# Barney Frank criticism of Democratic Party

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [May 5, 2026, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811 "2026-05-05T18:36:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/61 "2026-05-06T21:00:57Z")

</div>

What I’m saying is that maybe we don’t emphasize it or make it a cause. Maybe don’t pass any anti or pro trans legislation at all, and concentrate on more important stuff like shoring up the Federal government against future wannabe-dictators and tyrants. Or cliimate change. Or NATO, or economic inequality and uncertainty. Just about anything other than a highly divisive and controversial issue that ultimately affects a vanishingly tiny number of people relative to the country as a whole.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/62 "2026-05-06T21:01:36Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> So they could avoid promoting trans rights publicly, get elected, and then quietly get pro-trans stuff done once in office.

Or _not_ get in office because millions of their base stay home, since they just see it as another example of how the Democrats consistently stab their own supporters in the back in favor of right wing bigotry. And it’s not like they’d get votes from the transphobics, short of outright calling for the persecution of the transgendered.

I should note that one of the most consistent opinions I see from LGBTQ people is the assumption that the Democrats _will_ backstab them the moment they think they can pander to the Right by doing so. It’s taken as a given. The Democrats aren’t allies, just the best tool to claw back agaisnt the Republicans a little.

Right wing straight white men are the constituency the Democrats care about the most and desperately want to please, and they’ll sacrifice their supporters in a moment to try to do so no matter how many times it fails to work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/63 "2026-05-06T21:13:17Z")

</div>

> [@bump](#):
>
> What I’m saying is that maybe we don’t emphasize it or make it a cause.

So, just let Republicans do whatever they want to them? Revoke their drivers licenses? Fine. Outlaw their healthcare? Better not take a position on it! Lock them up for wearing the wrong gendered clothing in public? Not worth the effort to fight it!

And when this tactic fails, which of us are you going to sacrifice next on the altar of appeasing bigots? Gay people aren’t a big chunk of the population, either. You want to throw us under the bus next?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/64 "2026-05-06T21:19:56Z")

</div>

The article linked to in the OP cites Frank talking specifically about **sports**. Sports is, at the end of the day, people crossing the finish line on a race, swimming in a pool, putting a ball through a basketball hoop.

If Republicans were talking about denying trans people the ability to drive, vote, or own a house, that would be one thing. But sports is sports. Nobody lives or dies from being given admission to participate in a 400-meter sprint or not.

Is this an issue that’s worth the risk of losing elections on? Notably, this is the _only_ trans issue on which majority public sentiment is against the trans side.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/65 "2026-05-06T21:26:48Z")

</div>

It is Republicans who make Trans rights a cause when they try to trample those rights. Anyone who thinks that Democrats should just lie back and enjoy it: Stay off of my side.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crowmanyclouds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crowmanyclouds/32/19884_2.png) [@crowmanyclouds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crowmanyclouds)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/66 "2026-05-06T21:28:20Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> If Republicans were talking about denying trans people the ability to drive, vote

There’s no _if_ about those.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/67 "2026-05-06T21:33:33Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> The article linked to in the OP cites Frank talking specifically about **sports**.

Do you understand that the Republicans are not stopping at sports in their crusade to erase trans people from public life?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/68 "2026-05-06T21:33:47Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> Is this an issue that’s worth the risk of losing elections on? Notably, this is the _only_ trans issue on which majority public sentiment is against the trans side.

And you give in on one issue, and they’ll use that as a hammer to start in on others; that’s how wedge issues work. And there’s no reason to think that throwing trans athletes to the wolves (and more than them, women athletes in general get lumped in for persecution) would help win elections.

When has caving in to the Right on anything _ever_ had a good result?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/69 "2026-05-06T21:50:17Z")

</div>

So the solution is: Continue with a stance (trans MtF belong in and should play in women’s sports,) absorb the unpopularity it brings (in the D’s favor, this is indeed still a relatively minor issue on the overall scale of polling things) and hope for the best election outcomes in an era of very narrow electoral margins?

It might work, but in this era, the Ds don’t have much electoral winning margin to play around in most races, especially considering the Republicans’ built-in advantages in gerrymandering, Electoral College and whatnot. Every lost 1% or 0.5% matters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/70 "2026-05-06T21:52:43Z")

</div>

If Dems cave on the issue, and they still lose, which part of the Democratic base do you want to sacrifice next?

Is it going to be a part that you’re a member of, or are you just expecting other people to make sacrifices for you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/71 "2026-05-06T21:56:15Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> So the solution is: Continue with a stance (trans MtF belong in and should play in women’s sports,) absorb the unpopularity it brings (in the D’s favor, this is indeed still a relatively minor issue on the overall scale of polling things) and hope for the best election outcomes in an era of very narrow electoral margins?

Again; you are just _assuming_ that backstabbing their base yet again will win them more votes, which in real life never actually works. Why should we think that the result won’t be, yet again, zero gains in return for people staying home and not bothering to vote for them because it’s pointless?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 9:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/72 "2026-05-06T21:58:51Z")

</div>

Yeah as mentioned the problem with wedge issues IS that they’re a wedge.

There may be times, yeah, sure I can imagine, you’d find the best you can do when they come at you with stuff about restrooms or sports or what-is-a-woman is say “no I’m not going to answer your dumb trick question, let me tell you about what we need to make everyone’s life better”. Or “that is not what human rights is about, and you know it”. And they’ll accuse you of evading and so what. You can’t always “own” the other guy in the discussion live as it happens. What you can do is get ahead of it, let it be seen you support a progressive position on rights, **AND** present a general platform that benefits all.

As **Tamerlane** put it, it’s likely the case Frank finds himself in the situation where the progressive leading edge has lapped him. But in such cases we can just listen politely then go ahead and anyway do what is right and appropriate now.

(I’ve mentioned in some other discussions, that there are many situations in which what we see is people being progressive _until society progresses to where they wanted it to progress_ and then pivot to trying to secure and make permanent THAT.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/73 "2026-05-06T22:03:25Z")

</div>

> [@JRDelirious](#):
>
> I can imagine, you’d find the best you can do when they come at you with stuff about restrooms or sports or what-is-a-woman is say “no I’m not going to answer your dumb trick question, let me tell you about what we need to make everyone’s life better”

Although that maybe takes a different tone if you’re a candidate replying to a debate moderator asking about sports, while the other candidate hasn’t actually said anything yet…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stratocaster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stratocaster/32/16393_2.png) [@Stratocaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stratocaster)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/74 "2026-05-06T22:06:45Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> So they could avoid promoting trans rights publicly, get elected, and then quietly get pro-trans stuff done once in office.

Not a perfect analogy, but I believe this was Obama’s view on SSM. Just my opinion, of course, but I don’t believe he ever bought all that “marriage is between one man and one woman” jive. But he recognized that, at that point, any other position meant he was toast.

Was that cowardly or a realpolitik concession? I think the latter. You can’t be so pure that you don’t get elected. Once in office, your “views evolve.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 10:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/75 "2026-05-06T22:12:00Z")

</div>

I can see the bumper stickers now: “Democrats would win more elections if they only allowed more suffering to occur.”

Nice philosophy; I’ll sleep well knowing I don’t share it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 10:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/76 "2026-05-06T22:12:13Z")

</div>

What evidence do you have that, if some Democrats changed their stance, this would translate to more votes? You realize they could lose votes as well, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stratocaster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stratocaster/32/16393_2.png) [@Stratocaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stratocaster)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 10:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/77 "2026-05-06T22:15:55Z")

</div>

Sleep well then! But politics is, of course, the art of the possible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 10:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/78 "2026-05-06T22:50:34Z")

</div>

> [@Stratocaster](#):
>
> But politics is, of course, the art of the possible.

It’s also the art of the _desirable,_ and turning into the enemy isn’t victory.

And as has been pointed out multiple times, the claim that sacrificing the transgender population would actually help the Democrats instead of hurt them is an extremely doubtful assertion with a lot of history against it working.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/79 "2026-05-06T23:06:49Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> I’ll also point out that the Democrats have a reputation for abandoning their own supporters in order to make failed attempts to pander to the Right

This is not true.

> [@HMS\_Irruncible](#):
>
> How can they when the Republican messaging is “Dems want trans in sports.”

Same thing we do when the GOP say things like “the democrats want to take you guns away” and other MAGA lies. Ignore the lie, and repeat the stance on LBGT+ rights.

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> So the solution is: Continue with a stance (trans MtF belong in and should play in women’s sports,) absorb the unpopularity it brings (in the D’s favor, this is indeed still a relatively minor issue on the overall scale of polling things) and hope for the best election outcomes in an era of very narrow electoral margins?

No, simply continue with the stance about LBGT+ rights. The Dems dont need to respond to every MAGA lie, or every lifeboat case. Just keep repeating their stance on LBGT+ rights.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2026, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811/80 "2026-05-06T23:25:29Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> This is not true.

It’s true, I’ve heard it enough times to know that they have such a reputation.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/barney-frank-criticism-of-democratic-party/1029811.md?page=5)
