Automobile MPG in the past

The car holding up and the driver surviving are two completely (and mostly contrary) goals. Take a look upthread for the Malibu vs Malibu collision test.

See Post 30. Better yet, click here.

The '59 vs. '09 Chevy crash video is somewhat controversial in that that for a few years in the late 50’s and early 60’s GM used an x-frame design instead of a full H-frame on some of their full-size cars, the '59 Bel Air included. This design was criticized at the time for being too weak, especially in a side-collision. So not that anyone’s going to take a full-frame '59 Ford (for example) over the new Malibu, but a full-frame car might not have crumpled up as dramatically and plus it might have done a lot more damage to the new car.

Yeah, that kinda looks like the steering wheel and throtle. The throtle lever gives higher engine speeds. There was also something that looked like a hand brake on the left side of the driver which was used to shift gears also, and is not in your photo.

I seem to remember that you have to push in the gas pedal when you stop at a light, and then you ease off the pedal to start getting going, sorta like the opposite of todays cars.

I seem to remember that the model T went along at 40+ some miles per hour, more than enough to drive into town and around town even today. It also had high road clearance and it could go down roads or fields that todays cars cannot get thru.

Its a nice car to drive.

Here’s the thing, when you ask many dudes about their MPG, they remember selectively. You remember the great run you had on one car, with a light foot on the gas petal and all freeway miles, but forget the city driving that is close to half that.

Ancedotal evidence is not worth much. :frowning:

yeah, my car was rated at 22/30 using the pre-2008 EPA ratings, and I turned a solid 36 on the highway at a steady 75 mph cruise driving to Indy one fall. 'course, my normal driving nets me 26 which is far less impressive.