Hundreds, to thousands of tons of depleted uranium? PUH-LEASE! :rolleyes: As soon as I heard that, I turned her off.
Do any of you have any idea how many DU tank tounds would have to be fired to put hundreds to thousands of tons of depleted uranium into the air as a fine particulate dust?
A protracted U.S./NATO vs. USSR conventional war might; the war in Iraq did not.
I’ve handled 105mm and 120 mm DU rounds; they weigh in at about 40-45 pounds, with the weight fairly even distributed, perhaps very slightly “ass heavy.” The 105mm round’s ejecta is an aluminum shell casing weighing about 10 pounds; the 120mm round is almost entirely consumed, and ejects an “AFCAP” (after-cap) the size of a large ashtray or bowl.
The 120mm DU Sabot is a freakin’ rocket of a round compared to the 105mm, which is the reason we use it nowadays. The HEAT round weighs more (due to the explosive filler in the projectile), and is definitely nose heavy, but, to my knowledge, there’s no DU in the HEAT round.
So for the 120mm, I’d put the actual DU projectile at about 25 pounds, minimum, to 35 pounds, maximum (11.3 kg and 15.9 kg, respectively).
Assuming “hundreds of tons (metric)” is, at a minimum, 200 mt, there would have to be anywhere from 12,579 to 17,699 DU rounds fired.
For the “thousands of tons” claim, assuming even 1,000 mt of DU dust is in the air, would require 62,893 to 88,496 DU rounds to have been fired.
Making her claim even more improbable is the fact that not all of the mass of the DU munitions is converted. So you now have an “X-factor” multiplier to the number of rounds fired necessary to bring us the “hundreds to thousands of tons” of DU residue she claims.
Since that particular round (M829 “Silver Bullet”) is specifically (and almost exclusively) a tank-killer, I seriously doubt that we’ve seen anywhere near that kind of DU munitions expenditure in the Iraq War, especially since armor has devolved to a secondary to tertiary role in the peacekeeping process.