# Attention: Any EARNEST use in political discussion of the following terms brands the user an idiot

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 20, 2011, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381 "2011-01-20T21:34:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/1 "2011-01-20T21:34:45Z")

</div>

To start with, from the RW side:

Obamacare  
Obamanomics  
death panel  
warmist  
glow-ball warming  
Islamofascist  
Democrat Party  
Demonrats  
Dhimmis  
Dummiez  
Essentially, any disparaging variation on “Democrats”  
From the LW side:

Repugnican  
Rethugnican  
Essentially, any disparaging variation on “Republicans”

And . . . that’s about it. “Teabagger” might be in poor taste but is not idiotic. “Teahadist” is just too **kewl** to be idiotic. Any use of “bigots” might be a real **subject** for debate and might sometimes be idiotic but does not by itself brand the user an idiot.

Godwinization is _sui generis._

“Fascist” is probably idiotic-by-default but does not, by itself, constitute Godwinization. But it’s **always** a mark of idiocy, and dishonesty too, when RWs use it to describe anything on the left.

Anything I forgot to list?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/2 "2011-01-20T21:43:06Z")

</div>

Any sentence containing both “Clinton” and “blow job” is unlikely to lead to productive discourse. (Except the first sentence in this post, naturally.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/3 "2011-01-20T21:44:14Z")

</div>

Variants on dhimmitude would be acceptable in context of non-muslims being second-class citizens _in Muslim countries_ (a context it almost never has). Since even if this happens in America it would not be until long after those who worry about it are dead, it is inappropriate to discussions of America’s relationship with Islam.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 9:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/4 "2011-01-20T21:49:03Z")

</div>

“Pubbies”.

In a generic sense:

“Thrown under the bus”  
“All eyes on…”  
“Civil discourse” (fuck that).

Any mention whatsoever of the Kardashians.\*  
\*I know, they don’t usually come up in political discussion but I am tired of seeing references to and/or photos of these horrendously plasticky-looking, useless humanoids.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 9:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/5 "2011-01-20T21:54:36Z")

</div>

> [@Jackmannii](#):
>
> “Pubbies”.

No . . . not, I think, idiotic. “Pubs” and “Dems” certainly are not idiotic, merely shorthand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ogre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ecb155/32.png) [@Ogre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ogre)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/6 "2011-01-20T21:55:07Z")

</div>

Rightards.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/7 "2011-01-20T21:55:58Z")

</div>

> [@Jackmannii](#):
>
> Any mention whatsoever of the Kardashians.\*  
> \*I know, they don’t usually come up in political discussion but I am tired of seeing references to and/or photos of these horrendously plasticky-looking, useless humanoids.

Could be worse.

Could be Sarah Jessica Parker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chimera](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/8e8cbc/32.png) [@Chimera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chimera)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/8 "2011-01-20T22:03:25Z")

</div>

Libtards

Seriously, just grow the fuck up and go back to 3rd grade already.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ogre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ecb155/32.png) [@Ogre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ogre)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/9 "2011-01-20T22:06:26Z")

</div>

Also, “tighty-righty”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/10 "2011-01-20T22:11:20Z")

</div>

“Anti-choice” or “anti-life”.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/11 "2011-01-20T23:04:22Z")

</div>

“Tard” conjoined with **any** political/ideological designation.

“Corporate lackeys” in any context except to designate media organizations, pundits, scientists, etc., that are actually and literally paid to promote corporations’ positions.

“Liberal elite”.

“Confederacy” to refer to the modern southern US.

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> And . . . that’s about it.

Honey, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/12 "2011-01-20T23:06:52Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> “Anti-choice” or “anti-life”.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

Agreed. Or “pro-life.” The non-idiotic phrase would be “anti-abortion.” Everyone who is not omnicidal is “pro-life.”

NARAL, OTOH, is properly “pro-choice,” not “pro-abortion” – that is, does not regard abortion as a duty or an end-in-itself. But to the other side, **stopping** abortion is an end-in-itself, therefore, “anti-abortion.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 11:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/13 "2011-01-20T23:09:20Z")

</div>

> [@Ogre](#):
>
> Also, “tighty-righty”.

Not a chance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_Tildrum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e95f7d/32.png) [@Tom\_Tildrum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tom_Tildrum)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 11:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/14 "2011-01-20T23:14:48Z")

</div>

You left off “socialist.”

(Unless you’re including it as an understood variation of “Democrats.” :D)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2011, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/15 "2011-01-20T23:49:47Z")

</div>

I’ve heard that the Kardashians are all Islamofascists, every last one of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2011, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/16 "2011-01-21T00:09:01Z")

</div>

> [@Tom\_Tildrum](#):
>
> You left off “socialist.”
> 
> (Unless you’re including it as an understood variation of “Democrats.” :D)

I was trying to omit any term that has legitimate non-idiotic uses.

However, in the U.S. at present, if you see the word “socialist” used by, or of, anyone other than a self-ID’d socialist, it is probably being used idiotically.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2011, 12:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/17 "2011-01-21T00:11:26Z")

</div>

> [@Kimstu](#):
>
> “Confederacy” to refer to the modern southern US.

😕 You made that one up, right? I live in Florida and I’ve never heard anyone say, “Here in the Confederacy . . .”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kidchameleon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/898d66/32.png) [@kidchameleon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kidchameleon)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2011, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/18 "2011-01-21T00:16:05Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> 😕 You made that one up, right? I live in Florida and I’ve never heard anyone say, “Here in the Confederacy . . .”

More like, “Down there in the Confederacy…”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![interface2x](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/c0e974/32.png) [@interface2x](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/interface2x)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2011, 12:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/19 "2011-01-21T00:18:30Z")

</div>

It doesn’t come up much anymore now, but a couple of years ago, any use of the name “Shrub” got me all rolly-eyed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2011, 12:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381/20 "2011-01-21T00:24:15Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Agreed. Or “pro-life.” The non-idiotic phrase would be “anti-abortion.” Everyone who is not omnicidal is “pro-life.”
> 
> NARAL, OTOH, is properly “pro-choice,” not “pro-abortion” – that is, does not regard abortion as a duty or an end-in-itself. But to the other side, **stopping** abortion is an end-in-itself, therefore, “anti-abortion.”

There are many who are pro-choice who are anti-abortion. So just go with pro-life and pro-choice, since those are what each group uses for themselves.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/attention-any-earnest-use-in-political-discussion-of-the-following-terms-brands-the-user-an-idiot/568381.md?page=2)
