# Big Brother 7/29/04--SPOILERS! **URL:** \ **Category:** Cafe Society\ **Created:** [July 30, 2004, 2:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-brother-7-29-04-spoilers/257541 "2004-07-30T02:15:24Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 5
**Author:** ![monstro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba9def/32.png) [@monstro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/monstro)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2004, 10:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-brother-7-29-04-spoilers/257541/81 "2004-07-30T22:04:07Z")
I think Jase is smarter, but Scott is more evil. Look at how he’s managed to work over Cowboy and Drew. They worship him. I think Jase has tainted himself with the Holly stuff. In the looks department, both are ugly. Jase looks much older than 28 and Scott’s weenie is hideous. ---
**Author:** ![jayjay](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jayjay/32/6765_2.png) [@jayjay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jayjay)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2004, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-brother-7-29-04-spoilers/257541/82 "2004-07-30T22:06:26Z")
> [@monstro](#): > > In the looks department, both are ugly. Jase looks much older than 28 and Scott’s weenie is hideous. Thank you! I don’t find either one of them attractive, really. Although, to be fair, (and I’m speaking as an anything-but-innocent gay man here) a weenie out of context tends to look either ridiculous or hideous no matter who it’s attached to. Of course, even _in_ context, Scott’s weenie is hideous… ---
**Author:** ![Jaade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/dfb087/32.png) [@Jaade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jaade)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2004, 11:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-brother-7-29-04-spoilers/257541/83 "2004-07-30T23:28:45Z")
I woke up right about the time the recappers started posting that Diane had won. Went back to sleep for an hour with a smile on my face. Drew is safe, and I think Michael’s pretty safe as well. Scott and Jase have much to be concerned about. However, after the voting debacle, I’m not sure that Jase would veto Scott, even if he wasn’t the one against him. I think this could very well be the end of the Four Horsemen as well as the Van Buren (is that what he called them?) boys. **Liberal** , I love your Lifesavers graph! Thank you! (Where’s the cracker?!?) I cannot believe these fools think that boy really has an Escladade. If he were a football player, shouldn’t he be…oh, I don’t know…getting ready for football season? **masonite** , I’m not sure that Marv or CB will wisen up before their “alliance” completely screws them over. CB doesn’t see that they don’t really like him, and Marv has apparently not noticed that they ignore him until they need to tell him what to do. **jayjay** , I’m glad to hear that your interview went well! ---
**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\ **Post date:** [July 31, 2004, 7:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-brother-7-29-04-spoilers/257541/84 "2004-07-31T07:57:30Z")
Semi-official: It’s Jase and Scott ---
**Author:** ![AllShookDown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/d9b06d/32.png) [@AllShookDown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AllShookDown)\ **Post date:** [July 31, 2004, 9:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-brother-7-29-04-spoilers/257541/85 "2004-07-31T21:48:02Z")
> [@masonite](#): > > Well there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with my refresh button, then, unless your information is direct from the recaps and the Hamster Time recappers are slacking off. Holding down the shift key while clicking refresh at Hamstertime seems to work. I don’t like the new structure of the veto competition. With four people playing for the nominees and two playing for the HOH, there’s just too great of a chance of a nominee being taken off the block. The HOH has a lot less power now. I think the HOH’s are going to have to start playing this by putting people up they don’t want to be voted off so they can put up who they really want after the veto is used. Putting up people you don’t want voted off is dangerous but, the way things have been going, I think they’re going to have to assume that the veto will be won by a nominee (or a nominee’s second) when making the nominations. ---
**Author:** ![AllShookDown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/d9b06d/32.png) [@AllShookDown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AllShookDown)\ **Post date:** [July 31, 2004, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-brother-7-29-04-spoilers/257541/86 "2004-07-31T21:50:53Z")
Plus, if they play it that way, then throw the veto competition so the nominees do win it, they’re almost guaranteed to use it. Then the HOH just has to worry about the person they really want up being the veto holder since they can’t nominate the person who uses the veto. ---
**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\ **Post date:** [July 31, 2004, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-brother-7-29-04-spoilers/257541/87 "2004-07-31T23:48:33Z")
The following link is a possible spoiler. It looks like someone has analyzed [Drew’s moles](http://www.jokersupdates.com/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Board=bbnewsandrumors&Number=1034441&page=0&view=expanded&sb=5&o=&fpart=1&mrd=1089566528). [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/big-brother-7-29-04-spoilers/257541.md?page=4)