Unless you have reason to think you are at risk for clotting issues, I don’t think you should be concerned. It’s a pretty rare risk. Birth control pills also carry a risk of blood clots (I forget how great a risk, but it gets higher as you get older and if you smoke, and it got fairly substantial for older women who smoke) but people think the benefit is worth the risk. It probably is for you for this vaccine, too.

Thank you. And thanks to @wolfpup too.  
I don’t know what it is about COVID-19, but it seems like everything feels so dire about it. I’m more chill now. I get JnJ tomorrow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 5:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/330 "2021-04-08T17:42:59Z")

</div>

They got called out for submitting older, more favorable efficacy data to the US. They either missed or hid the data about this complication, while actively disparaging the experts in other countries who were raising valid concerns.

At best, they were lying about how very vigilant they were. They dragged down the WHO and the European Medicines regulator, who both put out statements saying there was no evidence of a link to a blood clot problem, presumably on the basis of false data that was supplied to them.

I wonder if this quote is reflective of an overall attitude. This is from an article about the two leaders of the Oxford team that developed the vaccine, and was in the context of the debunking of the claim that it was ineffective for people over 65.

> “I think we really need people to make positive statements about vaccines to build confidence. Negative comments pose the risk of undermining that confidence,” Pollard told the _Observer_ last week.

Sounds like a potentially problematic attitude, especially for a person in charge to have. I’m not saying he’s the source of the problem, but it could be reflective of an attitude.

Quote from here: [Life savers: the amazing story of the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid vaccine | Coronavirus | The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/14/life-savers-story-oxford-astrazeneca-coronavirus-vaccine-scientists)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FigNorton](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fignorton/32/5619_2.png) [@FigNorton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FigNorton)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 6:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/331 "2021-04-08T18:03:37Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> Unless you have reason to think you are at risk for clotting issues, I don’t think you should be concerned. It’s a pretty rare risk.

Has it actually been pinned down that people getting clots were particularly at risk of blood clots before the vaccine? If this is some kind of vaccine generated autoimmune issue there might be completely different risk factors.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Treppenwitz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/treppenwitz/32/3445_2.png) [@Treppenwitz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Treppenwitz)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/332 "2021-04-08T18:14:43Z")

</div>

See posts 243 and 238.

This is the best/most recent source I have seen in re risk factors. There’s a suggestion that some risk factors to do with health status are involved. I think that’s the best you can say right now.

j

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/333 "2021-04-08T19:11:58Z")

</div>

I think the answer to that question depends on the prevalence of covid and the availability of other vaccines in the region. As i don’t know what region is “pausing AstraZeneca for those under 50”, let alone the answers to the other two questions, i can’t say.

Here in the US it hasn’t even been approved, yet, apparently because they haven’t yet asked for approval.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FigNorton](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fignorton/32/5619_2.png) [@FigNorton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FigNorton)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/334 "2021-04-08T19:17:27Z")

</div>

Germany has paused it for \<60, Canada&France \<55, UK \<30.

Thank you, @Treppenwitz.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 7:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/335 "2021-04-08T19:35:43Z")

</div>

> [@eschrodinger](#):
>
> They either missed or hid the data about this complication,

cite?

> [@eschrodinger](#):
>
> At best, they were lying about how very vigilant they were. They dragged down the WHO and the European Medicines regulator, who both put out statements saying there was no evidence of a link to a blood clot problem, presumably on the basis of false data that was supplied to them.

cite?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 8:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/336 "2021-04-08T20:10:49Z")

</div>

The articles are already posted. If you want to nitpick something, go ahead, but I’m not going to play.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/337 "2021-04-08T20:38:18Z")

</div>

> [@FigNorton](#):
>
> Germany has paused it for \<60, Canada&France \<55, UK \<30.

Numbers in France are pretty high. I’m dubious.  
UK has driven the incidence of covid down pretty far, largely by previously giving AZ vaccine to other people, but yeah, it looks like they can afford to delay vaccination of of the under-30 crowd who are at lower risk any way. Germany and Canada? They both a facing critical shortages of vaccine, and numbers are increasing. But maybe they need to prioritize their elders anyway, so maybe that “pause” for younger people doesn’t have a lot of real-world impact. Perhaps the same is true in France – a “pause” for the less-at-risk is not as big a deal as a total pause, especially if you were going to give most of your vaccine to the more-at-risk.

So… maybe it’s makes sense. I’m glad it’s not my call, honestly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2021, 9:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/338 "2021-04-08T21:13:17Z")

</div>

I’m not sure that the UK is delaying any vaccinations. They have Pfizer now, and will start getting the newly approved Moderna this week. It sounds like it’s just a shift of who gets what vaccine.

> Those aged under 30 are to be offered the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech jabs as an alternative to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine due to [evidence linking it to rare blood clots.](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517)

> Health Secretary Matt Hancock has said there is “more than enough of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine” for the 8.5 million people under 30 who are yet to be vaccinated to have two doses.

> **[Covid vaccine: How many people are vaccinated in the UK?](https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55274833)**
>
> A look at progress made in vaccinating the country, as more than 52 million people have received at least one dose and 38 million have had a booster or third dose.

I believe the UK is still only vaccinating people 50 and older, so the numbers of people under 30 who are eligible for vaccination now will be limited to those who have some other qualification.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2021, 7:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/339 "2021-04-09T07:11:25Z")

</div>

> [@eschrodinger](#):
>
> The articles are already posted. If you want to nitpick something, go ahead, but I’m not going to play.

You are making a claim that Astra Zeneca have knowingly lied to the regulatory agencies.

That is hyperbolic in the extreme and I’ve seen no evidence that that is the case.

If you knew who I worked for you’d maybe be surprised that I back AZ so strongly here but I do find it depressing that AZ are getting so much grief.  
This a company who have acted so quickly to create a vaccine that is very effective, very cheap, easy to distribute, being provided at zero profit and has already saved untold thousands of lives and yet they are still being painted as some sort of villain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2021, 6:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911/340 "2021-04-10T18:46:59Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> This a company who have acted so quickly to create a vaccine that is very effective, very cheap, easy to distribute, being provided at zero profit and has already saved untold thousands of lives and yet they are still being painted as some sort of villain.

I don’t think people are trying to sink AZ’s ship. But they were sponsored to develop their vaccine so the “very cheap” price is due in part to the research money they received. Their zero profit is admirable and worthy of your support.

As has been posted already, they have had problems with accurately reporting their numbers.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911.md?page=16)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/astrazeneca-approval-in-the-us/937911.md?page=18)
