# Bad analogy in the wine piece

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147>\
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\
**Created:** [March 29, 2008, 5:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147 "2008-03-29T05:41:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rbeggs](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/977dab/32.png) [@rbeggs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rbeggs)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2008, 5:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/1 "2008-03-29T05:41:44Z")

</div>

Cecil,

I’m visiting your city and happened to pick up the March 27th issue of Chicago Reader. You use an analogy in your Straight Dope piece that’s inappropriate and at the very least, mildly offensive.

“Just as there are people who own stereo systems capable of producing sound at a level of detail that no one of our species can possibly appreciate, there are people who feel that only a barnyard animal would consider drinking wine from anything but a crystal glass of a shape optimized for the specific grapes involved.”

In fact, the very best stereo system obtainable still can’t, and arguably may never, exceed the human ears ability to register dynamic range, sonic detail and incredibly minute amounts of distortion. Granted, many people lack the ability, desire or need to develop a sophisticated ear. These people shouldn’t and usually don’t go down the high end path. Others own the equipment of which you speak for the wrong reasons. There are also people who can perceive and appreciate the sonic subtleties you disparage, and what’s more, aren’t offensive about it. My livelihood and that of many who work in fields encompassed by professional audio and music happens to depend on that ability.

Richard Beggs, motion picture sound designer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2008, 5:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/2 "2008-03-29T05:58:57Z")

</div>

Hi **rbeggs**! It’s considered polite here to include a link to the column you’re referencing. I suspect [this](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/080328.html) is the one you had in mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Threadkiller](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/aca169/32.png) [@Threadkiller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Threadkiller)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2008, 7:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/3 "2008-03-29T07:13:12Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=rbeggs]  
In fact, the very best stereo system obtainable still can’t, and arguably may never, exceed the human ears ability to register dynamic range, sonic detail and incredibly minute amounts of distortion…There are also people who can perceive and appreciate the sonic subtleties you disparage, and what’s more, aren’t offensive about it. My livelihood and that of many who work in fields encompassed by professional audio and music happens to depend on that ability…  
[/QUOTE]

Prepare to be attacked mr. Beggs, just know that you bring this on yourself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tapioca_Dextrin)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2008, 8:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/4 "2008-03-29T08:58:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cecil]  
“Just as there are people who own stereo systems capable of producing sound at a level of detail that no one of our species can possibly appreciate, there are people who feel that only a barnyard animal would consider drinking wine from anything but a crystal glass of a shape optimized for the specific grapes involved.”  
[/QUOTE]

I think Cecil was indulging in a little hyperbole there. Coincidentally, the hyperbole is the optimum wine glass shape for tasting the wines of Southern Paraguay.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![guizot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guizot/32/3636_2.png) [@guizot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/guizot)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2008, 10:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/5 "2008-03-29T10:04:42Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Tapioca Dextrin]  
I think Cecil was indulging in a little hyperbole there. Coincidentally, the hyperbole is the optimum wine glass shape for tasting the wines of Southern Paraguay.  
[/QUOTE]  
I’ll have you know that I possess that particular glass, and it is _not_ shaped like a hyperbole. It’s a parabola.

Have you tried the 07s from French Guyana?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2008, 11:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/6 "2008-03-29T11:19:02Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=rbeggs]  
In fact, the very best stereo system obtainable still can’t, and arguably may never, exceed the human ears ability to register dynamic range, sonic detail and incredibly minute amounts of distortion.  
[/QUOTE]  
It’s all relative. My ears can hardly register a doorbell any more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2008, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/7 "2008-03-29T15:51:36Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=rbeggs]  
In fact, the very best stereo system obtainable still can’t, and arguably may never, exceed the human ears ability to register dynamic range, sonic detail and incredibly minute amounts of distortion.  
[/QUOTE]

I notice that you don’t mention frequency in there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rbeggs](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/977dab/32.png) [@rbeggs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rbeggs)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2008, 6:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/8 "2008-03-30T06:01:13Z")

</div>

Exapno,

True about frequency. Frequency response was pretty much licked by the '70’s. 30Hz to 18kHz or 20kHz is not at all uncommon even with a middling investment. But by our 40’s a lot of us can’t top 15k with our battered ears so there you go. The headbanging, rock and roll generation is in really bad shape. Many people in their 30’s have hearing abilities once relegated to the '60’s or latter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjimm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@jjimm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjimm)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2008, 10:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/9 "2008-03-30T10:52:23Z")

</div>

I fail to see how anything could be construed as “offensive” in that column. Unless, of course, you’re a barnyard animal. (When you’re not looking, they’re all swilling Chateauneuf-du-Pape out of Waterford crystal goblets.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![detop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/bcef8e/32.png) [@detop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/detop)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2008, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/10 "2008-03-30T15:16:53Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=guizot]  
Have you tried the 07s from French Guyana?  
[/QUOTE]

Which one ? the red, the white or the puce one ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2008, 6:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/11 "2008-03-30T18:30:05Z")

</div>

deleted - wrong thread

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cagey\_Drifter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b2d939/32.png) [@Cagey\_Drifter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cagey_Drifter)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2008, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/12 "2008-03-30T21:01:29Z")

</div>

According to this seemingly even-handed [Slate article](http://www.slate.com/id/2069343/), the shape of the glass does affect flavor due to its influence on where the wine falls on one’s palate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bonzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/45deac/32.png) [@bonzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bonzer)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2008, 11:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/13 "2008-03-30T23:20:17Z")

</div>

Possibly just as well that **rbeggs** never stumbled acoss [this (very) old Cecil column](http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_182.html).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Indistinguishable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/90ced4/32.png) [@Indistinguishable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Indistinguishable)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2008, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/14 "2008-03-30T23:34:37Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cagey Drifter]  
According to this seemingly even-handed [Slate article](http://www.slate.com/id/2069343/), the shape of the glass does affect flavor due to its influence on where the wine falls on one’s palate.  
[/QUOTE]

But what would that matter? I thought the whole thing about different parts of the tongue being sensitive to different tastes was simply a persistent but erroneous myth.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Askance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/askance/32/8281_2.png) [@Askance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Askance)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2008, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/15 "2008-03-31T01:00:33Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cagey Drifter]  
According to this seemingly even-handed [Slate article](http://www.slate.com/id/2069343/), the shape of the glass does affect flavor due to its influence on where the wine falls on one’s palate.  
[/QUOTE]  
That’s what the **Riedel** people told me. But that could only possibly have any effect for the fraction of a second when wine was on that part of your palate but nowhere else. Soon the wine is everywhere in your mouth and the aroma is up your nose, so I just don’t believe it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FoieGrasIsEvil](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foiegrasisevil/32/16638_2.png) [@FoieGrasIsEvil](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FoieGrasIsEvil)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2008, 3:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/16 "2008-03-31T15:21:21Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=rbeggs]  
Exapno,

True about frequency. Frequency response was pretty much licked by the '70’s. 30Hz to 18kHz or 20kHz is not at all uncommon even with a middling investment. But by our 40’s a lot of us can’t top 15k with our battered ears so there you go. The headbanging, rock and roll generation is in really bad shape. Many people in their 30’s have hearing abilities once relegated to the '60’s or latter.  
[/QUOTE]

I was thinking about this, too. Producers of SACD players claim frequency response upwards of 80kHz, which I understood to be inaudible to the human ear. “So if you can’t hear it, what’s the point?”, I thought.  
But I also have read in some audiophile mags that the reproduction of these upper-range frequencies **can** be perceived by audiophiles with a finely tuned ear as an “extension of detail or ambience” that isn’t captured on standard recording/playback formats.

So with regards to wine glasses, I thought it was a pretty clever analogy, myself, because just like audiophiles that have trained ears, oenophiles have highly sensitive and practiced noses and palates, and they have demonstrated that certain varietals are more expansive and expressive given certain glass shapes and surface to air exposure ratios. The carbonation effect with flutes for sparkling wines is well understood as well.

Of course, as always, YMMV, and there is certainly a proportion of people that own these glasses because they can afford them, not that they can appreciate them, just as some affluent people buy the best stereo they can afford without every fully appreciating it’s capabiities.

And the image of barnyard animals swilling CdP from Waterford goblets had me rolling! Especially since many Southern Rhone reds have that “barnyardy” descriptor attached to their bouquets!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OneCentStamp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/13edae/32.png) [@OneCentStamp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OneCentStamp)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2008, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/17 "2008-03-31T18:01:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=rbeggs]  
Many people in their 30’s have hearing abilities once relegated to the '60’s or latter.  
[/QUOTE]  
I’m sorry, would you mind repeating that, a little louder? Here, say it into my right ear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NinetyWt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/cc9497/32.png) [@NinetyWt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NinetyWt)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2008, 7:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/18 "2008-03-31T19:24:39Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=guizot]  
it is _not_ shaped like a hyperbole. It’s a parabola.

[/QUOTE]

Mine’s [both](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraboloid).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mikemike2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mikemike2/32/305_2.png) [@Mikemike2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mikemike2)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2008, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/19 "2008-03-31T19:59:36Z")

</div>

Mr. Beggs, I believe Cecil was referring to the “more expensive must be better” snobbery frequently seen by wine connoisseurs and audiophiles. One example that has been recently discussed is whether extremely expensive speaker wire (hundreds of dollars per foot) can improve the sound over high quality wire that costs several dollars per foot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b2d939/32.png) [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C_K_Dexter_Haven)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2008, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147/20 "2008-03-31T21:30:05Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Indistinguishable]  
But what would that matter? I thought the whole thing about different parts of the tongue being sensitive to different tastes was simply a persistent but erroneous myth.  
[/QUOTE]  
Agreed, the notion that different parts of the tongue are differently sensitized is well disproved. Methinks that, perhaps, the Riedel folks have a very sophisticated sales approach that is effective with those who are vulnerable to such things.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bad-analogy-in-the-wine-piece/443147.md?page=2)
