Barack the Magic Negro

:eek:

One wonderful thing about our Pretty Lady (and before her, Pretty Black Girl) is the way in which she protects our fish. She knows very well they exist for us, and she is quick to chase off neighborhood critters who approach the waterfalls too closely. She sits with us on the benches while we feed them, and never ventures too close to the water’s edge for fear of freaking us out. A good cat is an absolute necessity for quality country living.

I think I said both “president” and “presidency.” The president is merely the chief executive of one of three co-equal branches of government. And it’s a nice trick of propaganda to bar criticism of an individual because of his temporary posting.

For my part, the office of the presidency has been irreversibly tarnished by the one-time occupancy (and activities) in it of Richard Milhaus Nixon. The elections of 1984, 1988, and especially 2004 do not support an argument that the American people on the whole object to insulting it.

But for the most part the objects of the do-gooding are not the ones doing the sneering, rather, those who are made to look bad by comparison.

I think the gist of Thoreau’s point is that what you consider good, I might consider a pile of shit … and vice versa.

There seriously needs to be a third party of made up of former Republicans who aren’t complete morons, homophobes and racists.

Exorcism insn’t magic?

But Barack Obama isn’t the president. And he isn’t a candidate for president. During a campaign, it’s understandable that one’s opponents will play up whatever negatives they can point to in order to build up a groundswell of opposition on behalf of their preferred candidate. And during a presidency, the office-holder get criticized for making mistakes in hope that he’ll learn the error of his way and change his attitiude so he won’t make more.

But there’s no reason to try to get people to dislike Obama and he hasn’t done anything wrong as president. The Republicans are just trying to humiliate him and his supporters out of sheer hostility.

That wasn’t the argument in Yarrow’s statement that I was disputing.

Yeah, but I don’t think the three of us are going to have much political clout. :smiley:

So “negro” is an offensive word? I’m genuinely ignorant of that. All the while, I thought only n****r was offensive. I keep hearing “negro” used in many ways like “negro spiritual” or “negroid characteristics”. If I have offended, I apologize - it’s ignorance not malice.

I don’t think that’s the point. “Barack the Magic Black Guy” would be offensive too. But, yeah, “Negro” has been disfavoured as a label for a person since the mid-1960s.

The phrase “negro spiritual” does sound old-fashioned, but it’s qualitatively different from “He’s a negro.” It’s difficult to explain, but that’s the way it is.

“Negroid characteristics” borders on offensive because use of the term seems to imply acceptance of certain racist assumptions, such as there are such things as negroid characteristics.

And yet they represent a blithering fucknut like Starving Artist just fine, which is really all we need to know.

I was disagreeing with what you said rather than what you did, Lib.

There’s the old janitor in “The Terminal”, too.

FWIW, I’ve noticed two changes lately: I seem to be returning to my acrimonious self, which I don’t much like and am trying to move away from, and I’ve noticed that you’ve been being relatively acrimonious-free, which I appreciate. Hopefully there are no meaningful grudges on either side. Likewise, I’ll try not to get on your nerves either :).

Daniel

You’ve obviously never watched Gandhi.

Doesn’t Gunga Din count too, come to think of it?

Well, there was the movie The Indian in the Cupboard.

:dubious:

Are you sure you’re not being whooshed by a succession of dogs in cats’ pajamas?