# Bill O'Reilly says he wants to be just like Saddam

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 26, 2006, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226 "2006-06-26T16:58:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/1 "2006-06-26T16:58:13Z")

</div>

In one of Bildo’s [latest rants](http://mediamatters.org/items/200606200008), I think he’s revealed more about himself and his lack of mental stability than he probably really wanted to:

> [@](#):
>
> O’REILLY: So because – what you have here now is a tipping point in history. A tipping point in history. So you have to win the Iraq situation. Now, to me, they’re not fighting it hard enough. See, if I’m president, I’ve got probably another 50-60,000 with orders to shoot on sight anybody violating curfews. Shoot 'em on sight. That’s me. President O’Reilly, curfew in Ramadi, 7 o’clock at night. You’re on the street, you’re dead. I shoot you right between the eyes. OK?
> 
> That’s how I’d run that country – just like Saddam ran it. Saddam didn’t have explosions. He didn’t have bombers, did he? Because if you got out of line, you’re dead.

Man, that would be a great campaign speech, wouldn’t it? “You get out of line and you’re DEAD, motherfuckers!”

This guy seems to spend a lot of time fantasizing about shooting people between the eyes (or “between the head” in the case of Al Franken). I started to wonder a couple of years ago whether O’Reilly might literally be mentally ill. The more time goes on, the less I wonder.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biggirl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/biggirl/32/3294_2.png) [@Biggirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biggirl)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/2 "2006-06-26T17:05:21Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes the Cynic](#):
>
> In one of Bildo’s [latest rants](http://mediamatters.org/items/200606200008), I think he’s revealed more about himself and his lack of mental stability than he probably really wanted to:

Here I am thinking “Our own, illustrious, wonderful, organizational man **Bildo** said all of that?” And I was confused.

Then I realized you mean that other guy from TV. The one who lies all the time. Big diff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/3 "2006-06-26T17:05:54Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes the Cynic](#):
>
> I started to wonder a couple of years ago whether O’Reilly might literally be mentally ill. The more time goes on, the less I wonder.

_Nobody’s_ that loony. The only commentator who I think really believes their shit is Bob Novak.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Phlosphr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/c68b51/32.png) [@Phlosphr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Phlosphr)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/4 "2006-06-26T17:20:45Z")

</div>

Well I’m glad others feel Billy-O is a lunatic. Oh oops… I’m sorry thats a little too tame for this forum…

Well I’m glad others feel Bill-Fucking-O is a raving fuck-tard…

Where others have hearts, he carries a tumor of rotten principles.

- Jack London

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 5:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/5 "2006-06-26T17:25:31Z")

</div>

I say we grant his wish. Throw him in a bag, fly him to Baghdad, and drop him on the corner of Liberty Street and Freedom Way (formerly Saddam Road and Saddam Avenue) with a sash that says “President of Iraq” around his shoulders, and let Bill take care of the rest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/6 "2006-06-26T17:27:03Z")

</div>

O’Reilly does have an eye-rolling tendancy to grossly oversimplify complex issues like this. There are plenty of ways to better enforce curfews (if they’re needed) without shooting violators on sight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CynicalGabe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/3e96dc/32.png) [@CynicalGabe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CynicalGabe)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 5:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/7 "2006-06-26T17:43:11Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> I say we grant his wish. Throw him in a bag, fly him to Baghdad, and drop him on the corner of Liberty Street and Freedom Way (formerly Saddam Road and Saddam Avenue) with a sash that says “President of Iraq” around his shoulders, and let Bill take care of the rest.

He’d be leading the insurgency within 20 minutes. Megalomaniacs are the same no matter what their ideology.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 5:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/8 "2006-06-26T17:45:07Z")

</div>

> [@CynicalGabe](#):
>
> He’d be leading the insurgency within 20 minutes. Megalomaniacs are the same no matter what their ideology.

Then Bill O’Reilly becomes the #1 Enemy of America and eventually gets bombed to bits. I’d laugh, then I’d cheer. I don’t see a problem with this outcome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loopydude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/e56c9b/32.png) [@Loopydude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loopydude)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 5:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/9 "2006-06-26T17:54:09Z")

</div>

You’re so fucking overreacting. Did he say he was going to _gas_ women and children? _Did he say that_ you goat-felching pigfucker? Because that’s what sub-human 3rd world dictators do, they _gas_ people. Sarin is _not_ 7.62mm jacketed hollow-point round. There’s is a _huge_ fucking difference between shooting a woman between the eyes who’s breaking curfew and gassing her during daylight. Can’t you fucking _see_ that, you knee-jerk America-bashing fuckwit!!!1!11!!!

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Merijeek](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f05b48/32.png) [@Merijeek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Merijeek)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/10 "2006-06-26T17:55:39Z")

</div>

What? No slew of posts informing us what BillO **really** meant? Not even the people that assure us that Rush “I put the Heroin in Hillbilly Heroin” Limbaugh is actually putting on a big act?

Nobody?

-Joe

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/11 "2006-06-26T18:02:47Z")

</div>

> [@Merijeek](#):
>
> What? No slew of posts informing us what BillO **really** meant? Not even the people that assure us that Rush “I put the Heroin in Hillbilly Heroin” Limbaugh is actually putting on a big act?

Well, there’s a couple of problems with that. Firstly, it’s not like this conclusion is a result of suggestion; he did come right out and make clear what he was talking about. The only real defense is to say he was being entirely sarcastic or joking; i’m sure that’ll be the position taken.

The most interesting thing is that is Bill isn’t joking, to defend his words is to say _terrorism has risen as a result of the war_. If Bill is correct, or his words are understandable, then that points out that Saddam was much more able to control any terrorist threat than the coalition forces are; and if that’s true, the rationale for going to war is totally underminded.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/12 "2006-06-26T18:06:21Z")

</div>

> [@Loopydude](#):
>
> There’s is a _huge_ fucking difference between shooting a woman between the eyes who’s breaking curfew and gassing her during daylight.

Not if you ask the woman…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loopydude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/e56c9b/32.png) [@Loopydude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loopydude)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 6:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/13 "2006-06-26T18:10:18Z")

</div>

Holy fuck, that hadn’t occurred to me at all. Thank you. I’m such a fucking ass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Hamster\_King](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8edcca/32.png) [@The\_Hamster\_King](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Hamster_King)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/14 "2006-06-26T18:24:00Z")

</div>

> [@Merijeek](#):
>
> What? No slew of posts informing us what BillO **really** meant? Not even the people that assure us that Rush “I put the Heroin in Hillbilly Heroin” Limbaugh is actually putting on a big act?

Maybe, like Ann Coulter, he’s just a brilliant satirist and us humorless liberals are too dense to get the joke.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 7:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/15 "2006-06-26T19:26:48Z")

</div>

> [@Revenant Threshold](#):
>
> The most interesting thing is that is Bill isn’t joking, to defend his words is to say _terrorism has risen as a result of the war_. If Bill is correct, or his words are understandable, then that points out that Saddam was much more able to control any terrorist threat than the coalition forces are; and if that’s true, the rationale for going to war is totally underminded.

Not really, since he seems to think that the “shoot to kill” order would need to be in effect for only a few months-- until the gov’t is stablized. Now, one might argue that he’s being naive in thinking two or three months will make any difference, but that’s a separate matter.

Plus, Bush’s argument in going to war wasn’t that Saddam could or couldn’t control terrorist threats, but that he was in league with some terrorists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ponder\_Stibbons](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ponder_stibbons/32/343_2.png) [@Ponder\_Stibbons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ponder_Stibbons)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 8:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/16 "2006-06-26T20:28:12Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes the Cynic](#):
>
> Man, that would be a great campaign speech, wouldn’t it? “You get out of line and you’re DEAD, motherfuckers!”

It would if the person saying it was Samuel L. Jackson. 🆒

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/17 "2006-06-26T22:03:36Z")

</div>

> [@John Mace](#):
>
> Not really, since he seems to think that the “shoot to kill” order would need to be in effect for only a few months-- until the gov’t is stablized. Now, one might argue that he’s being naive in thinking two or three months will make any difference, but that’s a separate matter.

The point still stands that Bill thinks Saddam’s methods would be effective and advisable to use; even though he believes (as you say) that after this results in stability that the killings could be stopped, it doesn’t diminish that he feels that for a while they’re acceptable.

> [@](#):
>
> Plus, Bush’s argument in going to war wasn’t that Saddam could or couldn’t control terrorist threats, but that he was in league with some terrorists.

I wasn’t actually thinking about that rationale, but the “we need to save the people there” basis; Bill’s pointing out that Saddam’s internal policies for keeping Iraqi terrorist actions down against _him_ (Saddam, not Bill) could be used by the coalition forces to keep terrorist actions against _them_ down. By using those tactics ourselves, we aren’t any better than he was; and so the rationale of saving the Iraqi populace doesn’t hold up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AskNott](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asknott/32/5790_2.png) [@AskNott](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AskNott)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 10:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/18 "2006-06-26T22:07:01Z")

</div>

Granting O’Reilly his wish would give him a sudden realization of what a War On Christianity really looks like. He’d know that only briefly, until he became just another Bhagdad bodybag. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/19 "2006-06-26T22:29:30Z")

</div>

> [@Revenant Threshold](#):
>
> The point still stands that Bill thinks Saddam’s methods would be effective and advisable to use; even though he believes (as you say) that after this results in stability that the killings could be stopped, it doesn’t diminish that he feels that for a while they’re acceptable.

Right, he is saying that they are acceptable on a temporary basis.

> [@](#):
>
> I wasn’t actually thinking about that rationale, but the “we need to save the people there” basis; Bill’s pointing out that Saddam’s internal policies for keeping Iraqi terrorist actions down against _him_ (Saddam, not Bill) could be used by the coalition forces to keep terrorist actions against _them_ down. By using those tactics ourselves, we aren’t any better than he was; and so the rationale of saving the Iraqi populace doesn’t hold up.

I didn’t read your other post that way, but if that’s what you meant, it still doesn’t undermine the rational for the war. Using 1 of Saddam’s “evil tactics” for several months wouldn’t mean that we had suppressed the Iraqis in a manner equivalent to Saddam. In fact, I don’t even know that Saddam used curfews (with shoot-to-kill orders for violators) to control his people, but if he did, that wasn’t the most brutal of his practices.

Please note that I’m not trying to defend either the war or O’Reilly’s suggestion. I’m just pointing out that you haven’t made a case against the rational that Bush used in going to war.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Billdo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/billdo/32/315_2.png) [@Billdo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Billdo)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2006, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226/20 "2006-06-26T23:13:39Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes the Cynic](#):
>
> In one of Bildo’s [latest rants](http://mediamatters.org/items/200606200008), I think he’s revealed more about himself and his lack of mental stability than he probably really wanted to . . . .

As **Biggirl** mentioned, I do hope that you were using a nickname for Mr. O’Reilly, rather than a slight misspelling of my screen name here.

Whatever you may say about my mental stability (which does wax and wane at times), I don’t recall casting myself in the role of meglomanical dictator all that much lately.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bill-oreilly-says-he-wants-to-be-just-like-saddam/362226.md?page=2)
