# Benghazi- give up the faux scandal already. It didn't work.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 12, 2012, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825 "2012-11-12T20:57:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lightnin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lightnin/32/180_2.png) [@Lightnin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lightnin)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/41 "2012-11-13T17:06:06Z")

</div>

> [@Engineer\_Dude](#):
>
> I hope people are serious about spelling it correctly, and not just paying lip service.

Pussy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b2d939/32.png) [@Dob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dob)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 5:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/42 "2012-11-13T17:33:36Z")

</div>

tangentially… I noticed Fox doesn’t have its “Media Bias” column on the front page of its website anymore. Wonder if the bias is now gone, or that attempting to point it out proved worthless in winning the election so the just stopped?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/43 "2012-11-13T17:53:22Z")

</div>

I’m not on board with the OP. I don’t think the administration did anything wrong (“they had a plane in Italy so they could have saved everyone in the embassy” is not a compelling argument) but it has yet to be explained to my satisfaction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JQPublic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ac8455/32.png) [@JQPublic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JQPublic)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 6:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/44 "2012-11-13T18:51:25Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> I’m not on board with the OP. I don’t think the administration did anything wrong (“they had a plane in Italy so they could have saved everyone in the embassy” is not a compelling argument) but it has yet to be explained to my satisfaction.

I have to agree. Shit happens and crazy people do crazy things. I’m not really sure what, if anything, can-could-or should be done to prevent something like this in the future. But for weeks to blame a youtube video is sort of insulting even to my admittedly questionable intelligence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hentor_the_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 7:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/45 "2012-11-13T19:31:33Z")

</div>

> [@JQPublic](#):
>
> I have to agree. Shit happens and crazy people do crazy things. I’m not really sure what, if anything, can-could-or should be done to prevent something like this in the future. But for weeks to blame a youtube video is sort of insulting even to my admittedly questionable intelligence.

Can you give a “for instance” on the blaming it on a video for weeks?

This is of course independent of the “so.what” question.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Astral\_Rejection](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/258eb7/32.png) [@Astral\_Rejection](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Astral_Rejection)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 7:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/46 "2012-11-13T19:33:41Z")

</div>

I seem to remember a terrorist group themselves claiming it was because of the video, which would certainly confuse the issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 7:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/47 "2012-11-13T19:43:45Z")

</div>

The CIA seems to have vacillated on to what degree the attack was an opportunistic one triggered by the previous riots in Cairo and to what degree it was a preplanned one. But I don’t think they ever “blamed it on the video”. Here’s President Obama, only 14 hours after the attack:

> [@](#):
>
> “You’re right that this is not a situation that was exactly the same as what happened in Egypt,” Obama said, referring to protests sparked by an anti-Islam film. “And my suspicion is that there are folks involved in this who were looking to target Americans from the start.”

In any case, its hardly a scandal. Figuring out the exactly what happened in an attack on the other side of the world in a country that just underwent a Civil War is always going to take some doing. I haven’t really seen any evidence the CIA did particularly badly in investigating or communicating what they found.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeriel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/58956e/32.png) [@Zeriel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeriel)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/48 "2012-11-13T20:36:43Z")

</div>

My personal opinion is the same as it usually is when it comes to these kinds of fake “scandals”.

Show me a motive that actually makes a single God-damned lick of sense. In other words, show me a motive that doesn’t require Obama and Hilary and who the fuck ever else to be secret anti-America conspirators in some sort of shadowy plot to destroy the country.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JQPublic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ac8455/32.png) [@JQPublic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JQPublic)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 8:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/49 "2012-11-13T20:44:20Z")

</div>

> [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](#):
>
> Can you give a “for instance” on the blaming it on a video for weeks?
> 
> This is of course independent of the “so.what” question.

Even though you don’t really care;  
September 12 – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:

"We are working to determine the precise motivations and methods of those who carried out this assault. Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.

September 13 – Jay Carney:

“The protests we’re seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie. They are not directly in reaction to any policy of the United States or the government of the United States or the people of the United States.”

September 13 – State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland:

So I know that’s going to be frustrating for you, but we really want to make sure that we do this right and we don’t jump to conclusions. That said, obviously, there are plenty of people around the region citing this disgusting video as something that has been motivating."

September 16 – Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, on CNN’s “State of the Union” with Candy Crowley:

“There was a hateful video that was disseminated on the Internet. It had nothing to do with the United States government, and it’s one that we find disgusting and reprehensible. It’s been offensive to many, many people around the world. That sparked violence in various parts of the world, including violence directed against Western facilities including our embassies and consulates.”

\*\*September 20 – President Obama at a town hall meeting organized by the Spanish-language Univision Network, responding to a question about the possible involvement of al Qaeda:

“What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”\*\*

It wasn’t until;  
September 21 – Hillary Clinton:

“What happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and we will not rest until we have tracked down and brought to justice the terrorists who murdered four Americans.”

So OK it wasn’t two weeks, only nine days of claiming it was a video

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pseudotriton\_ruber\_ruber](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a9a28c/32.png) [@pseudotriton\_ruber\_ruber](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pseudotriton_ruber_ruber)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 8:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/50 "2012-11-13T20:51:08Z")

</div>

OMG! Government takes almost 9 days to decide the motivations of foriegn attackers! Coverup! Scandal! pants-peeing for all!!!

Get a fucking life, would you, already?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Llama\_Llogophile](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@Llama\_Llogophile](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Llama_Llogophile)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/51 "2012-11-13T20:55:12Z")

</div>

Something chaotic happened in a chaotic country that only recently underwent a lot of chaos…

And the problem is that we didn’t know precisely what happened instantly? Pull the other one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jackdavinci](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackdavinci/32/3259_2.png) [@jackdavinci](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jackdavinci)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/52 "2012-11-13T20:58:49Z")

</div>

There seems to be some kind of false dichotomy where people are getting confused and thinking either it’s the video or it isn’t. But it was both. When the various spokespeople were talking about the embassy attacks, they were talking about them all together because they seemed related. Benghazi turned out to be an attack that wasn’t part of the other protests. But the other embassy attacks were in protests, and related to the video.

People are acting like all the White House reports were talking exclusively about Benghazi, when really they were talking about all the embassy incidences together.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JQPublic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ac8455/32.png) [@JQPublic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JQPublic)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/53 "2012-11-13T20:59:22Z")

</div>

> [@pseudotriton\_ruber\_ruber](#):
>
> OMG! Government takes almost 9 days to decide the motivations of foriegn attackers! Coverup! Scandal! pants-peeing for all!!!
> 
> Get a fucking life, would you, already?

WOW, Pretty intellectual response.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/54 "2012-11-13T21:05:09Z")

</div>

While the US gov’t probably did over-emphasize the roll of anti-video protests early on, they weren’t wrong in saying the attackers were, at least partially, [motivated](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/world/africa/election-year-stakes-overshadow-nuances-of-benghazi-investigation.html?ref=todayspaper&pagewanted=all) by anger over the video.

> [@](#):
>
> To those on the ground, the circumstances of the attack are hardly a mystery. Most of the attackers made no effort to hide their faces or identities, and during the assault some acknowledged to a Libyan journalist working for The New York Times that they belonged to the group. And their attack drew a crowd, some of whom cheered them on, some of whom just gawked, and some of whom later looted the compound.
> 
> The fighters said at the time that they were moved to act because of the video, which had first gained attention across the region after a protest in Egypt that day. The assailants approvingly recalled a 2006 assault by local Islamists that had destroyed an Italian diplomatic mission in Benghazi over a perceived insult to the prophet. In June the group staged a similar attack against the Tunisian Consulate over a different film, according to the Congressional testimony of the American security chief at the time, Eric A. Nordstrom.

The main misunderstanding early on wasn’t that the US thought the attacks were due to anger regarding the video (they were) but that the attackers were part of a larger protest. The CIA’s original assessment apparently thought there was a less violent protest prior to the attacks, but they stressed those early statements were only perlimanary and walked them back pretty quickly.

Its pretty thin gruel to try and make a “scandal” out of.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 9:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/55 "2012-11-13T21:11:48Z")

</div>

Why the consulate, if these bad mofos wanted to show how bad they are, why not the actual embassy? Why was Amb. Stevens there, rather than at the Embassy? If the attack was targeted on him, when did anyone know he was going to be there? What kind of super sophisticated smart terrorist brag about shit on cell phones, when they could just whisper into the CIA’s ear?

These are a bunch of interesting questions no one seems interested in but me. Seems to me the reason these questions go begging is that the answers have no obvious political advantage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pseudotriton\_ruber\_ruber](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a9a28c/32.png) [@pseudotriton\_ruber\_ruber](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pseudotriton_ruber_ruber)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/56 "2012-11-13T21:17:28Z")

</div>

> [@JQPublic](#):
>
> WOW, Pretty intellectual response.

Compared to pants-peeing? You betcha!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/57 "2012-11-13T21:24:54Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> Why the consulate, if these bad mofos wanted to show how bad they are, why not the actual embassy? Why was Amb. Stevens there, rather than at the Embassy? If the attack was targeted on him, when did anyone know he was going to be there?

Seems it was an [opportunistic attack](http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-evidence-doesnt-show-planning-in-libyan-attack/2012/10/19/ff7ff326-1a36-11e2-bd10-5ff056538b7c_story.html) triggered by the protests in Egypt. So presumably they attacked the Consolute because it was nearby wherever militant Islamists hang out when they’re not attacking things. Not because they knew Stevens was there, or because that target was more preferable to others in the country.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/58 "2012-11-13T21:50:59Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> Why the consulate, if these bad mofos wanted to show how bad they are, why not the actual embassy?

Um, because they knew that’s where the CIA base was?

> [@](#):
>
> Why was Amb. Stevens there, rather than at the Embassy?

Because that’s where the governing body of Libya is? Remember, that’s where the revolution started, and that’s where the people who ran it were from.

> [@](#):
>
> If the attack was targeted on him

It might not have been.

> [@](#):
>
> These are a bunch of interesting questions no one seems interested in but me. Seems to me the reason these questions go begging is that the answers have no obvious political advantage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clarisse\_McClellan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f0a364/32.png) [@Clarisse\_McClellan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clarisse_McClellan)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/59 "2012-11-13T22:31:16Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> Why the consulate, if these bad mofos wanted to show how bad they are, why not the actual embassy? Why was Amb. Stevens there, rather than at the Embassy? If the attack was targeted on him, when did anyone know he was going to be there? What kind of super sophisticated smart terrorist brag about shit on cell phones, when they could just whisper into the CIA’s ear?
> 
> These are a bunch of interesting questions no one seems interested in but me. Seems to me the reason these questions go begging is that the answers have no obvious political advantage.

I have read various places that Amb. Stevens was not at the consulate but went there after getting reports of violent protests, in order to help evacuate it:

> **[Officials: U.S. Ambassador To Libya, And 3 Other Embassy Staffers Killed In...](https://www.huffpost.com/entry/j-christopher-stevens-ambassador-to-libya-killed_n_1876544)**
>
> Officials: U.S. Ambassador To Libya, And 3 Other Embassy Staffers Killed In Attack

ttp://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2012/09/libya-ambassador.html

[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/12/us-ambassador-to-libya-and-3-embassy-staff-members-reportedly-killed-in-libya/](http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/12/us-ambassador-to-libya-and-3-embassy-staff-members-reportedly-killed-in-libya/)

It seems clear he was not a pre-attack target in any way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2012, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825/60 "2012-11-13T23:01:23Z")

</div>

Well, yeah, but there’s some questions that raises as well. For instance, we told, IIRC, that there were no protests of any real impact going on prior to the attack. This is what gives any sort of substance to the suspicions of cover-up, saying that the attack grew out of an ongoing protest or that protest was used as a “screen”. At any rate, Triploli and the Embassy are at a considerable distance from Benghazi, and Tripoli is where the Amb. “serves”. So a phrasing that suggests Stevens went to the consulate to help out with evacuation brings up the question: from where?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/benghazi-give-up-the-faux-scandal-already-it-didnt-work/640825.md?page=4)
