Beating the clock to poison the well?

Conveniently, between the time I posted that then and how I’m posting this now, the following example popped up:

Now, that’s maybe not a great example, since he goes on to specifically comment about a particular poster: “You’re on the latter side. So you’ll have to excuse me if many of the proposals on what to do about people who are either stupid or evil or both sound just a little bit condescending. It’s because they are. This isn’t a case where discourse is needed.” (He then adds – in case we missed it – a “The only question is, why would you self-identify into that group?”)

But that’s the sort of language I had in mind: a poster flatly declaring that folks who enthusiastically back a particular candidate are intellectually or morally bankrupt; are ‘stupid or evil’; and are to be treated as “complete retards”. If a remark like that comes in before a self-identified Trump backer posts, would it be reportable?