Revisiting the age discrepancy, Holling & Shelly from Northern Exposure were (from the actor’s ages) 35 years apart. Cute couple, but still quite unusual for the TV landscape (as far as long-term relationships go).
Well, at least Roger was devoted to her. He may not have had the looks, but he did bring the love. Most sitcom husbands in this category are arseholes.
Lookswise, absolutely. I think George Costanza and every one of his girlfriends is a better example, though. He’s a pig as well as ugly.
Actually when she started packing on the (pregnancy) lbs, and he lost a few the roles sort of reversed. He’s not a bad looking guy at all so long as he’s not 100 lbs overweight. She does not carry excess weight well - at all.
On Northern Exposure, though, the age difference really was supposed to be accentuated, and made the relationship something much more interresting. Besides, Holling might have been old, but he was one hell of a guy, according to all the stories that got passed around on the show.
I dunno, I bought him with Sylvia. (Sylvia? The DA played by Sharon Lawrence.) The blonde he ended up with after I stopped watching the show, though – I don’t think so.
I haven’t noticed any cases of the husband way too hot for the wife…just like you never see 50-something females boinking 20-something men, etc. in the movies, but you sure see a lot of the reverse.
I was going to say Jerry, but you’re right. George is better.
That’s the one I was coming in to say. Plus, that mother-in-law drives me into a coughing-up-blood rage whenever she’s on screen. She deserves every Emmy she’s ever won.