# Big Bang

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [May 22, 2002, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253 "2002-05-22T06:00:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 8
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Qeue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/b5ac83/32.png) [@Qeue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qeue)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2002, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253/1 "2002-05-22T06:00:53Z")

</div>

Evidence for supporting the theory of the Big Bang is as follows:

The darkness of the sky - Olbers paradox  
The Hubble Law - the linear distance vs. redshift law  
Homogeneity - our location in the universe is not special  
Isotropy - the sky looks the same in all directions to 1 part in 100,000  
CMBR - Cosmic microwave background radiation - the universe has evolved from a dense, isothermal state

Are you in agreement with this theory or do you think the universe has always existed ? Do you think the universe is finite in size or is infinite and boundless ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2002, 7:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253/2 "2002-05-22T07:57:29Z")

</div>

Finite and boundless in my (unqualified) opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Qeue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/b5ac83/32.png) [@Qeue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qeue)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2002, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253/3 "2002-05-22T14:26:24Z")

</div>

Mangetout

_Finite and boundless in my (unqualified) opinion._

Hey, who really _is_ qualified ? 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![muttrox](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a8b319/32.png) [@muttrox](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/muttrox)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2002, 2:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253/4 "2002-05-22T14:58:49Z")

</div>

Do you have a question of fact? Poll questions aren’t suitable for GQ.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2002, 3:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253/5 "2002-05-22T15:07:58Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Mangetout \*  
> \*\*Finite and boundless in my (unqualified) opinion. \*\*

I used to think so as well (and I am just as unqualified as you if not more unqualified) but I think the new thinking on this is the Universe is flat and hence infinite.

Also, the is a new theory for the Big Bang called (I think) the [Cyclic Universe](http://www.sciam.com/explorations/2002/021102cyclic/) (or Brane…not really sure) theory. This new theory does away with some inconvieneces of Big Bang theory. Of course, it is a relatively new theory so it comes with problems of its own and still has a way to go before it topples the Big Bang as the reigning theory for Creation.

Still, I like the new theory because it postulates a recycling universe. If the Universe is inifinte and expands forever it means that sooner or later the Universe will die a heat death and be a completely uninteresting place. I find that possibility distinctly unsettling. I know choosing a theory based merely upon what I like isn’t very scientific but I can’t help it so I hope the Cyclic Universe deal pans out (or at least some theory that allows interesting universes to be re-created ad-naseum).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Qeue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/b5ac83/32.png) [@Qeue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qeue)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2002, 3:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253/6 "2002-05-22T15:08:10Z")

</div>

muttrox

Sorry, I’m new here. If this thread is not in the appropriate forum, I would appreciate it moved.

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Qeue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/b5ac83/32.png) [@Qeue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qeue)
#### Post date: [May 23, 2002, 2:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253/7 "2002-05-23T14:51:23Z")

</div>

According to the Very Small Array, the Unverse is flat, Omega\_O is ~1, existence of dark matter and dark energy confirmed.  
[http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/telescopes/vsa/index.html](http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/telescopes/vsa/index.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Qeue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/b5ac83/32.png) [@Qeue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qeue)
#### Post date: [May 23, 2002, 2:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-bang/110253/8 "2002-05-23T14:57:11Z")

</div>

According to the Very Small Array, the Unverse is flat, Omega\_O is ~1, existence of dark matter and dark energy confirmed.  
[http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/telescopes/vsa/index.html](http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/telescopes/vsa/index.html)
