# Biden's choice for vice presidential candidate

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [April 10, 2020, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505 "2020-04-10T15:04:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Lendervedder](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/happy_lendervedder/32/8488_2.png) [@Happy\_Lendervedder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Lendervedder)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/41 "2020-04-11T20:00:09Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There is no Democratic woman that appeals to white women. Hillary was probably ultimate white woman presidential candidate. There is no way anyone today can top her credentials, but white women still voted for Trump in '16. I’ll say it again, white women voted overwhelmingly for Trump.
> 
> How do you all explain that?

There are plenty of threads analyzing 2016 without having to get into it here

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![split\_p\_j](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e19b73/32.png) [@split\_p\_j](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/split_p_j)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/42 "2020-04-11T20:43:23Z")

</div>

Ok, then why does Biden think having a woman VP is the key for him now?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/43 "2020-04-11T20:43:53Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> Hillary was probably ultimate white woman presidential candidate. There is no way anyone today can top her credentials

Jeanne Shaheen has served as a Senator for more years than Clinton did, and served as a Governor for more years than Clinton was a cabinet secretary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 8:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/44 "2020-04-11T20:52:34Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> Why does the VP have to be a woman?

It doesn’t. But it’s okay that Biden is choosing a woman as VP. There’s nothing wrong with choosing a woman as VP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![split\_p\_j](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e19b73/32.png) [@split\_p\_j](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/split_p_j)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 9:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/45 "2020-04-11T21:11:02Z")

</div>

I know there is nothing wrong with a woman VP, but he has excluded any male as a potential VP. Why? I actually know the answer, he wants to appear to be “woke”, but this is a huge blunder that will cost him the election. Even if he was going that way, a smart man would have left himself an option.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 9:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/46 "2020-04-11T21:21:44Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> I know there is nothing wrong with a woman VP, but he has excluded any male as a potential VP. Why? I actually know the answer, he wants to appear to be “woke”, but this is a huge blunder that will cost him the election. Even if he was going that way, a smart man would have left himself an option.

That’s one possible answer. It’s far from the only one, though.

Here’s another: he has already whittled down his list to the most qualified/best candidates, and they are women (or possibly even a single woman). He considered several men earlier, but decided they weren’t the best candidates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Locrian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/locrian/32/14146_2.png) [@Locrian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Locrian)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 9:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/47 "2020-04-11T21:48:19Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> I totally agree with everything you said here, but I will and will go even further to show how inept he is.
> 
> Now that he has said it’s going to be a woman, I think he will double down and pick a black woman. That is going to be a huge mistake. Any Biden VP pick has a good chance of taking over during his term if his health fails, and lets be real, he seems like a frail old man. People know this, its being calculated into the choice voters make.
> 
> There is absolutely no way this country will tolerate a black woman as president. They will not vote for a ticket that has a clearly fading older white man with a black woman as the backup.

I’m with you here. I think it’s a blunder for a couple reasons. First, the fact that a rich idiot with no real experience in anything but being handed money beats a white woman with all the needed qualifications (IMO) in 2016. From that I thought that if the Dems put up a woman for their nom as president this year, she might as well campaign from her front lawn and never travel. White women voted for Trump and a lot of white women stayed home and didn’t vote. So why limit the contenders for VP as only for women? There’s plenty of damn-qualified ones, and it might energize the Dem base, but what fence sitter would really want Klobuchar, Warren, Harris, etc. in the WH if Biden croaks? I’d like a female VP so we can finally get some different perspective in the Exec branch. But the VP certainly doesn’t have to be female to get me out to vote against Der Bungle.

Second, now that’ he’s promised a woman, let’s say he’s changed his mind. Picks a man instead. That would be seen as “he’s not even elected and he’s already not fulfilling his promises! Aaaaaah!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lamoral](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lamoral/32/16078_2.png) [@Lamoral](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lamoral)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/48 "2020-04-11T21:51:26Z")

</div>

> [@Locrian](#):
>
> Second, now that’ he’s promised a woman, let’s say he’s changed his mind. Picks a man instead. That would be seen as “he’s not even elected and he’s already not fulfilling his promises! Aaaaaah!”

This was implied, though not stated, to be a given in my initial critique. He can’t go back on it. That’s political suicide. He made the commitment, he’s stuck with it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/49 "2020-04-11T22:23:26Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There is no Democratic woman that appeals to white women. Hillary was probably ultimate white woman presidential candidate. There is no way anyone today can top her credentials, but white women still voted for Trump in '16. I’ll say it again, white women voted overwhelmingly for Trump.
> 
> How do you all explain that?

It can be explained easily: [It isn’t true.](https://www.people-press.org/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-voters/) Clinton came a lot closer than the unreliable 2016 exit polls suggested.

The democrats don’t need a huge shift to tip the balance. White woman are more likely to shift away from the republican ticket than white men. A VP can help that swing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Red\_Wiggler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/red_wiggler/32/13190_2.png) [@Red\_Wiggler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Red_Wiggler)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 10:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/50 "2020-04-11T22:58:15Z")

</div>

Donald got, what, 52% of the white woman vote in '16 and won’t do as well in November.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/51 "2020-04-11T23:06:41Z")

</div>

> [@Red\_Wiggler](#):
>
> Donald got, what, 52% of the white woman vote in '16 and won’t do as well in November.

47% as per the link above your post( as opposed to 45% for Clinton ).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 11:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/52 "2020-04-11T23:46:34Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> That’s one possible answer. It’s far from the only one, though.
> 
> Here’s another: he has already whittled down his list to the most qualified/best candidates, and they are women (or possibly even a single woman). He considered several men earlier, but decided they weren’t the best candidates.

I was hiring for an IT position once, and got 20 candidates (they were people whose qualifications passed a filter before getting to me). Of those 20, 2 were women. And they were not remotely qualified; I needed someone I could put to work right away diagnosing and fixing issues, and they basically had help desk experience, where they took calls and passed them on to technicians. Potentially trainable but I needed someone that could start right away, not a trainee.

So I knew I was only hiring a man. Not by deliberate choice. I was very disappointed that I wasn’t able to give serious consideration to a woman candidate. Diversity matters to me. But I wasn’t going to consider someone with no real experience just because of her gender.

So if Joe is going through a similar situation, where all of his potential running mates happen to be women, I find that plausible. Sometimes that’s what happens.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chefguy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chefguy/32/138_2.png) [@Chefguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chefguy)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2020, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/53 "2020-04-11T23:58:29Z")

</div>

We kicked this around the other night. The VP candidate needs to bring the fire and brimstone to the campaign. That leaves out Kamala Harris. While she’s smart and capable, the debates showed her to be too much like a hipster. Also, her attack on Biden as being senile won’t be forgotten by him.

Warren is brilliant, a powerful debater, and can really rain down hell on the campaign trail, but what else does she bring? She’s also 70 years old, which means that if Biden completes two terms, she’s pushing 80. Not a great prospect for continuity.

Our choice is Stacey Abrams, as she can bring the southern voters and encourage black turnout. Not to mention she’s smart and articulate and only 46 years old.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Win\_Place\_Show](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/win_place_show/32/13469_2.png) [@Win\_Place\_Show](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Win_Place_Show)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2020, 2:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/54 "2020-04-12T02:53:49Z")

</div>

> [@Loach](#):
>
> My feeling is Biden will 1) pick a woman

Why would you say that? Perhaps because he announced in a nationally televised debate that he would pick a woman? Sheesh.

> [@Loach](#):
>
> 1. pick someone he can work with like he worked with Obama

A presidential candidate pick a VP that he can work with? Good God man, now you’re onto something!

> [@Loach](#):
>
> 1. pick someone who hasn’t fought against his plans.

This is a repeat of # 2 but with different wording.

Thank you for your groundbreaking political insight. I look forward to your return to this thread in a couple of months snarking about how you were right on all three counts. :smack:  
And on another note, do we not merge identical threads together anymore? Didn’t we cover this exact same topic over a several week long thread elsewhere?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2020, 3:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/55 "2020-04-12T03:13:53Z")

</div>

> [@Win\_Place\_Show](#):
>
> And on another note, do we not merge identical threads together anymore? Didn’t we cover this exact same topic over a several week long thread elsewhere?

I don’t know. Did we?

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> We did a long thread on this, [Biden’s Running Mate Prediction Thread](https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=891656), a couple of weeks ago. I don’t think anything has changed since.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kolak_of_twilo/32/73_2.png) [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolak_of_Twilo)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2020, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/56 "2020-04-12T03:16:52Z")

</div>

> [@Happy\_Lendervedder](#):
>
> Except klobuchar brings neither electoral votes nor grassroots excitement from her failed presidential run. She’s a boring moderate from Minnesota. There’s a place in the cabinet I’m sure, but she adds nothing to a ticket that already has a somewhat lackluster main candidate.

Except Klobuchar _keeps_ MN in the D column. It was very close in 2016.

Klobuchar would likely attract some folks in other upper Midwest states who may have sat it out or voted for DJT. I’m looking at WI, maybe IA. She might even draw a few votes in MI. Those are states that are crucial to a D win in November.

The press conference where she endorsed Biden showed me there was chemistry there, similar to Obama and Biden. Joe’s speech after her speech was one of the best he has given in this entire campaign.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Win\_Place\_Show](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/win_place_show/32/13469_2.png) [@Win\_Place\_Show](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Win_Place_Show)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2020, 3:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/57 "2020-04-12T03:27:31Z")

</div>

> [@BlankSlate](#):
>
> It can be explained easily: [It isn’t true.](https://www.people-press.org/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-voters/)

Thank you for that link, that was a fascinating read! I knew the data can be “sliced and diced” all sorts of ways, but the way that author drilled down into the data was incredibly thorough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![China\_Guy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/779978/32.png) [@China\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/China_Guy)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2020, 5:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/58 "2020-04-12T05:19:36Z")

</div>

From a pure marketing perspective, and woman brings along the most “undecided” voters. trump is white on white, with pence pandering to the evangelicals.

A woman on the ticket is a free option on a woman actually becoming the first female president given biden’s age. If one happens to want a female as the president, the best odds in 2020 is as biden’s veep either for death, senility or 2024. If you’re a democratic leaning male, you still get joe, and who knows what happens in the future (the woman’s place is in the home vote already goes to pence, so no need to try crossover).

I keep saying that a female general would be great marketing. Bring along more of the military vote.

Tammy Duckworth is growing on me. She’s not a general, but as a Lieutenant Colonel was a lot more than “just a combat pilot that lost both legs in combat.”

Still, from pure marketing, a black female general seems like a big draw to me. YMMV

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2020, 5:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/59 "2020-04-12T05:42:23Z")

</div>

> [@Chefguy](#):
>
> We kicked this around the other night. The VP candidate needs to bring the fire and brimstone to the campaign. That leaves out Kamala Harris. While she’s smart and capable, the debates showed her to be too much like a hipster. Also, her attack on Biden as being senile won’t be forgotten by him.
> 
> Warren is brilliant, a powerful debater, and can really rain down hell on the campaign trail, but what else does she bring? She’s also 70 years old, which means that if Biden completes two terms, she’s pushing 80. Not a great prospect for continuity.
> 
> Our choice is Stacey Abrams, as she can bring the southern voters and encourage black turnout. Not to mention she’s smart and articulate and only 46 years old.

I generally agree with you. I think she might be able to flip Georgia.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2020, 8:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505/60 "2020-04-12T08:01:33Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> I generally agree with you. I think she might be able to flip Georgia.

Not impossible - Clinton won there in 1992, albeit with Perot siphoning off ~13% of the vote.

But color me skeptical. After all Abrams wasn’t able to flip it in her own campaign. Georgia might be paler red than almost anywhere else in the deep south outside of North Carolina, but I dunno if it is all that purple. If Obama-Biden couldn’t crack it( and they didn’t really get close ), I’m doubtful Biden-Abrams would do that much better.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bidens-choice-for-vice-presidential-candidate/851505.md?page=4)
