# Belgium and Dutch competing for wind

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [May 28, 2025, 12:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905 "2025-05-28T12:21:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Love\_Rhombus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/love_rhombus/32/10694_2.png) [@Love\_Rhombus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Love_Rhombus)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2025, 12:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/1 "2025-05-28T12:21:02Z")

</div>

The headline here seems to be exaggerated, but it’s probably a real issue: there must be only so many optimal places for wind farms.

> **[Belgians accused of ‘stealing wind’ from the Dutch](https://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium/1595046/belgians-accused-of-stealing-wind-from-the-dutch)**
>
> A Dutch weather expert says Belgian wind farms have an important advantage over those of their Dutch neighbours.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2025, 1:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/2 "2025-05-28T13:24:00Z")

</div>

Placement doesn’t need to be “optimal” to be profitable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pardel-Lux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pardel-lux/32/20182_2.png) [@Pardel-Lux](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pardel-Lux)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2025, 1:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/3 "2025-05-28T13:34:07Z")

</div>

Nitpick: It is either Belgium and the Netherlands or Belgians and Dutch. I would favour the former.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2025, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/4 "2025-05-28T16:04:39Z")

</div>

“Let me make you a present of song as the Belgians steal wind and are gone. While Dutchmen with windmills are grinding their teeth and the nursery rhyme winds along”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2025, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/5 "2025-05-28T21:08:54Z")

</div>

I agree. I would find “Belgium and Holland” acceptable because in English (American English, at least), Holland is a metonym for The Netherlands.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jegpeg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f475e1/32.png) [@Jegpeg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jegpeg)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2025, 10:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/6 "2025-05-28T22:46:21Z")

</div>

Is that the case or is it just ignorance?  
At least technically “Holland” consists of two regions of the Netherlands (which happens to be where most of the population live).  
A lot of Brits, especially the Scots and Welsh get upset when people (usually Americans) refer to England and Britain as metonyms. I would not be surprised if it is the same wih the Dutch if someone refers to “Holland” but actually means “The Netherlands”  
[![](https://i.insider.com/5e1653343ac0c907a2297e70?width=800&format=jpeg&auto=webp) ](https://i.insider.com/5e1653343ac0c907a2297e70?width=800&format=jpeg&auto=webp)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 12:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/7 "2025-05-29T00:51:04Z")

</div>

There is no question that Americans use it that way. Whether it is a metonym or plain ignorance is not clear. Recall that Wagner seemed to use it that way.

I’ve never understood why Belgium even exists. Half of it should be in the Netherlands and half in France.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 4:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/8 "2025-05-29T04:17:58Z")

</div>

> [@Hari\_Seldon](#):
>
> I’ve never understood why Belgium even exists. Half of it should be in the Netherlands and half in France.

It was created as the neutral zone between two powers. Which is why it was so significant the Germany went through it in WWI.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 4:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/9 "2025-05-29T04:31:50Z")

</div>

> [@Hari\_Seldon](#):
>
> I’ve never understood why Belgium even exists.

> _The reason the [Earth](https://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/guide/earth.shtml) has been shunned for so long is also due to a language problem. On Earth, Belgium refers to a small country. Throughout the rest of the galaxy, Belgium is the most unspeakably rude word there is._ - [The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy](https://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/guide/belgium.shtml)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thelurkinghorror](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7c8e57/32.png) [@thelurkinghorror](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thelurkinghorror)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 5:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/10 "2025-05-29T05:36:50Z")

</div>

> [@Jegpeg](#):
>
> Is that the case or is it just ignorance?  
> At least technically “Holland” consists of two regions of the Netherlands (which happens to be where most of the population live).  
> A lot of Brits, especially the Scots and Welsh get upset when people (usually Americans) refer to England and Britain as metonyms. I would not be surprised if it is the same wih the Dutch if someone refers to “Holland” but actually means “The Netherlands”

It’s not just America, tons of places both English-speaking and not use a term equivalent to “Holland” for Netherlands or e.g. in Japanese the normal word for UK comes from England. It’s an example of [synecdoche](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synecdoche).

Northern Ireland unionists/loyalists like to be called “British” even though they’re the only ones to not live on the island of Britain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UDS1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/e47774/32.png) [@UDS1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS1)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 6:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/11 "2025-05-29T06:38:11Z")

</div>

“Britain” is frequently uses as a synonym for the United Kingdom, and “America” for the USA, so it’s not as though “Holland” for the Netherlands is without precedent.

Indeed, you could argue that “the Netherlands” is itself another example, since the country of that name includes only a part of the Low Countries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickLondon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/patricklondon/32/4422_2.png) [@PatrickLondon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickLondon)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 7:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/12 "2025-05-29T07:28:39Z")

</div>

> [@Melbourne](#):
>
> > [@Hari\_Seldon](#):
> >
> > I’ve never understood why Belgium even exists. Half of it should be in the Netherlands and half in France.
> 
> It was created as the neutral zone between two powers.

Indeed, going right back - wars of the Spanish and Austrian Successions (or rather, France vs. Everyone Else). Such that it got the nickname “The Cockpit of Europe”.

And virtually no-one who actually lives there wants to become Dutch or French.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 10:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/13 "2025-05-29T10:28:36Z")

</div>

> [@PatrickLondon](#):
>
> And virtually no-one who actually lives there wants to become Dutch or French.

Now when I think of Belgium, it’s not gin/beer, Jacques Brel, Front 242, Tintin, or Manneken Pis that first come to mind, it is that they are the baddest of asses in all of Europe according to Caesar, which is why comments like this

> [@Hari\_Seldon](#):
>
> I’ve never understood why Belgium even exists.

> [@Melbourne](#):
>
> Which is why it was so significant the Germany went through it in WWI.

make me sad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 11:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/14 "2025-05-29T11:53:34Z")

</div>

> [@DPRK](#):
>
> it is that they are the baddest of asses in all of Europe according to Caesar, which is why comments like this  
> …  
> make me sad.

Caesar was a long time ago. Perhaps they’ve gone soft. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 12:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/15 "2025-05-29T12:01:22Z")

</div>

Um … to actually get back to the question posed in the OT, the headline as posted is absurd. There is a massive amount of moving air, and only a teeny-tiny amount of it passes through the blades of the windmills. To imply that Belgium is somehow detracting from the wind power of the Netherlands is ridiculous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jegpeg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f475e1/32.png) [@Jegpeg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jegpeg)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2025, 3:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/belgium-and-dutch-competing-for-wind/1018905/16 "2025-05-29T15:06:24Z")

</div>

Wind shadow is a real thing, turbine placement make a huge difference in the output of a wind farm. The further you are “behind” the other wind farm the the less the effect so can still be significant.

The article claims Dutch wind farms would generate 3% more if there were no wind farms in Belgian waters and I would need concrete evidence to show that is not the case it seems reasonable to me.
