First - thanks to those that like the list - stuff like this can be both silly and difficult - silly because guitar playing is art, dammit, but difficult because making choices involves a critical review of what we think is important and applying that. Ultimately, it is merely an exercise to see if we like the results, but the playing itself and the songs are what truly matter, right?
Second - regarding Folk types - I agree, having one or more categories for finger pickers would be key - Keb Mo is great today along with all of the older folkies and country blues players - jeez, Leo Kottke, anyone? My point with the categories is that, once a set of criteria for Greatness [sup][TM[/sup] is established, a number of “splinter” groups break off that are vital and important in their own right. But the groups overlap and conflict and stretch on into infinity so I just listed some ones that seemed “obvious” to me…
Third - EVH in the pantheon with Jimi and Clapton. You know, I wrote a TON about that in my original post and then deleted it. Ya gotta understand - EVH was the biggest influence on me when I was really getting into guitar (after Jeff Beck, but he was before my time, whereas EVH was The Man in the early '80’s. So, Bomzaway and Spooje, you aren’t going to hear me fighting real hard to knock him down a notch. Having said that - let me ask a couple of questions:
-
are guitarists the world over still playing a ton of tapping and hammering riffs? How about that compared to blues-infected rock, blues with more complex chords, and rhythm-and-lead work? Hendrix was the guy who blew open using more complex chords and using partial rhythm chords while playing lead lines to be both rhythm and lead at once; Clapton did this too and really was a leader in the blues-inflected rock area. EVH pushed this forward, but his true innovations feel (to me, mind you) like they were more of his era - I don’t know that his techniques have much resonance outside of the 80’s. During the 80’s they were practically the only thing that mattered; now, they are respected, and you see them a little, but its not like they are woven as deeply into the fabric of music as Clapton’s and Hendrix’ influences. YMMV - this is not black and white, but a question of degrees.
-
Name Van Halen’s most “important” song…I am inclined to say “Eruption” for turning guitar playing on its ear or “Dance the Night Away” for making Hard Rock/Power Pop cross over on the radio. Have they ever said anything of substance in their songs? Believe me, its okay to be a good Power Pop band - I love VH. But compare that to “The Wind Cries Mary”, “The Star Spangled Banner” or any number of Hendrix’ other songs, or “Tales of Brave Ulysses” or the cover of “Hideaway” (the 60’s version of “Eruption” by the way) or Clapton’s solo stuff - including “Tears in Heaven” - you may not like all of the songs as guitar hero tunes, but there is an attempt to really say something more resonant. Sure they did party tunes as well, but there is more…artistic intent? gravity? whatever you call it, in the songs.
Ultimately it feels like, to me, that EVH was THE most influential guitarist of his era, but ultimately is not as long-term influential as Hendrix and Clapton, which is why I put him one notch below them. Again, YMMV, and I am not going to fight this one very hard.