# Being a socialist in america

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [July 18, 2000, 10:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030 "2000-07-18T22:15:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Major\_Feelgud](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/3be4f8/32.png) [@Major\_Feelgud](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Major_Feelgud)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 6:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/21 "2000-07-19T06:48:56Z")

</div>

Oldscratch: “Socialists believe that the “state” is a tool used by a minority of people to oppress the majority.”

Wasn’t the old USSR, a supposed socialist state, the worst example of a minority of people oppressing the majority?

Face it, we wouldn’t need prisons if people didn’t commit crimes. What are you going to do, slap them on the wrist and return them to society?

Socialized medicine sucks. Look at UK and Canada.

Socialism is the refuge of lazy people and incompetents.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tracer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tracer/32/20578_2.png) [@tracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tracer)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 7:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/22 "2000-07-19T07:57:00Z")

</div>

Look, watery tarts distributin’ swords is no basis for a system o’ government! Supreme executive power has to come from a mandate of the people. If I went around saying I was king just because some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at me, they’d put me away!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 11:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/23 "2000-07-19T11:17:30Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Well, I know the conservatives are all for redistribution of wealth. They just want it all redistributed upwards.

And using whatever force necessary! 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gobear](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8dc957/32.png) [@gobear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gobear)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 11:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/24 "2000-07-19T11:51:09Z")

</div>

I believe it was the French President Clemenceau who commented on his son’s joining the Socialist Party:

> [@](#):
>
> If my son had not joined the Socialists when he was 20, I would have thought he had no heart.  
> If he is still a Socialist by the time he is 40, I will think he has no head. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Zambezi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7cd45c/32.png) [@Mr.Zambezi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Zambezi)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 2:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/25 "2000-07-19T14:27:22Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*\*If people fought for and won socialized health-care, they would get it that they could ight for and win other things. It would also implant in people’s mind that everyone is entitled to be provided with health care. That is a good idea.
> 
> The same goes for housing. Sure the UN resolution is stupid, but if people fight for that idea, they will come into conflict with the existing ideas of the day, it will expand their conciousness. Again a good thing.

\*\*

So **scratch** , if the people join together to give more and more of the peoples decision making, money and power to the government, they are going to be diminishing the power and control of the government? It seems to me that to diminish governmental power, we should all take back the money and decision making _from_ the government. You seem to be contradicting yourself.

Actually you are sounding more like **Libertarian** , who **still hasn’t told me what a hard break is**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 2:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/26 "2000-07-19T14:54:26Z")

</div>

[Groundskeeper Willie mode ON]

Ah **told** ye! Ah **warrrned** ye! But no, ye would na lissen ta me!

[Groundskeeper Willie mode OFF]

**oldscratch** , I’m all for solidarity but this great debates thread idea is asking for trouble. Not 'cos the whole vast majority of the Teeming Millions are a buncha rabid libertarian nutcases, but that this kind of thread ATTRACTS them quickly, it turns into an insult/screamfest, and people who are or may be genuinely curious about what we think avoid the thread like the plague.

I mean it. Go find people you can talk to face-to-face and let this thread die. You’ll save yourself much aggravation and headaches.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 3:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/27 "2000-07-19T15:10:05Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Actually you are sounding more like Libertarian, who still hasn’t told me what a hard break is.

I meant to say “horizontal rule”, not “hard break”.

[/quote]

like this

[/quote]

it could be useful

[/quote]

for separating portions of a post

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Zambezi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7cd45c/32.png) [@Mr.Zambezi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Zambezi)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/28 "2000-07-19T16:11:24Z")

</div>

Olentzero, you foul, malodorous, left wing scumbag. I disagree because you are wrong, Wrong, WRONG! What type of of brain dead…cough, cough, cough…

There, I feel better. Actually, I am really curious about scratch’s ideas. I figure that it will take at least three pages before I start ranting about people stealing my money. Actually, this board has been very tame lately and the denizens are pretty smart and rational.

BTW, what’s up with that? No SECRETAGENT, no Newton’s Apple…who killed all the trolls?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FreakFreely](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/48db29/32.png) [@FreakFreely](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FreakFreely)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 4:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/29 "2000-07-19T16:46:22Z")

</div>

Okay, here’s something I can disagree with you on **oldscratch**. You seem to have a tendency towards referring to the government as “them”, and talking about us fighting the government. The government isn’t an entity, the government is the balance of the majority. Much as I hate America, it **is** a democracy, and people can change the government, if you can get them to change their minds. Granted, at this point in time the companies and the richest 1% have too much control over our government. But we can change that. And from the looks of it, we are. The biggest step is to reform the hell out of campaign financing.

Besides, revolution is just plain stupid. The definition of a revolution is to go in a full circle and end up where you started. Except with less money, and more dead people.

I vote for less revolution and more evolution.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/30 "2000-07-19T16:57:52Z")

</div>

“Every revolution evaporates, and leaves behind the slime of a new bureaucracy.” — Franz Kafka

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FreakFreely](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/48db29/32.png) [@FreakFreely](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FreakFreely)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 5:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/31 "2000-07-19T17:08:14Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> A good example would be equal rights for religous minorites. Yes, I’m an atheist. I’m even anti-religious. I don’t believe people should be.

Whoa, how did I miss this? For the sake of this argument, I’ll assume you mean that in your ideal government, religion would be outlawed.

If you outlaw a religion, that religion will only burn brighter because now they have an enemy and a scapegoat, the government.

In short, religion will always exist so long as there are humans to believe in things. If you say you want to outlaw religion, you’re basically saying you want to outlaw human-nature.

Besides, I think Atheism is just the newest religion. To paraphrase what MysterEcks said, do you have any **proof** that there’s nothing out there?

> [@](#):
>
> You might make the case that I would support repressio of religion? No. I support struggle against the state and anything that brings people together.

The thing is, religion _does_ bring people together. And that’s one of the reasons religions are so prevalent. People use any reason to form a group. There’s never just one monkey.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tradesilicon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/439d5e/32.png) [@tradesilicon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tradesilicon)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 6:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/32 "2000-07-19T18:20:13Z")

</div>

oldscatch, I am truly impressed with some of the ideals you have expressed. Less Government Control and Regulation for one. How will this be accomplished within the framework of Socialism in the US? I do not hink (based on what you’ve posted in the past) that you are in fovor of anarchy, so how do Socialists in the US see this coming about?

I am completely opposed to the idea of a revolution, but I would still like to hear your idea of the ideal revolution taking place.

olentzero, scamper off into the woods, and play with the bunnies. Don’t come in here and suggest that no one is interested, just 'cause you got a mouthfull in your thread. There are those who want to hear the views, weather they agree or not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Zambezi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7cd45c/32.png) [@Mr.Zambezi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Zambezi)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 7:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/33 "2000-07-19T19:27:37Z")

</div>

Freak said

> [@](#):
>
> Granted, at this point in time the companies and the richest 1% have too much control over our government. But we can change that. And from the looks of it, we are. The biggest step is to reform the hell out of campaign financing.

If you eliminate soft money and PAC’s, how will people make their voices heard. Remember that some of these evil PAC’s are groups like the Sierra Club, Planned Parenthood, The NRA, MADD…All groups of individuals banding together to gain a say in government so that they can compete with the Rich and Big Business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FreakFreely](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/48db29/32.png) [@FreakFreely](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FreakFreely)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 7:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/34 "2000-07-19T19:37:37Z")

</div>

I never said eliminate. I said reform. Such as limiting how much an individual or a company can contribute.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Zambezi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7cd45c/32.png) [@Mr.Zambezi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Zambezi)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/35 "2000-07-19T20:02:04Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I never said eliminate. I said reform. Such as limiting how much an individual or a company can contribute.

they already do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FreakFreely](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/48db29/32.png) [@FreakFreely](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FreakFreely)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/36 "2000-07-19T20:40:36Z")

</div>

Wow! Really? You just totally blew me out of the water there Mr. Z! I guess you got me![/sarcasm]

Yeah, I know. So when I said reform, I meant that they had to be more limited.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Zambezi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7cd45c/32.png) [@Mr.Zambezi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Zambezi)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/37 "2000-07-19T21:02:24Z")

</div>

No problem Freak. I wasn’t in attack mode, just pointing out some finer points. anything more at this point is a hijack of poor scratch’s thread. Where the heck is he. He started this and then took off.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 9:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/38 "2000-07-19T21:22:46Z")

</div>

**Mr. Z.:**

> [@](#):
>
> If you eliminate soft money and PAC’s [from campaign financing], how will people make their voices heard. Remember that some of these evil PAC’s are groups like the Sierra Club, Planned Parenthood, The NRA, MADD…All groups of individuals banding together to gain a say in government so that they can compete with the Rich and Big Business.

If campaigns are publicly financed, all these PACs can still make their voices heard by appealing directly to the public, via advertising etc., to elect the candidate(s) they approve of. They just won’t have the candidates under direct financial obligations to them.

One prototype for such a process is the new [Maine Clean Election Act](http://www.iulaw.indy.indiana.edu/Programs/Law_State_Gov/symposium1e.htm):

> [@](#):
>
> By passing this bill, Maine became the first state in the union to enact legislation providing for publicly financed political campaigns.
> 
> Under the “Maine Clean Election Act,” certified candidates for the positions of Governor, State Senator and State Representative have the option of having their campaigns publicly financed. This applies to elections beginning in the year 2000 and continuing thereafter. […] After a candidate has been certified, he or she can no longer accept contributions in any amount and must finance the campaign solely from the Clean Election Act fund.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FreakFreely](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/48db29/32.png) [@FreakFreely](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FreakFreely)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 9:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/39 "2000-07-19T21:23:49Z")

</div>

Sorry about that, I’ve been in the pit a lot lately…

Maybe we should spend less time arguing over the finer points and get back to insulting his ideals. I mean, we gotta keep him busy, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Zambezi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7cd45c/32.png) [@Mr.Zambezi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Zambezi)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2000, 9:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030/40 "2000-07-19T21:36:50Z")

</div>

Well, we all know that socialism doesn’t work. But I want to hear how making the government responsible for universal healthcare and housing is going to lessen its power.

Kim said:

> [@](#):
>
> If campaigns are publicly financed, all these PACs can still make their voices heard by appealing directly to the public, via advertising etc., to elect the candidate(s) they approve of. They just won’t have the candidates under direct financial obligations to them.

Well, I think if the NRA spent $250 million on TV ads to get a senator elected, he would probably be pretty beholden to them. If I am not mistaken, the reformers are pretty miffed about PAC’s and Individuals paying for political adverts. Personally, I think outlawing them is an infringement of the 1st amendment.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/being-a-socialist-in-america/26030.md?page=3)
