# Baseball fans, can you explain some stuff to me?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [June 28, 2002, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399 "2002-06-28T15:38:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2002, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/21 "2002-06-29T17:11:31Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> What I want to know is why Oklahoma, Memphis, Nashville, Iowa, and Omaha are in the Pacific Coast League.

As I understand it (and I haven’t googled this out, so I’ll welcome correction), there were three AAA minor leagues (next step below major league) for most of the 20th Century: the International League in (eastern) Canada and the East Coast, the American Association (not to be confused with the 19th Century major league of the same name) in the Midwest, and the Pacific Coast League, which strangely enough was in cities on or near its eponymous shoreline.

A decade or so ago, the AA dissolved, and member teams were incorporated into the other two AAA leagues, the eastern ones going to the IL and the western ones to the PCL.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickM](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7feea3/32.png) [@PatrickM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickM)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2002, 6:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/22 "2002-06-29T18:40:04Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by dantheman \*  
> \*\*
> 
> I wandered over to ESPN’s Minor League Baseball section, and clicked on the Pacific Coast League and checked out last night’s games. Now this I can’t quite grasp - some games used the DH, and others did not. Why? \*\*

This is a WAG, but if the teams playing were both National League farm teams they could agree among themselves not to use the DH, since their pitchers will have to bat for themselves if and when they get promoted to the majors and might as well get some practice at doing so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickM](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7feea3/32.png) [@PatrickM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickM)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2002, 6:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/23 "2002-06-29T18:42:29Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by zev\_steinhardt \*  
> \*\*
> 
> \<snip\>  
> Actually, **mullinator** , the DH is used everywhere in Organized Baseball except for the National League. All minor leagues in Organized Baseball use the DH.
> 
> Zev Steinhardt \*\*

Zev, do both the Japanese major leagues use the DH now? I dimly recall that one of them didn’t use to allow the DH.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dantheman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dantheman/32/9421_2.png) [@dantheman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dantheman)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2002, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/24 "2002-06-29T18:58:38Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by PatrickM \*  
> \*\*This is a WAG, but if the teams playing were both National League farm teams they could agree among themselves not to use the DH, since their pitchers will have to bat for themselves if and when they get promoted to the majors and might as well get some practice at doing so. \*\*

This makes sense to me, but I guess I can’t understand how some teams in the same league could play by one set of rules and other teams (whom they play) play by another set. Makes no sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DAVEW0071](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e19b73/32.png) [@DAVEW0071](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DAVEW0071)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2002, 7:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/25 "2002-06-29T19:12:26Z")

</div>

Let’s make sure we know the likely genesis of the Clemens-Piazza feud.

During an interleague game, Piazza won it for the Mets with a grand slam home run off Clemens. The next time they faced each other, which was, I believe a year, maybe two years later, Clemens gave Piazza a concussion with a fastball, causing Piazza to miss playing in the All-Star Game. Then, during the World Series, there was the infamous bat-throwing incident.

IMO, whether it was an intentional miss or not when the pitch went behind Clemens at Shea this year, it worked even better than actually hitting him. It sent the message to him, caused both benches to be warned, thus taking the beanball away from Clemens, and didn’t put a man on base. Pitching to an AL pitcher should result in an out 39 times out of 40, after all.

Having said that, I think Clemens’s hatred of the Mets in general goes back to Game Six of the 1986 World Series. He could have been the winning pitcher in the final game of Boston’s first world championship since 1918. Instead, he gets a no-decision, and Bill Buckner is the Red Sox player everyone remembers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jackelope](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a6a055/32.png) [@jackelope](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jackelope)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2002, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/26 "2002-06-29T23:13:43Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by dougie\_monty \*  
> \*\*According to a records book published by _The Sporting News,_ the first AL player to be walked intentionally–with the bases full, yet!-- was Napoleon Lajoie, of Philadelphia. This was in 1901, when he hit .422, an average not equalled in the league since. \*\*

I hate to be a nit-picker, but…

Wait a minute; obviously I _love_ to be a nit-picker, since I’m even posting this.

Anyway, [baseball-reference.com](http://baseball-reference.com), which I’ve always found to be a reliable site for those of us with WAYYY too much time on our hands, says that in 1901 Nap Lajoie batted .426, not .422.

> **[Nap Lajoie Stats | Baseball-Reference.com](https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/l/lajoina01.shtml)**
>
> Career: 82 HR, .338 BA (24th), 1599 RBI (37th), 2B/1B, HOF in 1937, Naps/Phillies/... 1896-1916, b:R/t:R, 5x BA Leader, born in RI 1874, died 1959

The only modern-era player to come close was Ted Williams, who hit .406 in 1941. Amazingly, Lajoie played for 21 seasons and had a _career_ average of .338, higher than many players ever go for a single season.

Hmm… it’s easy to get distracted browsing this site. For instance, how does Paul Schreiber play baseball from 1922-1945 and have only three at-bats? Answer: he doesn’t. He plays 10 games in 22 and 23, and then comes back in 45 to play two more games. Also he’s a pitcher, and his first two seasons are with an AL team (which keeps this from becoming a complete hijack–whew!).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e36b37/32.png) [@Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Airman_Doors_USAF)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2002, 11:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/27 "2002-06-29T23:28:58Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by dantheman \*  
> \*\*
> 
> It might just be an issue of semantics, but it is impossible to steal first base. When the catcher drops the ball on the third strike, the batter can be safe if he beats the throw - but it’s definitely not a stolen base.\*\*

That may be the case now, but a long time ago it WAS done. See the immortal [Germany Schaefer](http://www.deadball.com/schaefer.htm). It’s a good story. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jackelope](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a6a055/32.png) [@jackelope](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jackelope)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2002, 11:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/28 "2002-06-29T23:43:41Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Airman Doors, USAF \*  
> \*\*
> 
> That may be the case now, but a long time ago it WAS done. See the immortal [Germany Schaefer](http://www.deadball.com/schaefer.htm). It’s a good story. 🙂 \*\*

Good point; I’d heard that story before but had forgotten who did it. I think **dantheman** ’s point, though, is that while a batter can run to first on a dropped third strike, it’s not actually _called_ a stolen base.

Stealing first from second, though, would probably count. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DAVEW0071](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e19b73/32.png) [@DAVEW0071](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DAVEW0071)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 1:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/29 "2002-06-30T01:10:41Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Stealing first from second, though, would probably count.

I believe stealing first from second is expressly forbidden in the official Baseball Rule Book.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dantheman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dantheman/32/9421_2.png) [@dantheman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dantheman)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/30 "2002-06-30T01:22:46Z")

</div>

You believe correct - apparently because of ol’ Germany Schaefer!

I remember that story, now. Thanks for the link, **Airman**. (In fact, I checked out Germany on Google and found a few other links confirming it - was wondering if it was an urban legend.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dougie\_monty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/439d5e/32.png) [@dougie\_monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dougie_monty)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 6:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/31 "2002-06-30T06:54:47Z")

</div>

I stand corrected. :o Lajoie did indeed bat .426, an average never matched by Ty Cobb, George Sisler, Ted Williams, or anyone else in the AL; the closest approach was Rogers Hornsby in 1924 at .424.  
In the early 60s, when Hank Aaron looked like the best bet to bat .400, an article, apparently in Street & Smith’s _Baseball_ magazine was titled: “.400 Hitters don’t Win Pennants!” Not one 20th-Century .400 hitter was on a pennant club; in 1901 the White Sox, not the Philadelphia A’s, won the AL pennant; Hornsby’s 1924 St. Louis Cardinals finished 6th. George Sisler, of course, never got to be with a pennant winner–he was with the St. Louis Browns–who got their one and only AL pennant in 1944–although, admittedly, the Browns made a good run for the pennant in 1922.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brad\_d](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@brad\_d](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brad_d)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 8:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/32 "2002-06-30T08:11:29Z")

</div>

I was under the impression that the designated hitter can **only** bat in place of the pitcher - that the DH rule is carefully crafted to exclude the possibility of using him to bat for (say) the left fielder.

Actually, searching previous threads, zev and **BobT** answered it pretty definitively [here](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=41879), where the relevant rule was quoted. It’s long, and doesn’t seem to have a single sentence reading “the DH may only bat for the pitcher,” but that’s the upshot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fern\_Forest](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/71c47a/32.png) [@Fern\_Forest](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fern_Forest)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 9:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/33 "2002-06-30T09:41:33Z")

</div>

How many stats are there in baseball?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DAVEW0071](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e19b73/32.png) [@DAVEW0071](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DAVEW0071)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 11:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/34 "2002-06-30T11:53:17Z")

</div>

Someone probably has a statistic for that…  
:: d&r ::

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rackensack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e5b9ba/32.png) [@rackensack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rackensack)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/35 "2002-06-30T15:09:43Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by RickQ \*  
> \*\*Ok, thanks for the responses so far. That clears things up a bit. I don’t really know why the report errors, but I guess some people want to know this. Is that the way it has always been done?  
> \*\*

Yep, all the way back to the line scores of nineteenth-century games. The reason errors are reported as one of the main numbers about a game _now_ is that they always have been. The reason they always have been is that in the early days of baseball, errors were _much_ more common, and played a much bigger role in determining the outcome of games. In 1887, for example, the fielding percentage for every team in the National League was between .905 and .926 – meaning there was an error on one of every eight or nine balls put in play. The league champion Detroit Wolverines had the fewest errors at 384 in 124 games – an average of just over 3 errors per game.  
The worst-fielding team that year was the Boston Braves, with 522 errors and a .905 fielding percentage. The number of runs scored per team per game ranged from about 5.5 to over 7.5, but earned run averages (the number of runs allowed per nine innings that were not the result of an error) were about two runs per game lower: 3.46 to 5.24. In short, errors played a huge part in the game of those days, and the line scores reflected that. As the game changed, however, with better playing fields, the use of gloves and their increasing size, and a host of other factors, the number of errors steadily declined. Last year, the San Diego Padres had the most errors and lowest fielding percentage of any team in the NL, with 145 errors in 162 games (0.895 E/gm) and an FP of .976. They allowed slightly over 5 runs per game, with an ERA of 4.52 (a difference of about half a run, as opposed to the two run/game difference of the early days). Errors are a far less important stat in understanding the general nature of a specific game than they once were, but line scores continue to include them simply because they’ve always been there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dantheman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dantheman/32/9421_2.png) [@dantheman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dantheman)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 3:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/36 "2002-06-30T15:15:19Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by brad\_d \*  
> \*\*I was under the impression that the designated hitter can **only** bat in place of the pitcher - that the DH rule is carefully crafted to exclude the possibility of using him to bat for (say) the left fielder.
> 
> Actually, searching previous threads, zev and **BobT** answered it pretty definitively [here](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=41879), where the relevant rule was quoted. It’s long, and doesn’t seem to have a single sentence reading “the DH may only bat for the pitcher,” but that’s the upshot. \*\*

It might not state explicitly that the DH must bat in place of the pitcher, but the whole point of the DH was to keep the traditionally weak-hitting pitcher from batting. Theoretically, someone could have a crappy-hitting LF and have a DH for him (I don’t think it’s been tried, and one would assume the ump wouldn’t allow it), but then the pitcher would have to hit. And he’d have to be one hell of a hitting pitcher to bat instead of a left fielder.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zev\_steinhardt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/97f17d/32.png) [@zev\_steinhardt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zev_steinhardt)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/37 "2002-06-30T16:54:53Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by JohnBckWLD \*  
> \*\*  
> Your postings _appear_ to imply you’re on the pro-DH side of the fence. \*\*

To be honest, I’m neither here nor there on the matter. I enjoy watching the DH used in normal games. OTOH, whenever I play Out of the Park Baseball (a great game, BTW), I always set up my leagues without the DH.

Zev Steinhardt

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zev\_steinhardt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/97f17d/32.png) [@zev\_steinhardt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zev_steinhardt)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/38 "2002-06-30T16:57:22Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by PatrickM \*  
> \*\*  
> Zev, do both the Japanese major leagues use the DH now? I dimly recall that one of them didn’t use to allow the DH. \*\*

I have to admit that I don’t know.

In any event, the Japanese leagues are NOT part of Organized Baseball.

Zev Steinhardt

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dantheman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dantheman/32/9421_2.png) [@dantheman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dantheman)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/39 "2002-06-30T17:35:09Z")

</div>

Yes, they’re very disorganized! :\>

[OOTP rules. Do you have OOTP 4? I didn’t bother upgrading…]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cardinal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cardinal/32/4000_2.png) [@Cardinal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cardinal)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2002, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399/40 "2002-06-30T22:33:55Z")

</div>

RickQ - In case you’re still around, and care, you can steal almost any time you want, but it’s a good idea to wait until the pitcher’s motion to throw to the batter has started. What exactly constitutes that has started many an argument, but if he stops and doesn’t actually throw to the batter, it’s a “balk”, and the runner is awarded the next base anyway.

Another way to get a balk is for the pitcher to not stop his hands when in the “stretch”, which is what you’ll see them do whenever there’s a runner on first base. If they actually used a full windup then, even Frank Thomas would be a stealing threat.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baseball-fans-can-you-explain-some-stuff-to-me/116399.md?page=3)
