# Bone - Re: ElvisL1ves' Warning in Elections

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bone-re-elvisl1ves-warning-in-elections/808711>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [February 12, 2018, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bone-re-elvisl1ves-warning-in-elections/808711 "2018-02-12T19:22:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2018, 7:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bone-re-elvisl1ves-warning-in-elections/808711/7 "2018-02-12T19:46:20Z")

</div>

> [@Morgenstern](#):
>
> _Alternative facts, your people call them._ (quoting from the link)
> 
> That doesn’t seem to point at a poster but at a group.

That wasn’t the only time **ElvisL1ves** used the “alternative facts” formulation. He also said this:

> [@When Did We Get So Hateful?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/when-did-we-get-so-hateful/808664/29):
>
> … That includes following the traditional RW alternative-facts approach that pretends Clinton didn’t produce budget _surpluses_. Just for one example.
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > Dems were outraged that they couldn’t sue their way into the White House.

“Dems were outraged that they couldn’t sue their way into the White House” was written by **Shodan** , in post #26. Does that fact change your analysis?

Maybe I’m misunderstanding him, but it seemed pretty clear to me.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bone-re-elvisl1ves-warning-in-elections/808711)._