# Bernie and Jane Sanders under investigation for bank fraud

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [June 24, 2017, 7:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781 "2017-06-24T19:01:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2017, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/21 "2017-06-27T17:18:56Z")

</div>

> [@Lord\_Feldon](#):
>
> I wonder if she ever figured out where she put the tax returns.

I have to say that was rather suspicious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boffking](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/858c86/32.png) [@boffking](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/boffking)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2017, 5:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/22 "2017-06-27T17:41:14Z")

</div>

Is there any evidence that Bernie was personally involved in whatever happened at Burlington College? I do not believe in punishing someone for the actions of their spouse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2017, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/23 "2017-06-27T18:14:03Z")

</div>

> [@boffking](#):
>
> Is there any evidence that Bernie was personally involved in whatever happened at Burlington College? I do not believe in punishing someone for the actions of their spouse.

Bernie could have got a copy of his tax return and released it.

and yes:“… allegations that the senator’s wife, Jane Sanders, had committed fraud in obtaining bank loans for the now defunct Burlington College, and that Sanders’s Senate office had weighed in.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Davebd1985](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/3ab097/32.png) [@Davebd1985](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Davebd1985)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2017, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/24 "2017-06-27T18:27:57Z")

</div>

Allegations, there is no evidence; this is most likely slander. Just wait till the conclusion when nothing happens, typical. I’m sure every republican board will have blaring headlines stating " BERNIE ON THE FENCE, FRAUD, BIGLY, MAGA, PEDE, " very informative stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2017, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/25 "2017-06-27T18:38:31Z")

</div>

> [@boffking](#):
>
> Is there any evidence that Bernie was personally involved in whatever happened at Burlington College? I do not believe in punishing someone for the actions of their spouse.

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Bernie could have got a copy of his tax return and released it.
> 
> and yes:“… allegations that the senator’s wife, Jane Sanders, had committed fraud in obtaining bank loans for the now defunct Burlington College, and that Sanders’s Senate office had weighed in.”

There is no evidence, other than the unsupported allegation by the author of the link in the OP, that Bernie is part of this investigation. If it can be verified that he is under investigation, we can safely assume there is some evidence that he was involved. Until then, it’s just speculation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2017, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/26 "2017-06-27T18:58:42Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Bernie could have got a copy of his tax return and released it.

I thought you can’t do that if you’re under investigation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2017, 9:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/27 "2017-06-27T21:38:55Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> There is no evidence, other than the unsupported allegation by the author of the link in the OP, that Bernie is part of this investigation. If it can be verified that he is under investigation, we can safely assume there is some evidence that he was involved. Until then, it’s just speculation.

I’m not sure if this counts, but [Sanders and his wife have hired separate lawyers](http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-fbi-investigation-for-bank-fraud-hire-lawyers/). This obviously doesn’t prove that he’s guilty of anything, and doesn’t even prove that he’s under investigation. But it suggests that he might be under investigation or thinks he might shortly become so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2017, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/28 "2017-06-27T23:08:22Z")

</div>

I would think they would hire separate lawyers because they have very different issues to worry about in addition that the optics might be even worse with a shared lawyer. It would officially wrap her shenanigans on the loan application with the accusations that he attempted to influence the bank’s decision.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Feldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lord_feldon/32/341_2.png) [@Lord\_Feldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Feldon)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 12:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/29 "2017-06-28T00:13:28Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> I have to say that was rather suspicious.

I waffled back and forth on whether I believed that Bernie believed her excuse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 12:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/30 "2017-06-28T00:15:27Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> I would think they would hire separate lawyers because they have very different issues to worry about in addition that the optics might be even worse with a shared lawyer. It would officially wrap her shenanigans on the loan application with the accusations that he attempted to influence the bank’s decision.

Of course. If he needs a lawyer altogether, he needs a separate lawyer. My point in writing “separate” was that he hired his own lawyer, which indicates that he at least suspects that he might himself be under investigation, and it’s not just his wife’s lawyer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/31 "2017-06-28T00:16:23Z")

</div>

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> I thought you can’t do that if you’re under investigation.

Audit. Can’t do it if you’re under audit. If you are also under _investigation_, that’s Double Secret Prohibition.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 12:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/32 "2017-06-28T00:35:56Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> I’m not sure if this counts, but [Sanders and his wife have hired separate lawyers](http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-fbi-investigation-for-bank-fraud-hire-lawyers/). This obviously doesn’t prove that he’s guilty of anything, and doesn’t even prove that he’s under investigation. But it suggests that he might be under investigation or thinks he might shortly become so.

No, I can’t see how that that would count as evidence that he’s under investigation. It might be that unless someone at the FBI leaks it to the press, we simply won’t know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Backwater\_Under\_Duck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ba8739/32.png) [@Backwater\_Under\_Duck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Backwater_Under_Duck)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 1:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/33 "2017-06-28T01:38:47Z")

</div>

Hard left Lib here. Personally I’m thrilled with this. Anything to keep this guy from running again and ensuring a full 8 years of Trump works for me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 3:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/34 "2017-06-28T03:10:44Z")

</div>

> [@Backwater\_Under\_Duck](#):
>
> Hard left Lib here. Personally I’m thrilled with this. Anything to keep this guy from running again and ensuring a full 8 years of Trump works for me.

He’ll be 78 years old. He’s not running again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evan\_Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b487fb/32.png) [@Evan\_Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evan_Drake)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 4:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/35 "2017-06-28T04:13:43Z")

</div>

And he didn’t run last time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Superdude](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/superdude/32/13450_2.png) [@Superdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Superdude)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 4:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/36 "2017-06-28T04:59:38Z")

</div>

> [@Backwater\_Under\_Duck](#):
>
> Hard left Lib here. Personally I’m thrilled with this. Anything to keep this guy from running again and ensuring a full 8 years of Trump works for me.

I have to wonder why a “hard left Lib” would _want_ eight years of Trump.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Anconia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@D\_Anconia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Anconia)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 5:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/37 "2017-06-28T05:26:29Z")

</div>

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> I thought you can’t do that if you’re under investigation.

Why on earth would you think that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 5:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/38 "2017-06-28T05:44:55Z")

</div>

Psst, they’re making fun of Trump’s excuses for hiding his tax returns.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Anconia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@D\_Anconia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Anconia)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 5:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/39 "2017-06-28T05:51:10Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> Psst, they’re making fun of Trump’s excuses for hiding his tax returns.

Yeah, I figured that out after I posted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2017, 12:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781/40 "2017-06-28T12:31:41Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> If you are also under _investigation_, that’s Double Secret Prohibition.

If you’re a Democrat, it even disqualifies you from office. The Man Himself said so.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-investigation-for-bank-fraud/789781.md?page=3)
