# Bolivian President Shakedown: US Descends to Dubya Administration Levels of Stupidity, Arrogance

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [July 5, 2013, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726 "2013-07-05T15:28:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2013, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/81 "2013-07-06T19:28:14Z")

</div>

> [@Evil\_Captor](#):
>
> The thing that bothers me about the whole affair isn’t the arrogance, it’s the stupidity. And the pettiness. I really thought the Obama administration was better than that, and for the most part, it has been. But this stupid, arrogant cock-up just stinks of Dubya-era dumbness. It makes me wonder if there is something endemic in the way the State Department works that makes for stupid, petty, arrogant actions whoever the President is.

What in particular is “stupid, petty, arrogant” about attempting to capture a confessed spy in possession of information which could potentially cost lives in the hands of America’s enemies?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2013, 7:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/82 "2013-07-06T19:40:38Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> What in particular is “stupid, petty, arrogant” about attempting to capture a confessed spy in possession of information which could potentially cost lives in the hands of America’s enemies?

The information is gone. It’s not like there is only one copy, Snowden is holding it, and if he is captured, the information is recovered. The purpose here, clearly, is to punish Snowden (pour encourager les autres) and not anything else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Not\_From\_Here](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/2acd7d/32.png) [@Not\_From\_Here](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Not_From_Here)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2013, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/83 "2013-07-06T19:50:50Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> What in particular is “stupid, petty, arrogant” about attempting to capture a confessed spy in possession of information which could potentially cost lives in the hands of America’s enemies?

Trying to capture Snowden is not stupid.What they did with the bolivian president is stupid an arrogant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2013, 2:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/84 "2013-07-07T02:59:58Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> Bolivia is one of the most irrelevant countries on Earth so fortunately Morales being upset doesn’t impact America at all and certainly none of the European countries involved.

Which gives us the right to treat him like Joe Blow rather than a head of state?

Y’know, lately I’ve been getting on this Administration in other fora for its ‘kiss up, kick down’ approach to justice. Nice to know it applies to its diplomacy too.

> [@](#):
>
> Much the same can be said for all of Latin America, which has formed itself an “Axis of the Stupid” in the past few decades that seems to revolve around massively mismanaging their economies while electing guys who whine about the United States as a part time job.

Sounds like you know a lot about Latin America. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrokenBriton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@BrokenBriton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrokenBriton)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2013, 9:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/85 "2013-07-07T09:01:31Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> In the grand scheme of things it’s irrelevant how many countries in Latin America dislike the United States, it’s not like they actually do anything about it–we still maintain healthy trade relations which is all that really matters when talking about minor countries. They aren’t a Russia or China where there are strategic geopolitical concerns at play.

Yep, totally irrelevant to the War on Drugs, national oil security and the shifting US voting demograpic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrokenBriton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@BrokenBriton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrokenBriton)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2013, 9:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/86 "2013-07-07T09:04:16Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> What in particular is “stupid, petty, arrogant” about attempting to capture a confessed spy in possession of information which could potentially cost lives in the hands of America’s enemies?

Doesn’t a “spy” have to work on behalf of a Principle, and benefit that Principle in return for personal benefit?

The lives of whom? Sounds like you’re an avid absorber of … The Nightly News.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrokenBriton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@BrokenBriton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrokenBriton)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2013, 9:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/87 "2013-07-07T09:09:50Z")

</div>

> [@syncrolecyne](#):
>
> Bolivia lost it’s seacoast to Chile in 1871. Bolivia still maintains a navy and a claim to its “Litoral” province - which is still represented in national imagery. Bolivia’s “landlocked” status is a sore point even today - and Bolivian leaders have long blamed the country’s economic woes on this loss of the coast.
> 
> I just bring this up to point out that Bolivia is perhaps more sensitive to this type of situation than any other country I can think of. There are plenty of landlocked governments of states like Switzerland, Slovakia, or Paraguay that do not see themselves as having been “cheated” of maritime access. This just add to the narrative that Bolivia gets no respect from the outside world.

I get that you’re trying to create a singular, permanent personality because then you can dismiss that ‘personality’ as weird or warped, and by doing so distract from the substantive issue/s - like with Snowden but … what are you talking about?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2013, 10:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/88 "2013-07-07T10:55:56Z")

</div>

> [@BrokenBriton](#):
>
> I get that you’re trying to create a singular, permanent personality because then you can dismiss that ‘personality’ as weird or warped, and by doing so distract from the substantive issue/s - like with Snowden but … what are you talking about?

If I may, that poster was simply pointing out that governments (and, to some extent, residents) of different countries tend to see certain events in ways that are partly shaped by the history if the country and its people – especially if that history includes what are perceived as grievous injustices against the country as a whole.

Sure, there are problems with generalizing about attitudes of millons of people who just happen to live within a state boundary line, but the post was a good observation (it’s not so problematic to generalize about the attitudes of _governments_), and it’s odd that you are taking issue with this. You seem to think it’s somehow taking away from the accolades you think Sniwden deserves, but it shouldn’t matter. Snowden may or may not deserve accolades, but the fact that some governments have their own reasons for assisting him doesn’t affect that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrokenBriton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@BrokenBriton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrokenBriton)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2013, 12:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/89 "2013-07-07T12:39:08Z")

</div>

> [@JKellyMap](#):
>
> If I may, that poster was simply pointing out that governments (and, to some extent, residents) of different countries tend to see certain events in ways that are partly shaped by the history if the country and its people – especially if that history includes what are perceived as grievous injustices against the country as a whole.
> 
> Sure, there are problems with generalizing about attitudes of millons of people who just happen to live within a state boundary line, but the post was a good observation (it’s not so problematic to generalize about the attitudes of _governments_), and it’s odd that you are taking issue with this. You seem to think it’s somehow taking away from the accolades you think Sniwden deserves, but it shouldn’t matter. Snowden may or may not deserve accolades, but the fact that some governments have their own reasons for assisting him doesn’t affect that.

Right. ‘Bolivia’ is more sensitive about this kind of thing because when it was younger something nasty happened and it’s still in therapy because of that nasty thing. It must be difficult; we shouldn’t pity poor Bolivia, lets try to be understanding.

You could almost think this isn’t actually about the behaviour of the political class governing the empire in the north of the Americas.

In exactly the same way it’s not about mass surveillance and lying to Congress it’s about .. .what is the narrative this week … a college drop out with a grudge harming his own people?

Let’s just focus on everything that isn’t the central issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/cc9497/32.png) [@Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt.Ridley_s_Shooting_Party)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/90 "2013-07-08T13:28:53Z")

</div>

> [@Richard\_Parker](#):
>
> I have no problem presuming the US was involved in the absence of evidence. But being outraged based on this weak presumption is pretty silly. It’s entirely possible these countries wanted to avoid the small chance of ending up in Russia’s unenviable diplomatic position.

Unenviable in what way? Seems like Russia’s in a pretty good position. They get to thumb their noses at the West over human rights issues for a change all the while America runs around like a chucklehead trying to track Snowden down.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 1:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/91 "2013-07-08T13:32:42Z")

</div>

> [@Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](#):
>
> Unenviable in what way? Seems like Russia’s in a pretty good position. They get to thumb their noses at the West over human rights issues for a change all the while America runs around like a chucklehead trying to track Snowden down.

Unenviable in that domestic politics requires some show of resistance to the United States (what you describe above), while both international diplomacy and probably national security counsel for turning him over. Most observers think Putin would be happy to turn over Snowden if it weren’t going to harm his image at home.

This dilemma would be much worse for a country like Spain, where the domestic pressure is as strong or stronger, and the diplomatic and security consequences are more important.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/92 "2013-07-08T13:54:15Z")

</div>

Nah, in Spain there would be no such dilema. PP, he party of the current government is supposed to be all cozy with our American friends; the other large party, socialists PSOE, actually is more in love with the Americans (specially with Republican policies) than PP is.

There would be demonstrations but either party would just merrily hand over anybody the USA asked for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/93 "2013-07-08T13:54:34Z")

</div>

> [@Richard\_Parker](#):
>
> Unenviable in that domestic politics requires some show of resistance to the United States (what you describe above), while both international diplomacy and probably national security counsel for turning him over. Most observers think Putin would be happy to turn over Snowden if it weren’t going to harm his image at home.
> 
> This dilemma would be much worse for a country like Spain, where the domestic pressure is as strong or stronger, and the diplomatic and security consequences are more important.

I agree about Spain, but not about Russia. Whether or not Putin _wants_ to turn Snowden over to the U.S., I don’t see what cost there is to Russia for continuing to let him stay in Sheremetyevo limbo.

ETA: Given that **Nava** understands Spain far better than I ever will, I retract my comment on Spain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/94 "2013-07-08T13:58:02Z")

</div>

> [@Nava](#):
>
> Nah, in Spain there would be no such dilema. PP, he party of the current government is supposed to be all cozy with our American friends; the other large party, socialists PSOE, actually is more in love with the Americans (specially with Republican policies) than PP is.
> 
> There would be demonstrations but either party would just merrily hand over anybody the USA asked for.

I suppose I am to infer that having demonstrations in opposition to government action is not a downside in Spain?

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> I agree about Spain, but not about Russia. Whether or not Putin _wants_ to turn Snowden over to the U.S., I don’t see what cost there is to Russia for continuing to let him stay in Sheremetyevo limbo.  
> .

Well, it hurts US-Russia relations, for one. There will no doubt be a tit for that tat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 2:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/95 "2013-07-08T14:22:33Z")

</div>

> [@Richard\_Parker](#):
>
> Well, it hurts US-Russia relations, for one. There will no doubt be a tit for that tat.

Well, like what? What might Russia want from us that they might not get on account of this?

I see that Obama wants a new nuclear arms reduction treaty that would substantially reduce the number of warheads on each side. Chances are he wants that treaty more than Putin does.

And we don’t give any monetary aid to Russia, nor are any new trade agreements with them being considered (unless they’re one of the countries that would be in the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and they’re not going to be treated differently from the others if they are).

I just don’t see where we have much leverage; it seems to lie much more with them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/96 "2013-07-08T14:49:29Z")

</div>

Like all large countries, there are innumerable ways in which Russia’s interests, large and small, depend on the good will of the United States (and vice versa). The tit-for-tat over the human rights legislation Congress passed, leading to Russia’s restrictions on US adoptions, is just one of the most recent examples.

If Russia could send over Snowden to earn a diplomatic bargaining chip without domestic political cost, I think it would do it in an instant. It would get something for nothing. They can, of course, expressly condition his return on some favor, but that is a much more fraught and risky course.

All IMHO, of course. I don’t know much more about diplomacy than what I read in the papers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 3:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/97 "2013-07-08T15:11:32Z")

</div>

> [@Richard\_Parker](#):
>
> Like all large countries, there are innumerable ways in which Russia’s interests, large and small, depend on the good will of the United States (and vice versa). The tit-for-tat over the human rights legislation Congress passed, leading to Russia’s restrictions on US adoptions, is just one of the most recent examples.

Well, that’s an example of Russia denying _us_ something _we_ wanted. When’s the last time we either gave, or didn’t give, Russia something _they_ wanted?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2013, 3:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726/98 "2013-07-08T15:27:09Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> Well, that’s an example of Russia denying _us_ something _we_ wanted. When’s the last time we either gave, or didn’t give, Russia something _they_ wanted?

In that example, what they wanted was for Congress not to pass that law.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bolivian-president-shakedown-us-descends-to-dubya-administration-levels-of-stupidity-arrogance/662726.md?page=4)
