# BBC news online,  or is it the onion in disguise?!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [September 29, 2004, 5:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685 "2004-09-29T17:19:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 34

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2004, 7:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/661 "2004-10-08T19:35:49Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Your rage-colored glasses have completely warped your ability to understand even your own position, let alone others’.

What’s the color of “rage” anyway? 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2004, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/662 "2004-10-08T21:17:20Z")

</div>

> [@Lute Skywatcher](#):
>
> What’s the color of “rage” anyway? 😃

Puce.

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> This one? I hadn’t even gotten to the comments about being fooled at this point…

What the hell does “worthless fraud” mean, then?

**Candid** , you keep saying that education wouldn’t help you understand art. What I want to know is, have you ever actually _tried_ to educate yourself about art? If not, how do you know it wouldn’t “work” for you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 1:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/663 "2004-10-10T01:55:28Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> What the hell does “worthless fraud” mean, then?
> 
> **Candid** , you keep saying that education wouldn’t help you understand art. What I want to know is, have you ever actually _tried_ to educate yourself about art? If not, how do you know it wouldn’t “work” for you?

Well, let me give you a parallel example of ‘worthless fraud’ - professional wrestling. Particularly ten years ago, before they acknowledged the staging of the fights. Not every fan of pro wrestling at the time, believe or not, thought it was ‘real’.

So when I say abstract art is a worthless fraud, I am not implying that it’s fooling anyone. Now, in a later post, I did go on to assert that some people are fooling themselves based on art critic’s input, paying exorbitant amounts of money for works of ‘genius’. And I stand by that.

But the notion of ‘fooling’ has nothing to do with my first post.

As for the education angle - I didn’t say it wouldn’t help me **understand** art. I said it wouldn’t help me **appreciate** art. Let’s use the Icelandic analogy - I’m sure there are some interesting things out there written in Icelandic, but I really don’t need to pick up the language because people can say the same sorts of things in English, and I already get plenty of ideas I do appreciate in English. Why are the ones in Icelandic so special?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/664 "2004-10-10T01:58:14Z")

</div>

**Lobsang** , would you kindly ask for this thread to be closed, please?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 2:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/665 "2004-10-10T02:14:34Z")

</div>

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> Well, let me give you a parallel example of ‘worthless fraud’ - professional wrestling. Particularly ten years ago, before they acknowledged the staging of the fights. Not every fan of pro wrestling at the time, believe or not, thought it was ‘real’.
> 
> So when I say abstract art is a worthless fraud, I am not implying that it’s fooling anyone. Now, in a later post, I did go on to assert that some people are fooling themselves based on art critic’s input, paying exorbitant amounts of money for works of ‘genius’. And I stand by that.
> 
> But the notion of ‘fooling’ has nothing to do with my first post.

Uh-huh. So shall I just add the word “fraud” to the list of words you clearly don’t understand the meaning of?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/666 "2004-10-10T02:38:54Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Uh-huh. So shall I just add the word “fraud” to the list of words you clearly don’t understand the meaning of?

Just because something’s fake doesn’t mean that it if a successful fake. If you can’t grasp the distinction - well, it’s a pretty simple one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fessie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c37758/32.png) [@fessie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fessie)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/667 "2004-10-10T02:50:28Z")

</div>

to quote **furt** in the “Bush Mental Illness” thread:

Except for those who are literally mentally ill, nobody is so arrogant as to think they know everything or are always right. Everyone knows they are fallible; even a smug and arrogant person will allow there are some things he doesn’t know about.

The real test of one’s wisdom, grace and humility is exactly when you are faced with someone who disagrees with you on your deepest beliefs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ilsa\_Lund](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/a6a055/32.png) [@Ilsa\_Lund](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ilsa_Lund)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 2:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/668 "2004-10-10T02:53:22Z")

</div>

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> Why are the ones in Icelandic so special?

Try this: For purple mountains majesty. This has a very specific connotation, means something very definite and also has a deep significance for Americans who speak english (ignoring the generalizations about patriotism for a moment).

In spanish, it roughly translates to “Los montanas morado con majestad.”

Translated _back into english_, it means “purple coloured mountains with majesty.” This bears little resemblance to the intended idea, which in turn means nothing to a Spanish or Mexican person, because they don’t share that song as part of their cultural heritage. While “Vive le France!” or “God Save The Queen!” is just a catchphrase to an American, it is an important declaration of patriotism by a Frenchman or an Englishman.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Typo\_Negative](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/typo_negative/32/484_2.png) [@Typo\_Negative](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Typo_Negative)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 2:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/669 "2004-10-10T02:56:40Z")

</div>

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> Just because something’s fake doesn’t mean that it if a successful fake. .

are there words missing in this sentence? Or am I the only only one who doesn’t understand it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/670 "2004-10-10T03:16:04Z")

</div>

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> Just because something’s fake doesn’t mean that it if a successful fake. If you can’t grasp the distinction - well, it’s a pretty simple one.

And wether or not the fraud is succesful has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion. If you call all “abstract” (under whatever fucked up definition of that word you want to use) a “worthless fraud,” you are making a direct statement on both the intent of the artist and the gullibility of the audience. There is no way to use the term “fraud” that is not insulting to someone, and you used it in such a way as to insult everyone in this thread who has ever found anything of value in an abstract painting.

And then you started whining about how all the art snobs were being mean to you. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/671 "2004-10-10T18:52:55Z")

</div>

> [@Ilsa\_Lund](#):
>
> Try this: For purple mountains majesty. This has a very specific connotation, means something very definite and also has a deep significance for Americans who speak english (ignoring the generalizations about patriotism for a moment).
> 
> In spanish, it roughly translates to “Los montanas morado con majestad.”
> 
> Translated _back into english_, it means “purple coloured mountains with majesty.” This bears little resemblance to the intended idea, which in turn means nothing to a Spanish or Mexican person, because they don’t share that song as part of their cultural heritage. While “Vive le France!” or “God Save The Queen!” is just a catchphrase to an American, it is an important declaration of patriotism by a Frenchman or an Englishman.

Sorry - ‘purple mountains’ majesty’ doesn’t tug at the patriotic parts of my heartstrings.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 6:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/672 "2004-10-10T18:53:59Z")

</div>

> [@spooje](#):
>
> are there words missing in this sentence? Or am I the only only one who doesn’t understand it?

‘if’ should have been ‘is’ … it’s a typo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/673 "2004-10-10T19:00:32Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> And wether or not the fraud is succesful has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion. If you call all “abstract” (under whatever fucked up definition of that word you want to use) a “worthless fraud,” you are making a direct statement on both the intent of the artist and the gullibility of the audience. There is no way to use the term “fraud” that is not insulting to someone, and you used it in such a way as to insult everyone in this thread who has ever found anything of value in an abstract painting.

Whether the fraud was successful has everything to do with someone saying that I claimed “people were fooled” in my first post. I’ll explain it again for you. Someone can do something under false pretenses - trying to make people think they’re doing it for one reason, or with a certain methodology, when they are not. That would be a fraud. Its status as a fraud is not affected by how many people, if any, were fooled.

And **Lobsang** - I am sorry for my part of sidetracking your thread. Didn’t realize agreeing with you with a sarcastic quip in hand would lead to this run-on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobsang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobsang/32/4067_2.png) [@Lobsang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobsang)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/674 "2004-10-10T19:14:53Z")

</div>

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> And **Lobsang** - I am sorry for my part of sidetracking your thread. Didn’t realize agreeing with you with a sarcastic quip in hand would lead to this run-on.

It’s no problem.  
I have to be honest I haven’t read most of it now. I made my points earlier on and then it became just another thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ilsa\_Lund](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/a6a055/32.png) [@Ilsa\_Lund](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ilsa_Lund)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 7:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/675 "2004-10-10T19:20:50Z")

</div>

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> Sorry - ‘purple mountains’ majesty’ doesn’t tug at the patriotic parts of my heartstrings.

Frankly, I’m speechless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stpauler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9d8465/32.png) [@stpauler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/stpauler)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2004, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685/676 "2004-10-10T23:13:11Z")

</div>

Not to bring up the OP or anything… 😉 … but CBS’s Sunday Morning had a segment about the 4 year old artist on. It was pretty cute. The interviewer kept asking what the artist meant by certain parts or why she did it. She wasn’t giving up any secrets if she had any.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bbc-news-online-or-is-it-the-onion-in-disguise/266685.md?page=33)
