# Better Call Saul: Season IV

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [July 30, 2018, 4:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792 "2018-07-30T04:48:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 48

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 1:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/943 "2018-09-29T13:16:25Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> How about, “Ms Big Shot lawyer, is going the extra mile to help her current bed warmer’s associate, and at the same time giving her young lawyers some additional experience”? That’s far more of a reasonable understanding.

The DA doesn’t seem to know about Kim and Jimmy’s relationship, since she casually trashed Jimmy to Kim. I imagine if she _did_, she might suspect shenanigans, but as far as I can tell Kim has a clear local reputation and has just taken a partnership at an established firm so accusing Kim of anything without solid (or indeed, any) evidence is likely to create more problems for the DA than it solves.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/944 "2018-09-29T13:25:53Z")

</div>

> [@BlankSlate](#):
>
> Zafiro Añejo, I believe. The same fictional, rare and expensive brand of tequila that Gus gave to Don Eladio in BB.

Heh, on investigation, I was amused to learn the “sucker” was an established character, [“Ken”](http://breakingbad.wikia.com/wiki/Ken), who years after being conned by Kim and Jimmy would have a run-in with Walt.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marvin\_the\_Martian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/marvin_the_martian/32/2898_2.png) [@Marvin\_the\_Martian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marvin_the_Martian)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 2:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/945 "2018-09-29T14:14:30Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> As for her digging deeper., well remember, we have God’s eye view. She doesn’t. Sure, the use of a high powered lawyer and big firm associates raises an eyebrow, but there are other explanations than, “engineered scam”. How about, “Ms Big Shot lawyer, is going the extra mile to help her current bed warmer’s associate, and at the same time giving her young lawyers some additional experience”? That’s far more of a reasonable understanding.

I think the $6K “raised” on the fundraising page explains the high priced lawyers. I retract what i said about the ADA knowing she was being scammed, now I think the look of bemusement on her face while talking to Reverend Jimmy and watching the church website was due to realizing where the funding was coming from.

> [@AK84](#):
>
> And, no it’s not realistic that she couldn’t just call and find out from Louisiana Police and the local District Attorney or the IRS.

I still think they used (or could have used) a real church that didn’t have a web site.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrForrester](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/8edcca/32.png) [@DrForrester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrForrester)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 2:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/946 "2018-09-29T14:29:33Z")

</div>

One reason that Kim’s scam worked so well is the reason that many magic tricks work so well. People want to believe the simplest explanation, even when that explanation is clearly not possible.

Imagine I want a card trick in which a cockroach appears at just the right moment. A magician might very well consult with an entomologist about what sort of cockroach to use, where to get one, how to care for one, how to handle one, and so forth. The magician might take the time to arrange the cards in the deck, have multiple decks, have a non-regular deck, and so forth. The only thing that the witness sees is cards doing things that they shouldn’t and _wow_ a cockroach! The witness will see none of the preparation - even knowing ahead of time that it’s a magic trick. Give the witness an afternoon with the props for a careful inspection and a video of the trick being performed… The witness might form some ideas about how it was done.

In the case of Kim’s scam, there was a big reveal - the bags of letters - but, very quickly, life had to move on. There was no long afternoon to spend wondering. Make a deal. Next case, please.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MaxTheVool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@MaxTheVool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MaxTheVool)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/947 "2018-09-29T14:31:56Z")

</div>

> [@TruCelt](#):
>
> Picture: A back room at Saul’s office. One we’ve never seen before, with mahogany fixtures and understated oriental carpet. Kim is behind the desk, looking grim.
> 
> Saul: (shaken) I think this guy Walt is into some pretty serious shit. Like I think he’s messing with the Cartel!! We gotta get out of this, who can I refer him to?
> 
> Kim: (undeterred) Cartel money could get me my horse at last. Stay involved, but push for a contact to negotiate with.
> 
> Saul: (trembling) No! Please, honey, we’re in over our heads here!
> 
> Kim: (gleeful) Over your head, maybe, I’m just getting started. Bwaaaa ha ha haaa! Now send Man Mountain to deal with that ADA. She looked at me wrong in court today!

I’m 80% sure that would be the worst thing ever and completely ruin Breaking Bad in retrospect… but in the other 20% it would be the most audacious and brilliant gambit in the history of American pop culture.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/7ea924/32.png) [@zoog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoog)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/948 "2018-09-29T15:45:13Z")

</div>

> [@MaxTheVool](#):
>
> I’m 80% sure that would be the worst thing ever and completely ruin Breaking Bad in retrospect… but in the other 20% it would be the most audacious and brilliant gambit in the history of American pop culture.

I’m 100% sure it would result in me throwing something at my television in anger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrCube](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a3d4f5/32.png) [@DrCube](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrCube)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/949 "2018-09-29T16:42:55Z")

</div>

> [@BlankSlate](#):
>
> Zafiro Añejo, I believe. The same fictional, rare and expensive brand of tequila that Gus gave to Don Eladio in BB.

> [@](#):
>
> It was created after attempts to find a product placement fell through after being told that the scene contained people dropping dead minutes after drinking their placed product. The word zafiro is Spanish for sapphire and is a reference to the blue color of Walter White’s meth.

> **[Zafiro Añejo](https://breakingbad.fandom.com/wiki/Zafiro_A%C3%B1ejo)**
>
> Zafiro Añejo is a fictitious brand of tequila and distilled beverage created for 'Breaking Bad' and 'Better Call Saul'. Zafiro Añejo is a fictitious brand of tequila created by the writers of Breaking Bad with the word zafiro being Spanish for...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 11:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/950 "2018-09-29T23:46:27Z")

</div>

> [@Marvin\_the\_Martian](#):
>
> The showrunners will reissue the Breaking Bad episode where Gus poisons the cartel leadership and digitally insert Lalo (or put his head on one of the extras in the background). **They can ask Lucas for advice**.

Bad idea. He’ll alter it so that the cartel poisons first.

emphasis mine

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![soonerblue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/soonerblue/32/3302_2.png) [@soonerblue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/soonerblue)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 12:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/951 "2018-09-30T12:49:00Z")

</div>

Well hell, I’m totally over trying to predict what’s going to happen to Kim and Jimmy …

The Huell con was fun, intricate and exciting … gave Kim and Jimmy a chance to team up, Kim doing the brain work, Jimmy the grunt work. They went from barely speaking to a passionate slam up against the courthouse stairwell … then to bed for victory sex. He makes her laugh again using funny accents about crawdads in his pants. Did my heart good.

Again, I remember something creator Gould said long ago - that Kim and Jimmy seem to have the most fun when they’re scamming, or right after.

“Let’s do it again” certainly aims the show in a new direction. Maybe finally accepting one another for who they are and what they love to do? Maybe not Bonnie and Clyde, but this Huell caper danced on the edge, flirting with federal crime … which could lead to her disbarment.

How would S&W react if they found out Kim had used $400 an hour associates to defend a pickpocket for whalloping a cop with a bag of sandwiches? Or were they just law student props? The show made a point of ADA Suzanne commenting on Kim doing this pro bono. Kim replied - “I never said that.”

Seems that Kim’s involvement started with doing Jimmy a favor, to keep him from doing the cop-smear. During her meeting with ADA Suzanne she resented that Huell wasn’t being treated fairly, that his sentence was heavier than that of white defendants, etc. …then she really got mad about the scumbag lawyer comment.

Kim seems more motivated by unfairness than money … both she and Jimmy like to stick it to bullies.

Please don’t let the thrill of the scam destroy her - her favorite movie of all time is “To Kill a Mockingbird” because she wants to BE Atticus Finch! My fingers are crossed that she survives, and that was her card that Saul gave Francesca in the flashback earlier… and they’ll end up together in Nebraska for their golden years. They had that flashback for a reason DANG IT!

Poor Nacho in his fancy bachelor’s pad with cool art work, now being squeezed between Gus and another Salamanca. Lalo is going to be interesting - loved the light-hearted dancing around the kitchen - “taste this, you’re gonna die!” Nacho is saving money (or skimming?), making plans to escape to Canada with his father using fake IDs… yeah, like he’s going to get his Papa to leave. Wasn’t that Spanish song at the end - “paco, paco, paco … caballo” - about packing bags to ride horses to Canada?

Chilling - the last shot of Nacho in silhouette with the emphasis on his own earring …

Mike lets the Germans go out for a little “R and R” … to a strip club … where men hungry for women can look but not touch. I don’t understand.

And maybe it’s not just Kai who’s gonna die. Yes, Werner goofed up …but as soon as he said he misses his wife back home, and has never been away from her this long in 26 yrs … I knew he was a goner. He’s already shown that he can’t keep his mouth shut when he gets drunk. His pride for his father’s work on a world landmark compared with his work on something just as difficult… that no one will ever know about … made me sad.

Maybe the whole crew dies in a private plane crash going home …

Oh yes, I liked that Mrs. Nguyen finally showed some compassion by offering Jimmy advice about saying sorry, flowers and cloth napkin restaurants … and the strong rice wine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/952 "2018-09-30T13:40:05Z")

</div>

> [@soonerblue](#):
>
> How would S&W react if they found out Kim had used $400 an hour associates to defend a pickpocket for whalloping a cop with a bag of sandwiches? Or were they just law student props? The show made a point of ADA Suzanne commenting on Kim doing this pro bono. Kim replied - “I never said that.”  
> .

Most likely a kudos. It’s very common in most law firms to take cases pro bono or for reduced fees to break in the Baby Barristers. Outside of the large financial hubs like NY, London, Dubai etc, even big firms, even those with narrow specialties have at least some briefs and work on general matters. Three young lawyers got the experience of Court room litigations and negotiation. Skills easily transferable elsewhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![soonerblue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/soonerblue/32/3302_2.png) [@soonerblue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/soonerblue)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/953 "2018-09-30T16:12:02Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> Most likely a kudos. It’s very common in most law firms to take cases pro bono or for reduced fees to break in the Baby Barristers. Outside of the large financial hubs like NY, London, Dubai etc, even big firms, even those with narrow specialties have at least some briefs and work on general matters. Three young lawyers got the experience of Court room litigations and negotiation. Skills easily transferable elsewhere.

Thank you, most of what I know about law firms and courtrooms comes from TV shows and legal thrillers on the best-seller lists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![salinqmind](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3ec8ea/32.png) [@salinqmind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/salinqmind)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/954 "2018-09-30T18:06:54Z")

</div>

I’m kind of wondering, did Nacho buy himself that fancy new modern apartment? Complete with a couple of drug whores? Or was it given to him by the cartel as a perk, like a company owned pied-a-terre to live in? I may be all wrong, but he doesn’t seem to be the type who would pick out such a super-modern ‘urban penthouse’ place to live in. With his poor old father in a shack in the desert cranking out belts and purses, how did Nacho go from that to a glass walled Architectural Digest centerfold? Complete with a giggly druggie twosome to make a threesome?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 6:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/955 "2018-09-30T18:25:06Z")

</div>

The links between prostitution and drug running are old and established. I would ventured guess that the place is sort of a rec area/halls of residence. The prostitutes and muscle can relax and unwind. Maybe with each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pantastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3bc359/32.png) [@Pantastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pantastic)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/956 "2018-09-30T18:55:13Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> I’m pretty sure I didn’t bring up the issue of looking for fingerprints and/or DNA on the letters. I did indicate that I thought the scheme was provable _if_ the DA had infinite resources to investigate it. It is not plausible that she does, with time being the scarcest resource of all given that the judge wants the matter disposed of quickly. You can slather on the verbiage all you like to support whatever argument you seem to be making, though. I stand by the comments I’ve made, CSI-effect included.

Again, your assertion about ‘infinite resources’ is simply wrong. Simple phone calls and mail records requests to not require ‘infinite resources’. That’s what’s needed to established that the church doesn’t actually exist. Once that’s one, then there’s enough reason to spend the higher resources to check the prints on letters and pull harder records (phone ownership, Bus/train/plane tickets under likely names, and the like). And that’s a level of expense that’s routine in felony cases, not ‘infinite’.

Your assertion that the judge wants “the matter” disposed of quickly, and that that puts a limit on investigating the letters, is not supported by anything on the show. The judge states wants Huell’s trial disposed of without the ‘circus’ of busfulls of yokels, but says nothing about a time limit. There’s an implied limit of ‘by the time trial date comes up’, but that’s a typically delay of weeks or months without even filing for a continuance (which, incidentally, the judge has no reason to object to). Further, and more critically, that’s only about Huell’s case, the judge didn’t set any kind of restriction on resolving ‘the matter’ of the fake church and scam because he doesn’t actually think it’s fake. Huell’s trial isn’t actually a time limit for that, time is simply not a scarce resource if the ADA chooses to investigate.

> [@](#):
>
> Why would Kim’s fingerprints be on the cards? On review of the scene where she goes shopping at the office supply store, everything she buys is in boxes or wrapped in plastic. No big deal.

I thought Kim opened a card during the scene, but it looks like she only touches outside packaging. So no prints of hers, just Jimmy.

> [@AK84](#):
>
> Look DNA does not work that way. By the time the letters get to the ADA office, after being posted from Louisiana, they have been handled by multiple people, been place in multiple closed spaces, with other such letters so treated and exchanged DNA and smudged fingerprints. Getting a match on any of them would be functionally impossible. Getting something flagged quickly, in that era without connected databases; a legacy of the WoT, yeah forget it.

The INSIDE of the envelopes, where the cards are, have not been handled by multiple people except for the few that are opened in the office. Lifting fingerprints from paper is not a hard task, it’s done all the time. Getting a match would be absolutely trivial, because they wouldn’t need to run all fingerprints, just a few likely suspect who’s prints are on file (Jimmy and Huell, though Huell’s probably won’t turn up). Also they wouldn’t need to get something flagged quickly, as I pointed out above the time limit idea is not supported by reality or the show - fingerprint/dna evidence would be gathered AFTER realizing the church is a scam to try to find the perpetrator, it wouldn’t be the piece that shows that the church is a scam.

And no one is licking the letters to get their DNA on it, and from what we’re shown in the episode Jimmy is the only one licking envelopes (since he checks the cards before paying people). Contrary to your assertion, getting a DNA sample from a licked envelope is NOT functionally impossible, and was definitely doable in 2004:

> **[DNA on envelope sealed man’s conviction in ’82 murder — now he’ll go free](https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/dna-on-envelope-sealed-mans-conviction-in-82-murder-8212-now-hell-go-free/)**
>
> John Nicholas Athan, the former Seattle man convicted of murder after he unwittingly gave police a DNA sample by licking an envelope, will be released on parole this year.

Oh, and real-world investigators think that your ‘functionally impossible’ lifting of DNA is a reasonable thing to try to envelops that have been sitting around since 1969:

> **[Will DNA Solve 1969 Zodiac Killings?](https://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=131951&page=1)**

> [@](#):
>
> As for her digging deeper., well remember, we have God’s eye view.

All of the items I’m discussing are predicated on her suspecting that the church is fraudulent and choosing to investigate that. What we see in this episode indicates that she doesn’t. It’s come from a discussion of the risks and vulnerabilities of the scheme and cover-up.

> [@](#):
>
> And, no it’s not realistic that she couldn’t just call and find out from Louisiana Police and the local District Attorney or the IRS. Such inter agency request take weeks to make officially and longer to actually realise, and the most likely return is basically a request for clarification or the answer to a question not even asked, trust me, I have experience with this type of things and it’s in our era of much grater data sharing. The ADA does not have time and expense to run such things, for a small case. She does as much due diligence as possible in an afternoon, in the confines of her office, using a landline and 2004 era internet.

No, they don’t. I know people who are social workers (not even ADAs) who call police for basic information about people and situations, it takes a brief phone call not a week and batch of forms. Some kinds of formal interagency documents will take forever, but that’s not what I’m talking about - this would be a basic verbal request for information to point the investigation in the right direction. But hey, that’s just assertion vs assertion, so I’ll PROVE your claim that it takes weeks to get a response from the IRS is false. If you want to verify if a non-profit is recognized by the IRS, you can do it today. Go to [this link](https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/exempt-organizations-business-master-file-extract-eo-bmf) and pick a state, and you’ve got every single one in the state. Go to a [different link](https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/) and you can do a search for a specific entity. Funnily enough, that didn’t take weeks, and didn’t result in a cycle of requests for clarifications. I’m not sure when the web search went online (I wouldn’t be surprised if it was post 2004), but there is also a number you can call to check tax exempt status which was definitely around then. Common anti-scam advise is to check the tax exempt status of any place you’re thinking of making a donation to, not finding it for an alleged church is a huge red flag.

Also two other places to quickly find a problem:  
Local library, ask for basic info on the church, there won’t be any. (Yes, reference desks generally would do a phone book lookup)  
Local information (usually 312-555-1212) and ask for the Church’s number, discover that it’s not listed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pantastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3bc359/32.png) [@Pantastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pantastic)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/957 "2018-09-30T19:08:20Z")

</div>

> [@soonerblue](#):
>
> Mike lets the Germans go out for a little “R and R” … to a strip club … where men hungry for women can look but not touch. I don’t understand.

Yeah, I think it was a really bad choice and I don’t get it. Renting a vacation house for a weekend or week and bringing in some girls would be easy to do, not overly expensive, provide better security, give anyone who doesn’t like strip clubs a chance to fish or sunbathe or whatever, and provide a real chance to get out of work mode. Aren’t most West Europeans used to 4-6 weeks of vacation a year?

[quote]  
And maybe it’s not just Kai who’s gonna die.

I’m still on team ‘no die for Kai’. He’s mouthy, but he’s not making the ‘let me tell you about the secret project’ screwups.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/958 "2018-09-30T19:34:30Z")

</div>

Well, at least I kept _my_ assertions to under novel-length.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biffster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/biffster/32/339_2.png) [@Biffster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biffster)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 9:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/959 "2018-09-30T21:28:41Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Well, at least I kept _my_ assertions to under novel-length.

Ouch! I guess some folks take the show pretty seriously.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 10:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/960 "2018-09-30T22:25:37Z")

</div>

> [@soonerblue](#):
>
> …And maybe it’s not just Kai who’s gonna die. Yes, Werner goofed up …but as soon as he said he misses his wife back home, and has never been away from her this long in 26 yrs … I knew he was a goner. …

We know that the BCS writers are well aware of drama’s clichés and tropes, and enjoy subverting them. So this may be a case of setting up expectations in genre-savvy viewers—that the writers will then proceed to flout.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![divemaster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/divemaster/32/78_2.png) [@divemaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/divemaster)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/961 "2018-09-30T22:36:56Z")

</div>

> [@Tread](#):
>
> Being only about 40 minutes from Choushatta, , the way they pronounced it, as well as Pontchartrain hurt my ears, and bothered me at first as poor research, but then figured The DA, Kim, or Jimmy probably would have no reason to know how we pronounced it, ad was OK with it, now if they had spoken to anyone in the town then I would expect them to know how to pronounce their home town.

Ha! Yes. I just watched the episode and wondered if this had come up as a thread topic.

First off, if you are doing a Coushatta accent, it sure ain’t Cajun. There are no Cajuns in Coushatta. Well, maybe one or two who wandered into the northern part of the state, but essentially, no Cajuns. The accent up there is “East Texas nasal drawl.”

And, like \*\*Tread \*\*mentioned, they pronounced “Coushatta” and “Lake Pontchartrain” wrong. And Lake Ponchartrain is like 4 hours away from Coushatta, across the Great Cultural Divide of Louisiana. LP comes up in casual conversation in northeast Louisiana approximately never.

And Jimmy referred to the ADA as “y’all.” Yes, it would have been okay if the implication was that he was referring to the ADA _and her legal team_, but it sure seemed like he was addressing her personally.

Southerners don’t refer to a singular person as “y’all.”

Hollywood southerners refer to a singular person as “y’all” all the damn time.

Anyway, these are minor gripes. I’m good with suspending my disbelief to allow the plot to move forward the way the writers want. Sure, the scam could fall apart in any number of ways, but I’m good with taking it on faith that it worked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EllisDee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ellisdee/32/4531_2.png) [@EllisDee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EllisDee)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792/962 "2018-09-30T23:05:18Z")

</div>

> [@divemaster](#):
>
> Anyway, these are minor gripes.

As pointed out in the post you quoted, would Jimmy know any of that? If he wouldn’t, those gripes miss the point completely.

This isn’t a show set in LA with LA characters. It’s a show set in NM with a NM conman impersonating someone from LA. I would think it would be less plausible if he got the accents and subtleties right.

Quick specific example: Does Jimmy the character know that you don’t say “y’all” to a single person? Where would he have learned his y’all usage from? TV, maybe?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792.md?page=47)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/better-call-saul-season-iv/818792.md?page=49)
